新G36套中的两道阅读题，求大神解释 太傻没人解答，转贴到寄托

mattjia12UID：2754870

E16-9  国内9204 长文章
If people are regarded only as machines guided by logic, as they were by some "scientistic" thinkers, rhetoric is likely to be held in low regard; for the most obvious truth about rhetoric is that it speaks to the whole person. It presents its arguments first to the person as a rational being. Logical argument is the plot, as it were, of any speech or essay that is respectfully intended to persuade people. Yet it is a characterizing feature of rhetoric that it goes beyond this and appeals to the parts of our nature that are involved in feeling, desiring, acting, and suffering. It recalls relevant instances of the emotional reactions of people to circumstances-real or fictional-that are similar to our own circumstances.
9. The passage suggests that the disparagement of
rhetoric by some people can be traced to their
(A) reaction against science
(B) lack of training in logic
(C) desire to persuade people as completely as
possible
(D) misunderstanding of the use of the term "scientistic"
(E) view of human motivation
If people are regarded only as machines guided by logic, as they were by some "scientistic" thinkers, rhetoric is likely to be held in low regard; 这句话是解题点，但是我怎么就看不出是：对于人们的motivation的看法呢？求做过的同学解释

E17-10
A serious critic has to comprehend the particular content, unique structure, and special meaning of a work of art. And here she faces a dilemma. The critic must recognize the artistic element of uniqueness that requires subjective reaction; yet she must not be unduly prejudiced by such reactions. It is necessary that a critic develop a sensibility informed by familiarity with the history of art and aesthetic theory. On the other hand, it is insufficient to treat the artwork solely historically, in relation to a fixed set of ideas or values. The critic‘s knowledge and training are, rather, a preparation of the cognitive and emotional abilities needed for an adequate personal response to an artwork‘s own particular qualities.

10. The author‘s argument is developed primarily by
the use of
(A) an attack on sentimentality
(B) an example of successful art criticism
(C) a critique of artists training
(D) a warning against extremes in art criticism
(E) an analogy between art criticism and art
production
答案为什么是D，我怎么也看不出是warning和extreme这两个词的意思在文中的体现，求解释

mmchuanjiao2UID：3125003

1说人们被认为是machines guided by logic  可以勉强被认为是与motivation有关吧 我是用POE做的  具体原因等高人回答
2And here she faces a dilemma :   yet she must not be unduly prejudiced by such reactions
On the other hand, it is insufficient to treat the artwork solely historically 可以看出来分别是说两个极端怎么不好啊 仔细理解一下

mattjia12UID：2754870

2# mmchuanjiao2
琢磨琢磨，答案还是比较合理的，但是我考试的时候就一下子反应不过来，或者退不出来呀。10G的孩子伤不起。。。。5555

JohnsonHuangUID：2756534

这两题我也写错了，看看答案，仔细想想是合理。加油，加油，我也10G，还要到杭州去考。加油加油！！

3# mattjia12 zhe

pielangUID：3284254

增补一下第九题的解答，9. The passage suggests that the disparagement of
rhetoric by some people can be traced to their
(A) reaction against science
(B) lack of training in logic
(C) desire to persuade people as completely as
possible
(D) misunderstanding of the use of the term "scientistic"
(E) view of human motivation
文中无法解释第9题的答案E中motivation的来源。这是旧GRE的原文：
Under the force of this view, it was perhaps inevitable that the art of rhetoric should pass from the status of being regarded as of questionable worth (because although it might be both a source of pleasure and a means to urge people to right action, it might also be a means to distort truth and a source of misguided action) to the status of being wholly condemned. If people are regarded only as machines guided by logic, as they were by these “scientistic” thinkers, rhetoric is likely to be held in low regard; for the most obvious truth about rhetoric is that it speaks to the whole person.
这道题好像很多地方都没有解，我就接在这里供GTER参考吧。

裤子李UID：3370014

pielang 发表于 2012-9-10 19:01
增补一下第九题的解答，9. The passage suggests that the disparagement of
rhetoric by some people can ...

我就是想死想不出这个题

pielangUID：3284254

裤子李 发表于 2012-9-11 13:58
我就是想死想不出这个题

恩。我一开始也是。36套毕竟是删减过的，所以很多题目难想的，就要参考下原文。