寄托天下
查看: 2316|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[其它] 请教大家1个阅读问题 谢谢 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
6
寄托币
542
注册时间
2011-7-27
精华
0
帖子
19
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-23 03:26:52 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Many critics of Emily Brontë’s novel Wuthering Heights see its second part as a counter
point that comments on, if it does not reverse, the first part, where a romantic reading
receives more confirmation. Seeing the two parts as a whole is encouraged by the
novel’s sophisticated structure, revealed in its complex use of narrators and time shifts.
Granted that the presence of these elements need not argue for an authorial awareness
of novelistic construction comparable to that of Henry James, their presence does
encourage attempts to unify the novel’s heterogeneous parts. However, any interpretation
that seeks to unify all of the novel’s diverse elements is bound to be somewhat
unconvincing.
This is not because such an interpretation necessarily stiffens into a thesis
(although rigidity in any interpretation of this or of any novel is always a danger),
but because Wuthering Heights has recalcitrant elements of undeniable power that, ultimately,
resist inclusion in an all-encompassing interpretation. In this respect, Wuthering
Heights shares a feature of Hamlet.


The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that an interpretation
of a novel should
A not try to unite heterogeneous elements in the novel
B not be inflexible in its treatment of the elements in the novel
C not argue that the complex use of narrators or of time shifts indicates a
sophisticated structure
D concentrate on those recalcitrant elements of the novel that are outside
the novel’s main structure
E primarily consider those elements of novelistic construction of which the
author of the novel was aware

我觉得A和B 都对,我实在不明白A 错哪了?红色部分能说明A对啊?谢谢。
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

声望
4712
寄托币
38845
注册时间
2009-10-27
精华
16
帖子
5721

寄托优秀版主 Cancer巨蟹座 GRE梦想之帆 GRE斩浪之魂 GRE守护之星 US Assistant US Applicant 分享之阳 美版友情贡献 寄托兑换店纪念章 美版版主 满3年在任版主

沙发
发表于 2011-8-23 03:34:45 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 苏梳眠 于 2011-8-23 03:38 编辑

你的那句话和A选项有出入。
原句中是指unify all不合适,但是A选项中不去unite part~
而且A选项在文中是Henry James的观点,前面作者已经表示了need not to be comparable to Henry James 's ~
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
hgfryty + 1 谢谢,我觉得原句中是指unify all不合适,但 ...

总评分: 声望 + 1   查看全部投币

人山人海,人来人往中却兀自闪闪发亮,独一无二的你!

使用道具 举报

声望
21
寄托币
405
注册时间
2009-5-2
精华
0
帖子
9
板凳
发表于 2011-8-23 11:56:08 |只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽

使用道具 举报

声望
42
寄托币
2699
注册时间
2006-12-16
精华
0
帖子
33
地板
发表于 2011-8-23 12:47:11 |只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
签名被屏蔽

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
6
寄托币
542
注册时间
2011-7-27
精华
0
帖子
19
5
发表于 2011-8-23 19:26:26 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 hgfryty 于 2011-8-23 19:34 编辑

谢谢,我也觉得原句中是指unify all不合适,但是A选项中不去unite part是对的(赞同斑竹前1句的解释),但后面我认为A选项在文中不是Henry James的观点,而是Emily Brontë’s novel的一个特点。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
53
寄托币
1760
注册时间
2010-10-29
精华
0
帖子
501

备考先锋

6
发表于 2012-7-19 19:07:27 |只看该作者
苏梳眠 发表于 2011-8-23 03:34
你的那句话和A选项有出入。
原句中是指unify all不合适,但是A选项中不去unite part~
而且A选项在文中是H ...

仍旧不大明白为什么B是对的...

使用道具 举报

RE: 请教大家1个阅读问题 谢谢 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
请教大家1个阅读问题 谢谢
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1298374-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部