4.23出成绩了，求教复议经验，口语简直无语。

麦子kevinUID: 2517029

查了成绩，口语出奇的低，上次我没怎么准备，考了17分，这次口语一二题撞上了机经，前两个话题都准备过，才给我一个low，最后口语14分，撞墙的心都有了。其实自己口语不是太牛的那种，但是讲个口语题让老美听懂应该还是不成问题的啊。。。就是因为托福，已经改申明年春季的了。真的不想再考了，求教大家：
1，我是否应该复议

2，复议了是否还会有再降分的可能性。。？



以下是我的成绩单

Test	Test Date	Reading	Listening	Speaking	Writing	Total
TELXML	April 23, 2011	28	26	14	21	89

How to interpret scores?

Reading Skills	Level	Your Performance
Reading	High(22-30)	Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty of the texts. Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure; can understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the language is complex; can recognize the expository organization of a text and the role that specific information serves within the larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
Listening Skills	Level	Your Performance
Listening	High(22-30)	Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly contradictory information. When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied; distinguish more important ideas from less important ones; understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process); recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship); understand many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
Speaking Skills	Level	Your Performance
Speaking about familiar topics	Weak(0 - 1.0)	Your responses are incomplete. They contain little or no content and are difficult for listeners to understand.
Speaking about campus situations	Fair(2.5 - 3.0)	Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading material and experiences typically encountered by university students. You are able to convey relevant information about conversations, newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they do not seriously interfere with overall communication.
Speaking about academic course content	Limited(1.5 - 2.0)	In your responses, you are able to use English to talk about the basic ideas from academic reading or lecture materials, but, in general, you include few relevant or accurate details. It is sometimes difficult for listeners to understand your responses because of problems with grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. Overall, you are able to respond in a general way to the questions, but the amount of information in your responses is limited and the expression of ideas is often vague and unclear.
Writing Skills	Level	Your Performance
Writing based on reading and listening	Fair(2.5 - 3.5)	You responded to the task, relating the lecture to the reading, but your response indicates weaknesses such as an important idea or ideas may be missing, unclear, or inaccurate; there may be unclarity in how the lecture and the reading passage are related; and/or grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.
Writing based on knowledge and experience	Fair(2.5 - 3.5)	You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but your response indicated weaknesses such as you may not provide enough specific support and development for your main points; your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you organize your essay or because of the language you use to connect your ideas; and/or grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make the writing difficult to understand.

麦子kevinUID: 2517029

各位大神，给点意见吧，小弟真是没办法了。。。

麦子kevinUID: 2517029

各位大神，给点意见吧，小弟真是没办法了。。。

麦子kevinUID: 2517029

再顶顶~

willieya0405UID: 2932583

複查看看吧
我之前研究了一下別人複查結果
大部分人口說都可以加了2分左右
作文有看過加到5分的
但也是有少數幾個人變比較低(相對非常少)
我上次複查18變成20
複查如果有更改成績他會退你錢

云天门UID: 2756949

有fair还有weak啊。。。那你复议一下吧，估计能涨一些，但涨太多有点难。

jiangskyskyUID: 2478960

第一次见weak。。复议一下吧。其实觉得最高也就是19了。真不如重考一次。。

sunnylinmyUID: 2914584

第一题的weak是不是你没有录好啊。。不是都撞上机经了吗？

伪经书UID: 2920589

我 27 27 18 22 我已经复议了

四野UID: 2661745

理论上说复议是有降分可能的，看你其它还好，口语特别低，不是发挥失常的话，估计多少会涨点。但是涨的分数有限，不一定能达到你想要的，如楼上说的，还不如重考一次呢。、

麦子kevinUID: 2517029

7# jiangskysky
我第一，二 题考试前还准备过，难道是我说的那两句被他们听出来是背的？  那也不会这么低吧。。。。。。