寄托天下
查看: 9874|回复: 7

[问题求助] 新G ISSUE60 怎么破题 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
25
寄托币
231
注册时间
2010-10-24
精华
0
帖子
17
发表于 2011-5-27 22:48:17 |显示全部楼层
RT


Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.

这个题刚拿到手的时候觉得挺好写,但是又觉得对待  commonground 和 elusive ideals的意思抓的不准~~~

求高手指点~
求各位大哥大姐的帮助~~~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

声望
3714
寄托币
108429
注册时间
2006-2-10
精华
21
帖子
5437

囧章 Gemini双子座 枫情万种 一帆枫顺   枫华绝代 荣誉版主

发表于 2011-5-28 01:47:26 |显示全部楼层
我的建议是 开篇第一段把你觉得模棱两可的概念都给个定义 你自己定义过了就能抓准了
休假中 站内短信看不到 请见谅
紧急问题请发电子邮件 guessywang@gmail.com
不加QQ和人人 请见谅

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
586
寄托币
7280
注册时间
2010-4-12
精华
2
帖子
365

荣誉版主 Pisces双鱼座

发表于 2011-5-29 16:34:12 |显示全部楼层
common ground and reasonable consensus 指的应该是一些实在的利益吧。
elusive ideals 指的是政治理想。
可以两边都兼顾,两边都举例说明。
纯属个人意见,呵呵。。
徘徊记忆的边缘,当年几点深情,如遥灵,为盈盈一笑,斜阳染幽草;昔日几许仗义,似遥如,相伴而行,莫失莫忘。壮志凌云几分愁,知己难逢几人留,当初诺言,沧海桑田,流走的时光越来越远,还能再记得他们,十几二十几的年龄,如花似梦,是他们是我们最美丽的相逢,花开花落望穿多少个秋。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
25
寄托币
231
注册时间
2010-10-24
精华
0
帖子
17
发表于 2011-8-18 11:51:00 |显示全部楼层
common ground and reasonable consensus 指的应该是一些实在的利益吧。
elusive ideals 指的是政治理想。
可以两边都兼顾,两边都举例说明。
纯属个人意见,呵呵。。
shinian1987 发表于 2011-5-29 16:34

目前为止,我是这么想的。但是我在考虑,如果想however,而举反例的话应该怎么说,比如说,政治家因为政治野心而获得成功的。。。。。。
求各位大哥大姐的帮助~~~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
25
寄托币
231
注册时间
2010-10-24
精华
0
帖子
17
发表于 2011-8-18 11:51:56 |显示全部楼层
我的建议是 开篇第一段把你觉得模棱两可的概念都给个定义 你自己定义过了就能抓准了
Guessy 发表于 2011-5-28 01:47

好办法。。。。
求各位大哥大姐的帮助~~~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
1
寄托币
156
注册时间
2011-7-28
精华
0
帖子
7
发表于 2011-8-20 19:46:24 |显示全部楼层
我看到的一个翻译版本是:“政治家应该寻求共同点和理性的一致,而不是深奥的理想。”

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
25
寄托币
231
注册时间
2010-10-24
精华
0
帖子
17
发表于 2011-8-21 00:18:11 |显示全部楼层
这个帖子放到这里很久了,我说一下我想的。
我想的是common ground and reasonable consensus基本上都是在人民的角度出发,为人民谋利益方面而来的,在这里我的论证是一正一反:1.可以带来安定的社会和稳定的发展。2。倘若没有追求common……就会尤其是在国家或社会处于危难的时候给人们带来疾苦。然后最后论证,这两方面并不冲突,在独立战争的时候,解放黑奴在所有人眼里就是elusive ideal。但是他还是本着为人民的利益出发,努力实施这项政策,并且取得成功。这就可以说是两方面的结合,既idealism又pragmatism

我是这么想的。欢迎交流
求各位大哥大姐的帮助~~~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
15
寄托币
231
注册时间
2012-10-30
精华
0
帖子
36
发表于 2015-8-28 17:08:07 |显示全部楼层
Should our political leaders pursue common ground and reasonable consensus? Or should they focus on elusive ideals? While it is true that a pragmatic leader would aim for reasonable consensus and succeed in accomplishing a common goal, their achievements may only be mediocre, whereas the rare iconoclastic leader achieves greatness by attaining goals  thought to be unattainable, holding true to ideals which many people may classify as elusive. Let me illustrate my viewpoint with some examples.
Abraham Lincoln is considered as one of the greatest presidents of the United States. He led the country through a great consititutional, military and moral crisis – the American civil war – preserving the union, while abolishing slavery and promoting economic modernization. Had he strived for a consensus and compromised his ideals of true equality for every individual, regardless of their race, the course of our nation’s history might have been different. Slavery, a brutal injustice could still have flourished in this country for longer. The life and legacy of Mahatma Gandhi is another case in point. When India was under the British rule, when the demands for the independence of the nation was being ignored and  Indians were treated like second rate citizens by the imperialists in their own country, Gandhi advocated for a nonviolent resistance as a strategy to fight the British. Many thought that the principles of ahimsa and nonviolence were elusive ideals, however through his words and deeds, Gandhi was able to convince the masses and go forwards with the nonviolent freedom struggle which culminated in India attaining independence in 1947.
Is it always worthwhile pursuing elusive ideals? I do not think so. The recent failure of the super committee in reaching a consensus regarding deficit reduction is an example. The Republicans and Democrats both stuck to their ideals, were unwilling to compromise, and no effective deal could be made. This indecision is frustrating when United States is going through trying economic times, and the debt levels are at an all time high.
In summary, I believe that politicians should try their best to reach a consensus and pursue goals benefitting the public while aspiring to stay true to their ideals. If a consensus cannot be reached, and the ideals at stake are the ones that would lead to a greater common good, they may have to try alternate strategies and unconventional methods to attain those ideals.

使用道具 举报

RE: 新G ISSUE60 怎么破题 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
新G ISSUE60 怎么破题
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1268816-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部