issue122 欢迎大家找茬！

feier521UID: 109747

122"We owe almost all our knowledge not to people who have agreed, but to people who have disagreed."

I disagree with the speaker on the claim that we own almost all our knowledge not to people who have agreed, but to people who have disagreed. In this assertion, the speaker means that those who share the same ideas or perspectives with us will offer not any help for the accumulation of our knowledge at all, which is very preposterous. Insofar as I can think, although different opinions may have a larger contribution to our learning, the role of those who agree us can never been simplified.

Understandably, people will learn more when their ideas and thoughts are challenged by all forms of opposed opinions. First and foremost, the controversies can help people find the underlying fallacies of our ideas or perspectives which people may often overlook. A math test can aptly illustrate this point. Every student has such experience: when they discuss the result of one of math questions, when some different resolutions are put forward by others, they may abruptly find they make a mistake while they originally regard their answer as the self-evident truth. Of course, this is only a small example. When it comes to the wide scientific and research field, the contradicted opinions are of equal importance. This is why our present-day scientific level unceasingly strides forward and the research outcomes emerge continuously. Secondly, contradicted perspectives can expand people’s thinking way and help them accumulate knowledge and experience. Usually, those who disagree us have their own perspectives and their explanations concerning some problems. Through learning these various ideas can we deepen our thoughts and broaden our ken, even if our solution has no obvious flaw. Lastly, those different points of view can give people a deep impression. If they were wrong, they may never forget the right answers put forward by others. Though provoking sometimes, opposed opinions imprint deeply learner’s mind and thus do contribute to their learning.

It should be admittedly that those who have the same viewpoints with us can also contribute to our knowledge accumulation. These same viewpoints can be defined as recognition, commendations or praise. Undoubtedly, recognition and commendation from teachers and parents play a pivot role in the students' learning process. Once they deserve such assessment, they will feel enthusiasm with their study; this interest will promote them to study strenuously to make a higher achievement. In the same token, when it comes scientific inquiry field this kind of praise is also paramount to motivate scientists and researcher to attain larger success. One can go no further to see this point by examining the role played by the Nobel Praise in the academia.

Then come to a question, what are the right attitudes people should possess when they confront all kinds of perspectives? Firstly, people should classify these perspectives into two categories: agree and disagree, then absorb respective merits within them. As for those agreed or praised viewpoints, we should make them as spiritual support to boost our courage and stimulate our motivation; as for those disagreed, people should learn their route of thoughts and the solutions through which they can broaden their horizon and enrich their knowledge.

In conclusion, although those opposed opinions may contribute much to our learning, under no circumstances should we regard the same or the similar points of view as futile in the process of acquiring knowledge. On balance, people should have a right attitude when facing up with all forms of feedbacks.

GcanadaUID: 118286

呵呵, feier你可真会写,经常看你发作文啊!
你到底写了多少篇了?你真行啊,我才写了两篇,做了两次大修改,算四篇吧,写了几个syllibus,FT~~~

而且你写的也好啊!GCDD要向你学习啊!

GcanadaUID: 118286

仔仔细细的看了一遍,觉得你的逻辑真的很不错!小牛啊!

不过在第二段的时候是不是有重复啊?学更多的知识和积累知识重复不?
总的看来,紧奏感不错,没有冗余.

feier521UID: 109747

谢谢Gcanada DD的夸奖，@_@
刚开始就是瞎写。只有数量，没有质量，也不仔细思考题目的意思。后来就是写一篇，认真修改一篇。真正写的其实不多。
但是在规定时间内还是很难写出令自己比较满意的。郁闷
你呢？什么时候考？

第二段？哪里啊？
我的观点：1，不同的观点可以帮助我们发现错误；2，开阔思路，积累知识经验；3，反对的观点给我们留下了深刻的印象。你的意思是2和3吗？

qhywUID: 136716

第四段好棒！
自问自答式，一则澄清一些有疑惑的地方，二则可以使段落变长。不错，要学习这种写法！：）

feier521UID: 109747

谢谢 qhyw
大家继续砌啊...
呵呵，都沉底了，顺便小顶一下。

imongUID: 140258

这篇文章的不足之处就在于，立论立在了disagree上，但是篇幅的安排有些失衡，第二段可以算作是让步的部分，写得太多，第三段是着重论述的点，又写得太少。

语言上有一些零散的小错误，例如 It should be admittedly（admitted？） that ，但是总体来说还是比较通顺的。

ponponUID: 181304

good

wangtiaotiaoUID: 201066

呵呵，我是新兵啊。看到能写出来的都很佩服了.这个确实不错,顶一下

wwllzUID: 190903

The knowlege's progress has their own development discipline, that is proposal of idea, dispute, advance, to next circle of proposal of new idea. So some people assert that we owe almost all our knowledge not to the people who have agreed, but to people who have disagreed. In fact in my personal opinion, we not only should appreciate people who have disagreed, but also honor people who have agreed .

First of all, Important advance in knowledge often were proposed by people who have disagreed the old theory. There is no doubt that the dissenter always play a crucial role in the process of knowledge's advance, They had courage and confidence to insist their own opinion, sometimes confronting the powerful social force and academic authorities. For instance, Copernicus, Polish great astronomer, disagreed the traditional geocentric theory which is surportted by academic pundit Aritotle and might religious force and proposed his own heliocentric theory. Through a century's struggle, The sun-center theory has been accepted by the public eventually and formed the classic theory of the modern astronomy.

The second, the surpporter of the knowledge made their own contribution to the knowledge's development. There are two reasons that we need to thank their contribution. First, the Breaking through of new knowledge cannot arrive without classic theory's surpport  in relevant field. Take a retrospect of computer and internet's develope, without the classic electrical theory and digital theory,logical electrical theory, people even a prodigy can not devise a computer. The relativity's discovery can arrive without the classical mechanical theory discovered by Newton. Addtionnally, Even the old knowledge was not correct, but as a wrong model it stood as target to be scrutinized by the new theory's discoveror. The surpporter's propagation and widespread of the knowledge aroused people's interest and furtherly exploration.

To sum up, From the process of knowledge's development we can see a objective rule that Knowledge 's advance cannot be achieved without both surporters and dissentor of the knowledge.