特殊问题 申请讨论

jiang08UID: 2391146

比如，在第二个链接里
In the United States, immigration law is governed entirely by federal law, and in 1996 the federal government passed a law called the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which defines ...
howellhong 发表于 2011-5-11 01:16

this is probably true, about federal and state laws
lz, jia jie hun ba.....
i don't know if Canada would be better for you. like you getting PR first and somehow marry her? But that's gonna take a few years I assume.

bettymmUID: 2805168

lz老婆可以考虑下社区大学或者州立大学的ms么 很多还是不难考的 G T要求都非常低 学费也可以选很便宜的 一年后她毕业出来就能工作 这样也很好啊

bettymmUID: 2805168

回ls的 要看什么专业了 前几届的师兄老婆F2过去后 在附近的一个小学校读了会计ms 毕业后工作找的不错 工资比师兄还高 这个可能要分专业看

jiang08UID: 2391146

社区大学MS毕业在美国找得到工作么。？
一些该 发表于 2011-5-11 21:44

if CS, higher chances
accounting has not been that great in recent years.
But this whole deal is very dangerous, if she fails to land a job right after graduation while her I20 expires, you can do nothing to help her stay in the U.S. The same for you. F2/H4 do not work for you. It'd be a lot better if one of you can secure a green card....But that's risky as well.
If you think the most important thing for you is her, then try some other countries, or stay in China. I know the U.S. sounds like a democratic paradise for LGBT, but it is not, especially for foreign citizens.

nynyaaaUID: 204913

美国联邦政府不承认同性婚姻。

jiang08UID: 2391146

我问了XDF管研究生留美的部门经理
他说可以 说B2或者F1过去可以找当地律师转F2 不过要在同性恋能结婚的州
一些该 发表于 2011-5-12 09:25

严重怀疑新东方的人嘴巴里排的气体。。。
lz你需要官方的说法，比如大使馆，而不是XDF………………

nynyaaaUID: 204913

请你咨询有美国联邦执业律师资质的人。XDF的都是有忽悠骗钱资质的人。

generUID: 119764

XDF。。。

nynyaaaUID: 204913

联邦政府受联邦法律管辖，如果USCIS给你们配偶身份，无论这种身份在你所在州是否合法，都是违法联邦法律的行为。所以你可以在美国承认同性婚姻的州登记结婚，但是这种结婚的状态只能在这个州的管辖范围内有效。而任何移民相关的事宜是联邦政府的管辖范围，联邦政府无法违法为你提供相关的移民身份。
Defense of Marriage Act (Pub. L. 104-199)
The
word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one
woman as husband and wife, and the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person
of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.”


In March 2003, William Yates of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), issued a lengthy memo instructing DHS officials about various aspects of marriage under US immigration law. One small section of that memo addresses the issue of same-sex marriages, and refers to the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996. The DOMA provides a statutory definition of marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. The DOMA applies this definition to any federal law or regulation as well as to any interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the federal government of the US. Thus, according to Mr. Yates, to qualify as a marriage for purposes of federal law, as well as the Immigration and Nationality Act, one partner must be a man and the other a woman in a marriage. Even though the highest court in a state legalizes same-sex marriage, it would not have any impact on the ability of one same-sex partner in a marriage to confer immigration benefit on the other under current federal immigration policy.