- 最后登录
- 2015-3-17
- 在线时间
- 1396 小时
- 寄托币
- 22475
- 声望
- 266
- 注册时间
- 2003-7-14
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 帖子
- 188
- 精华
- 88
- 积分
- 4353
- UID
- 140258
   
- 声望
- 266
- 寄托币
- 22475
- 注册时间
- 2003-7-14
- 精华
- 88
- 帖子
- 188
|
87 "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."
I strongly agree with the author on the statement that beginners are more likely than experts to make important discoveries. Nevertheless, the function of the green hands cannot be exaggerated and the maximum efficiency is achieved only through well-designed cooperation between them.
That the beginners are usually luckier in making significant discoveries is best demonstrated in their nature of being beginners. Unlike experts who have summarized and applied a sophisticated method in their researches, beginners are usually, at first, ignorant of how to get their work started. Though under the guidance of their supervisors, they may occasionally have no idea to certain problems and the only way out is to try, regardless of the consequences. With the wildest ideas supported by the most inadequate evidences, beginners recklessly put them into practice and expect desirable results. Marvelous as it may seem, some significant discoveries in the human history, the electron spin theory for example, were made in this way, although failures always dominate among the outcomes. The routine methods of the experts' would have sentenced those unfounded fantasies to death, ensuring their success in trivial and gradual inquiries and preventing them from making momentous discoveries at one shot. In a sharp contrast with them, the beginners have no choice but to try, and their courage is sometimes rewarded with phenomena that may be proven crucial later on.
However, discoveries would have remained nonsense without the experts' work, while beginners can rarely make explicit explanations on their own. Experts are more familiar with theories and principles in their fields than beginners, and thus may effectively discern the cause and effect, along with its application. Important as they are, these discoveries can serve to establish a brand new theory, or help prove or disprove a theory not justified, or have a great value in practical use. It is the experts, not the beginners, that abstract the core of the problem, make in-depth analysis, study its inconsistency with current theory if necessary, and form conclusive judgment. Were it not for their knowledge, beginners would be racking their brains to draw absurd inferences from senseless phenomena, which is a waste of time and effort with little yield. Beginners, therefore, owe their gratitude to experts who have turned accidents into well-reasoned integrals.
Thus, the cooperation between beginners and experts becomes significant in the advancement of a certain field of inquiry. Beginners excels in creativity, imagination, and devotion to new things in their own field, with no fear for derision or punishment for failure, while experts are experienced, prudent, and proficient at probing into uncertainties. Both have their distinct advantage and can better themselves by learning from the others. In this way, we can expect beginners to unearth the very essence of their discoveries independently, and experts can free themselves from routines at times to envision in novel perspectives. The beneficiary in turn, is their field of study.
In conclusion, I believe that beginners are more likely to make important discoveries in any field of inquiry, while experts help realize the theoretical or practical value in these discoveries. The optimum combination should be, and always is, that the beginners and the experts work together and learn from each other.
写了2h10多分啊,哭ing |
|