上庭归来。。。。。。

AmerigoUID: 2140122

罚多少钱啊。。。

猛农过江UID: 2597848

原价150
现在罚70

我一哥们和我差不多，也是crime里最轻的级别
请律师花了1000+才搞定

想想我就平衡了 lol

darkathrunUID: 2813505

原价150
现在罚70

我一哥们和我差不多，也是crime里最轻的级别
请律师花了1000+才搞定

想想我就平衡了 lol
猛农过江 发表于 2011-7-12 13:23

criminal case可以要法庭指派律师，免费。

到底是什么情况？真是出老千被抓了么？

doraliuUID: 2842061

调戏未成年少女被抓住了。。。。

caoxuemeiUID: 2629828

crime？求普及，什么级别算crime了啊？我是路盲加法盲，极有可能犯这样的错误

maggie要见你UID: 2871222

调戏未成年少女被抓住了。。。。
doraliu 发表于 2011-7-12 17:36

哈哈哈哈

萝卜须根多UID: 3008387

这个大发了。。。。。

萝卜须根多UID: 3008387

这个大发了。。。。。

wzy0136UID: 2733845

擦~出千要砍手的!

大L.冰火奥术师UID: 3102235

天啊。。。

猛农过江UID: 2597848

criminal case可以要法庭指派律师，免费。

到底是什么情况？真是出老千被抓了么？
darkathrun 发表于 2011-7-12 13:57

他们不给我免罪我就打算trial了
当时是跟检察官？谈条件
他们不止一个人过来跟我说这个案子绝对没有回旋的余地
于是我心里一边骂娘一边很礼貌的说那我不认罪好了

RayTongUID: 2325885

农叔肿么又犯事儿了

darkathrunUID: 2813505

他们不给我免罪我就打算trial了
当时是跟检察官？谈条件
他们不止一个人过来跟我说这个案子绝对没有回旋的余地
于是我心里一边骂娘一边很礼貌的说那我不认罪好了
猛农过江 发表于 2011-7-14 00:44

prosecutor那帮人。。。

如果你plead的话结果肯定没有现在的好，唉，中国美国都一样


还是很好奇农叔你到底犯了啥事被抓进去

猛农过江UID: 2597848

prosecutor那帮人。。。

如果你plead的话结果肯定没有现在的好，唉，中国美国都一样


还是很好奇农叔你到底犯了啥事被抓进去
darkathrun 发表于 2011-7-14 07:54

开注册过期的车子，我以为只要注册一次就行了，谁知道每年都要。。

居然是刑事罪。。。。我也只不过过期了7个多月嘛。。。。


prosecutor从我第一次去就轮流过来跟我说这个案子谁都没办法，只能按照原判
幸亏我坚持抵赖。。。。最后连律师都省了lol

darkathrunUID: 2813505

开注册过期的车子，我以为只要注册一次就行了，谁知道每年都要。。

居然是刑事罪。。。。我也只不过过期了7个多月嘛。。。。


prosecutor从我第一次去就轮流过来跟我说这个案子谁都没办法，只能按照原判 ...
猛农过江 发表于 2011-7-14 18:52

pat pat，查了下，果然重罪，和藐视法庭一个级别，鬼子脑残的厉害，这么奇怪的量刑。。。。。


看了个指导技巧


License Status
Sometimes, a motorist's name is mistakenly on the list of revoked or suspended licenses at the time he or she is stopped by the police for a traffic violation. For example, another person with a similar name may actually be the person whose license was revoked or suspended. Or, the driver's license may have been suspended and then restored, but the restoration of driving privileges may not have been entered into the state's records properly.
So, the first step in defending a charge of driving while license revoked or suspended is to order a computer printout of the driver's record from the state's department of motor vehicles to ensure that the license was, in fact, suspended or revoked on the date in question.
If it was not, or if it was revoked or suspended by mistake, you should get a document containing a statement to that effect from the state and present it to the prosecuting attorney with a request that the pending charge be dismissed. If the prosecuting attorney does not dismiss the charge, the document should be used as evidence at trial to disprove the State's case.
Normally, the prosecutor or police officer will not proceed with a case if such a document is produced.
Lack of Proper Notice
Did the motorist receive the proper notice of suspension or revocation? The notice requirement is usually satisfied if the license was suspended or revoked in court by a judge with the defendant present. However, if the license was suspended or revoked by the department of motor vehicles for points (that is, a type of "demerit" system under which a license is being suspended based on the cumulative violations of a driver), not paying a traffic or parking ticket, or some other reason, the State must prove notice to the defendant.
Most statutes concerning loss of license contain a provision stating the kind of notice required. The crime requires at least constructive receipt of the license revocation order. Usually, notice of a suspension or revocation must be given at the person's last known address by certified or regular mail.
What if the defendant never actually received the notice? Generally, if there is proof that the notice was mailed to the address on record it is enough to support a conviction. In most states, a driver has an obligation under the law to notify the department of motor vehicles of a change of address. So, a defendant who does not provide that notification cannot use lack of notice as a defense.
To prove proper notification, the State does not have to produce the actual person who sent out the notice. Normally, a certification or affidavit of mailing is sufficient. A copy of the letter that was sent is usually insufficient unless there is evidence that it was in fact mailed.
As to sufficiency or adequacy of the notice, it falls on the motorist to produce some evidence that the notice was, in fact, inadequate.
Finally, if the defendant was not afforded the opportunity for a hearing after receiving notice of the revocation or suspension, the motorist can assert the defense that the attempted suspension or revocation of his or her license is void, or without effect, as a matter of law.
Identity of the Driver
One defense to the offense of driving with a suspended or revoked license is that the defendant was not operating the vehicle. The act of operating, or driving, is a fact issue that must be proven by the State beyond a reasonable doubt. Operation can be proven either by direct evidence, such as a traffic stop of the moving vehicle, or circumstantial evidence, such as testimony that the defendant was found alone and unconscious in car, in the driver's area, with the keys in the ignition, but with the motor not running. The term "operation" can have a broader definition under a driving while revoked or suspended statute than under a statute dealing only with a licensing requirement. For example, operation may mean merely having physical control of the vehicle, which can be proven by circumstantial evidence.