【Daily Writing 作文特训小组】little_caty习作贴，欢迎大家多多指教~

little_catyUID：3014175

8月4日 All school teachers should be required to take courses every five years to update their knowledge.


People regard education as one of the most critical areas in the society, generating many discussions about education. Among these discussions, a topic about whether all school teachers should be required to have lessons every five years to update their knowledge has been discussed. In my opinion, it is essential to require teachers to update their knowledge frequently to keep pace with society. My perspective will be depicted in following several paragraphs.

In the vibrant and challenging society, rapid elimination forces teachers to update their knowledge and teaching methods. Brought out by people in different realms, thousands of new techniques and ideas make great influence on the improvement of society. These useful techniques can take the place of previous ones at any time. If students major in Computer Science still learn Fortran Language at school, but actually this compiling language has already be instead of C Language, they cannot use what they learn at school and later have to spare time to learn C after they start working. This kind of problem does not only waste educational resources, but also spoil students’ best time to learn. To avoid these problems, teachers have responsibility to instruct students with knowledge adapt to the modern society.

Additionally, frequently updating knowledge can help improving capacity and reducing mistakes. Updating knowledge, teachers can understand knowledge more deeply and completely, which is good for teaching as well. Interesting and practical application connecting abstract knowledge with common life make students feel familiar and interested, which can help them understand better. On the other hand, a new theory may point out mistakes in textbooks. By learning it in time, teachers can cease wrong theories from spreading. Undoubtedly, these two factors both have significant effect on teaching.

In opposite, keeping teaching method consistent has bad impact and dangerous to some extent. Improper insist of an outdated theory may conduct the students to a wrong direction. As a famous saying said,” Right direction is more important than working hard”. A long lasting period of research in wrong direction can bring nothing but failure and a waste of time, causing unnecessary loss.

All in all, the importance of teaching demands teachers to be highly responsible and update knowledge frequently, every five years for instance. In this way, they can cultivate more talented students, who will make great contribution to the progress of society.

Fruit~UID：2559265

People regard education as one of the most critical areas in the society, generating many discussions about education (cannot understand this usage. I suggest using "....., which generates......"). Among these discussions, a topic about whether all school teachers should be required to have lessons every five years to update their knowledge has been discussed. In my opinion, it is essential to require teachers to update their knowledge frequently to keep pace with society (cannot understand this sentence). My perspective will be depicted in following several paragraphs.
3 [3 \. W$ F: ]2 z& }; V. K. V* t( {0 s1 V! T
In the (a)vibrant and challenging society, rapid elimination forces teachers to update their knowledge and teaching methods. Brought out by people in different realms, thousands of new techniques and ideas make great influence on the improvement of society. These useful techniques can take the place of (eliminate)previous ones at any time. If students major in Computer Science still learn Fortran Language at school, but actually this compiling language has already be instead of C Language, they cannot use what they learn at school and later have to spare time to learn C after they start working (way tooooo long). This kind of problem does not only waste educational resources, but also spoil students’ best time to learn. To avoid these problems, teachers have responsibility to instruct students with knowledge adapt to the modern society (grammatical mistakes).
* {8 I3 W& m2 G. u' C7 \+ t! l0 G. b0 g- x* O' x# t/ a
Additionally, frequently updating knowledge can help improving (improve) capacity and reducing (reduce) mistakes. (Through) Updating knowledge, teachers can understand knowledge more deeply and completely, which is good for teaching as well. Interesting and practical application connecting abstract knowledge with common life make students feel familiar and interested, which can help them understand better (Students can also benefit from teachers' practical application of abstract theories make your sentence more concise). On the other hand (where is "on the one hand"? "on the other hand" always appear after "on the one hand"), a new theory may point out mistakes in textbooks (grammatical mistake). By learning it (what does "it" refer to here?)in time, teachers can cease wrong theories from spreading. Undoubtedly, these two factors both have significant effect on teaching.
9 ?% S! Q! @$ V6 A6 g9 P% S; S2 [6 O2 B
In opposite, keeping teaching method consistent has bad impact and dangerous to some extent. Improper insist of an outdated theory may conduct the students to a wrong direction. As a famous saying said,” Right direction is more important than working hard”. A long lasting period of research in wrong direction can bring nothing but failure and a waste of time, causing unnecessary loss., }- M. F6 q* X" Q

/ n. o5 }0 {# q# OAll in all, the importance of teaching demands teachers to be highly responsible and update knowledge frequently, every five years for instance. In this way, they can cultivate more talented students, who will make great contribution to the progress of society.

Fruit~UID：2559265

Just browsed the first three paragraphs...

lisq9989UID：2110509

改好了，呵呵，昨天好像就和你一组吧~

little_catyUID：3014175

18# Fruit~ 感谢fruit的耐心指教~我会继续努力的~

little_catyUID：3014175

今天没有时间写作文了，只是批了两篇，明天再来~

little_catyUID：3014175

15# 愤怒公爵
这篇不是我写的啊~

little_catyUID：3014175

8月8日20100312NA Agree or disagree? If children want to do well in school, parents should limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies


Should parents limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies in order to let children do well in school?
Some people assert that parents shouldn’t limit children, since TV programs or movies can help children broaden sight. But others, including me, hold the opinion that parents should limit the hours of watching TV or movies for following several reasons.

First of all, watching TV programs or movies too much may cause reducing of time to study. So young are the children, they cannot do well in self-control and concentrating. For example, they may watch interesting movies for a long time without finishing their assignments, they may keep watching TV series every night and think of the plot or characters in class. Since they cannot behavior rationally and responsibly, they can be easily addicted into interesting programs and forget studying. In this case, parents should limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies to guarantee enough time for children to study, by which can make children do well in school.

Additionally, too much time of watching TV programs or movies can make children think in a negative way, which has bad effect on studying. When children watch TV, they just receive information rather than seek positively. Watching too much interesting but not useful programs not only waste time, but also steal children’s passion of discovering. In a research in America, scientists came up with an opinion that people who like watching TV is more negative than those who don’t, mainly in thinking methods and behaviors. A negative thinking method can make children lose interest in learning new knowledge and dealing with challenges, which is obstacle for doing well in school.

Thirdly, watching too many TV programs or movies may confound children about reality and imagination, as many programs are fabricated. Since children are too young to distinguish truth and false, they may believe what they learn from TV or movies and even imitate some exciting but dangerous behaviors. For instance, several years ago, a girl was too addicted in a TV series and simulated the actress to hang herself, because in her view, she would be saved by others in time like the actress, but unfortunately, her parents were both outside and could not save her. This tragedy is the result of misleading plots of the TV series and child’s credulity. To avoid tragedies like this, parents should cut the time of children to watch TV or movies, and lead them to get knowledge from real life.

All in all, children are too young to control themselves and distinguish bad and good programs, so parents should supervise their children and limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies. In this way, children will live and study in a more healthy and beneficial environment.

smenxiaoUID：2929493

8.8的已改好

little_catyUID：3014175

8月10日20100320NA 有些人觉得他们可以靠自己或者家人的帮助，解决important problems.因此，人们不需要政府的帮助。


Some people assert that they can rely on themselves or their family to solve important problems without help of government. While, in my opinion, people cannot solve all problems by themselves, and they still need help from government in some cases. I will depict my perspective in following several aspects.

First of all, almost everyone in the society gets the help from government in his life, directly or indirectly. Some people may think that they never receive help from government, but it is because they don’t notice it. For instance, when you drive to work, you are on the new broad road built by the government; when you have lunch in school refectory, you can enjoy cheap dishes for the subsidy given by the government; when you are ill in hospital, you can save much medical expenses if you have hospitalization insurance. In this way, people can get help from government any time despite they don’t realize it most of time. Without the help of government, people may find their life tough and inconvenient.


Secondly, governmental policies can help make the society more stable and harmony. As we know, government can view the situation of the whole society and accommodate it properly, which is helpful to the efficiency and fairness. While, if everyone behaviors in the way he likes, there will be seriously social problems, such as corruption and the gap between the rich and poor. For example, if a rich person tends to send his child to the best school in this area, he may bribe the headmaster and despoil the chance of a poor child to receive education. If people encroach on others’ rights in order to enhance living standard of their own life, the selfishness will obstacle the society to develop. Only by rules can the society run healthily and impartially, which tells the importance of government.

All in all, people cannot own an efficient and fair life without help of government. Though not obvious, the help plays a vital role in daily life and make people live in a more stable and healthier society. Thus, people will live better with the efforts not only made by themselves and their family, but also the government.

冰雪蜂鸟UID：2754485

8月10日20100320NA 有些人觉得他们可以靠自己或者家人的帮助，解决important problems.因此，人们不需要政府的帮助。

Some people assert that they can rely on themselves or their family to solve important problems without help of government. While, in my opinion, people cannot solve all problems by themselves, and they still need help from government in some cases. I will depict my perspective in following several aspects.

First of all, almost everyone in the society gets the help from government in his life, directly or indirectly. Some people may think that they never receive help from government, but it is because they don’t notice it. For instance, when you drive to work, you are on the new broad road built by the government; when you have lunch in school refectory, you can enjoy cheap dishes for the subsidy given by the government; when you are ill in hospital, you can save much medical expenses if you have hospitalization insurance.举例的形式很好，但是我认为你的举例是政府为人们提供的基础设施和福利，并不是帮助人们解决问题。所谓问题，并不是提供公路开车，而是公路毁坏了怎么解决。建议先从personal的角度讨论一下。 In this way, people can get help from government any time despite they don’t realize it most of time. Without the help of government, people may find their life tough and inconvenient.

Secondly, governmental policies can help make the society more stable and harmony. As we know that government can view the situation of the whole society and accommodate it properly, which is helpful to the efficiency and fairness. While, if everyone behaviors in the way he likes, there will be seriously social problems, such as corruption and the gap between the rich and poor. For example, if a rich person tends to send his child to the best school in this area, he may bribe the headmaster and despoil the chance of a poor child to receive education. If people encroach on others’ rights in order to enhance living standard of their own life, the selfishness will obstacle the society to develop.在这里可以多用文墨啦解释一下如何government rules make society run healthily and impartially了，一句话就好。你只指出了现象，却没有讲明原因。 Only by rules can the society run healthily and impartially, which tells the importance of government.


All in all, people cannot own(live) an efficient and fair life without help of government. Though not obvious, the help plays a vital role in daily life and make people live in a more stable and healthier society. Thus, people will live better with the efforts not only made by themselves and their family, but also the government.
语言上没有什么大问题，多注意文章整体的构造。

加油！我的作文写好了哦>< https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1279272-11-1.html

草莓刨冰UID：3141036

little_catyUID：3014175

8月12 第一篇综合 TPO7
The speaker holds a lecture to explain why wood companies should support ecocertification, which is against the opinion in the reading. In the reading, the writer lists three aspects in which ecocertification has disadvantages, while in the lecture, the speaker debates separately.

First of all, the reading states that American has been exposed to so much advertising that it cannot work by advertising. While the lecture points out there is a difference between advertisements of company itself and of independent agency. And American consumers tend to believe in the advertisement made by independent agency, which can increase the sales of ecocertified wood if the products are advertised by independent agency.

Secondly, the reading says that higher price of ecocertified wood than common one can lead the consumers to buy cheap one other than ecocertified wood. But in the lecture, the speaker thinks that if the difference between the prices of ecocertified wood and of common one is much small, such as less than 5 percent, the consumers tend to buy ecocertificed wood. Because in this way, people can make contribution to protecting environment.

Thirdly, the speaker asserts that American wood companies must sell ecocertified wood because of foreign competition, even if they don't sell abroad. If American companies don't sell ecocertified wood, foreign companies may grab the market in America, which is much serious.

zhengxiao0312UID：3099700

little_catyUID：3014175

8月18日 20100813NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? More and more people spend too much money on their pet (dogs, cats and others), although there are better uses for these money. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.


With the increasing pressure of competition in the social life, more and more people put their emphasis on pets. Some people assert that they should pay much money to the pets as pets play an important role in people’s life. However, other people argue that people had better spend money on other more useful issues, instead of pets. From my perspectives, I am in favor of the latter statement.

First and foremost, paying too much money on pets can lead to financial problems. As we know, feeding pets is a much expensive activity, which needs money endlessly in various aspects. I will depict the life of a common family with a dog for instance. When the little dog first comes to the home or gets ill, the host must take it to special hospital to take injections; when it is boring, the host has to buy it toys or hire someone to walk the dog; when its hair get long and dirty, the host needs to pay for a special care. Additionally, the expense of dog food everyday is a big deal. If the family is not rich enough to afford these expenses, keeping a pet becomes a burden for them, which can make a negative effect on the standard of their life.


Secondly, paying too much attention on pets may cause a problem of social communication. People are fond of pets for many reasons, mainly about the pets’ loyalty and loveliness. Eager for care and company, some people prefer feeding a pet to communicating with other people. But communication is so important that it cannot be replaced by pets. In a social life, people can share their ideas and motions through talking; they can do sports or entertainments with friends to be pleasant; they can visit their relatives to enjoy family love, which all cannot be replaced by pets. Thus, people should pay more money on exercising, having fun with families, education and so on. In my opinion, these activities are more significant than feeding a pet.

In conclusion, pets cannot be the whole world of people’s life, and people should not pay too much money on pets. In this way, they can enjoy real life better and gain more care and company from other people, which can lead to a happier life.