issue219

imongUID: 140258

我昨天写issue写到一多半发现跑题了，然后很费劲地把后半篇给写完了。
今天则是写到一半发现根本写不下去了，因为看题的时候太不小心，基本上是按照一个篡改后的topic在写东西。然后把写好的1，2，半个3 paragraph全删了（useless）郁闷ing
不知道是小心一点就能避免还是需要加强incisive分析能力。
很头疼的。
感觉实在是很tricky，因为有时间限制，一个不小心就走偏了，然后高高兴兴开始写，写到一半再发现。我可不想明天再重演。

把物证也放上来吧，issue219，昨天的。
219"Now that computer technology has made possible the rapid accessing of large amounts of factual information, people are less likely than ever to think deeply or originally. They feel unable to compete with—much less contribute to—the quantity of information that is now available electronically."

The advancement of computer technology has made it possible to bombard people at a high frequency with large amounts of factual information. Therefore, it is no surprise that people feel incompetent to process the enormous quantity, having their reasoning ability impaired in this e-age.

Though without intention, computer technology realized the information attack, once unthinkable yet nowadays commonplace. Thanks to the high-density storage technology, thousands of books can be made available within a disk. While it has been much more convenient to preserve documents in the form of databases, other uses of this technology emerged rapidly. Few people take pains to draw, paint and copy fliers; all they have to do is to send a group email, as one click renders hundreds of files with identical contents lying in various e-mailboxes. This practice grew so popular that we have long been obsessed with tens of junk mails with various purposes each day. More than that, there are pop-up windows, banners, flash images, and so forth, all overwhelm our screen within a second. Admit it or not, people have become receptacles of everyday bombardment, whether they are willing to do so.

Thus we fall the victim of the everlasting attacks and eventually let our emotion dominate over reason, which is right to the propagandists’ wants. We are deprived of the time necessary for thorough thinking, yet given one scene after another to instill ideas that may contradict the original ones. Usually people are successfully converted and become frenetic follower singing the same tone, regardless of the truth behind the image. This is the case when we visit the bulletin boards, the hotbed of radical ideas, where the agitated cling to the idea of somebody’s, negligent of human principles. And the same for website commentary. It is worth questioning why some claims by e-news editors against basic human rights are highly exalted by their visitors. Propaganda wins the moment people are stirred up by incitation and give up reasoning, which they could have done to avoid wrongful judgment.

Miserable as the situation seems, I believe there is still one way out. I think being skeptical is of vital importance in this age of abundant information. For issue of any kind, doubt and then decide. No matter how appealing the suggestion sounds, no matter how righteous the statement seems, we should never be predisposed to believe. Only to stand unbiased and to balance opinions from all sides can we preserve our distinct points of view. The massive volume of information will no longer be a headache once we reserve our position and modify it to our own wills. This is the strategy against everyday bombardments.

In conclusion, the development of computer technology has enabled propaganda the means of bombardment, which impairs people’s reasoning ability and conform their ideas to a designed one. Hence the masses should keep skeptical to think on their own, and beware of brainwashing of any kind.

1h35min，严重跑题。
被认为是无病呻吟的一篇力作。还跑题。（ft中）

brilliant77UID: 11224

上了新东方的课，有个根据题目建立论述结构的方法，仅供参考！
1  computer technology has made possible the rapid accessing of large amounts of factual information,

2 people are less likely than ever to think deeply or originally.（个人可以持反对意见）

3 They feel unable to compete with—much less contribute to—the quantity of information that is now available electronically    .（个人可以持反对意见）

我想这样就不太容易跑题，可以试试咯！

paisleyUID: 64183

不要着急！ 我以前写的时候也经常写到一半觉得自己跑题了。痛苦，犹豫该怎么把话题拉回来。其实事后看看还可以，没有明显的跑题的。

imongUID: 140258

brilliant你的说法就是拆开来分别写
可是如果像这种的呢？

Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.

（不过这种倒 less 容易跑，只要能有东西写）

ken0405UID: 124994

先想好提纲，会好点吧。
1，先说censorship是存在，
2，再说原因，为了延续文化，保持社会稳定，比如美国不可以让本拉登，saddam在他那搞宣传吧。
3，说作用，保护青少年，sex， voilence等等。prevent potential harm

ken0405UID: 124994

朋友送我的打油寺（见签名挡）还算漂亮吧
也不知道是不是抄别人的
管他
呵呵
挺喜欢。

langsiuUID: 122509

Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
审查制度即使曾经公平过，也是很少见的。

我感觉ken0405的提纲没有切中要害，似乎是在说Censorship 的存在，原因和意义，但是
issue主要提及的是justify的问题。

ken0405UID: 124994

哦
是呀
是呀
我又跑题了
需要对公正定义了。
define as？？

gteryyUID: 114434

防止跑题的一个办法就是每写一句想一下是否围绕题目而写