<Daily Writing >---xiaoniao123的作文贴

闫颜UID: 2788503

修改好了！！！加油！

小小消息UID: 2887537

不好意思不好意思，我改晚了，学习上有些事情耽误了，不好意思
这是15号的独立写作

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

46# 闫颜 谢谢修改啊！

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

47# 小小消息 谢谢修改啊！明天给你修改作文！

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

11.16独立作业TPO17Do youagree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.Use specific reasons and
examples to support your answer.

With the development of the society, more and more companies are trying to promote their products by advertising on the television show, or along the roads' boards, etc. However, is it the fact that most advertisements allow products look like much better than they really are? I think the answer is yes.

As the society is filled with so much commercials, and the competition among different companies is so intense that every of them tries their best to attract the consumers. One way they often use is to improve the quality of their products, and the other is to employ advertisements to make consumers buy their products. Then how to attract them? Most of them would choose the latter mean, that is, to make products more focused on consumers' eyeballs, to make them seem much better than they really are. Like the pictures in the Taobao net(a shopping centre on the internet)is beautified by using appropriate lights or PS techniques, because only in this way can the producers save more time and money
to appeal to consumers.

In fact, many advertisers with rich experience will ask the company to supply better products to them in order to give a first good impression to consumers even if the product itself is not as good as it advertises. Then we can understand why those products' are always used by a film star or TV star when the advertisements are broadcast. Perhaps the star has never used the product before, or it is not of excellent quality, but in order to allow consumers believe what they have watched, advertisements have to make products seem much better than they really are. Then it is no strange to receive a worse quality of shoes in contrast to the advertisements from the store, for example.

All in all, it is a pretty common phenomenon that most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. However, what we need to do is to appeal to more people not to buy the products which tell ties about their products. And the company itself, has to try their best in improving the inner quality of the products by learning from others or employing some advanced techniques rather than using those mess-up advertisements.

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

11.16综合作业（TPO17）In the lecture,the speaker cast douts on the claim that there will be fewer and fewer birds,she argues that the reasons in the passage to support that claim are unblievable.
First, she admits it is true that urban growth has been bad for some types of birds.But urban development actually provides better and larger habitats for other types.As a result,there are increased birds populations,which is different from the arguments referred in the reading passage.In addition,even birds like hawks can now be found in cities where they prey on the increasing populations of piegions and rottens.So it will not be an uniformed declined birds' population in the future.Some populations may decrease,but others will grow.
As for agriculture,the speaker says that it is true that the agricultural activities will increase,but not in a way assumed by the reading passage.The fact is that many incrased agriculture production have resulted from the introduction of new more productive varieties of crops,rather than using more and more land,thus the instance of the destruction of bird habitats will not happen.
Third,it is true that traditional pesticides have been destructed to birds as said in the reading passage,but the lecturer argues that it is wrong to project this history into the future.Because as people are aware of the harmful results of the traditional pestcides,two chages have occurred.One is that new and much less toxical pesticides are being developed.And more importantly,more pest-resistant crops which are genetically designed to be unappealing to pests are developed,then it will greatly reduce the need for chemical pesticides,and such kind of crop will do not harm birds at all.

liang0603UID: 3182007

基本都听出来了，xiaoniao123 好厉害！加油共勉！

海风吹过UID: 3199801

50# xiaoniao123    11.16独立作文改好了，改得有点晚，不好意思啊~

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

基本都听出来了，xiaoniao123 好厉害！加油共勉！
liang0603 发表于 2011-11-17 09:38

谢谢修改！你的我还没给你改！

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

53# 海风吹过 谢谢帮助修改！一起加油啊！我的水平也不高，不过我觉得作文通过练习是可以有很大提高的，改作文也是一种有效提高自己的方法！

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

11月17日综合TPO18
The author of the reading passage proposes three options to address the decline of Torreya.The lecturer,however,points out that none of these thress options provides satisfactory solution.
The first option is to reestablish Torreya in the same location,that is the part of Florida,as the reading passsage refers to，but the lecturer argues that the coolest,dampest areas within Torreyaed microclimate are strongly being affected by changes in the climate of larger region.Because global warming has been resulted an increasing overall temperatures in the region or wetlands through Florida have been drained.Thus,many areas across the region are becoming drier,so it is unlikely for Torreya to survive in the regional Florida microclimate.
The second solution suggested by the reading materials is to relocate Torreya far from where it grows now,which is also rejected by the lecturer.She offers an example of the black local's tree to explain his conclusion.When humans moved this kind of tree to a new environment,they spread so quickly that they killed off many plants and trees,some of which were themselves endangered,so assisted migration will yield unproducted outcomes of the new environment.
Finally the lecturer objects to preserve Torreya in research centres.That is because even if the population of Torreya trees can be kept in centres,it would probably be unable to resist the diseases.For only tree populations in the wild can satisfy the criteria of relatively large and genetically diverse,but research centres have not enough capacity,thus trees in such centres will not be able to survive disease in the long run.

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

11月17日独立11月17日独立作业101105NA  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Spending money on traveling or vacation is better than saving money forfuture.
With the development of the society,more and more people are inclined to spend money on travelling and vacation,rather than saving money for futhure.I appreacite this activity very much.
As the experience of myself,a human being is not easy to live in the society,most of us have to work to support ourselves,sometimes even have to support the whole family,everyday you have your responsibility,then from the day as you realized that you are a grown-up,you have so many sorts of things to do,thus you may have no time to enjoy everyday life in the world.As a result,spending money on traveling and vacation is meaningful,because you can use this period to stop to reflect on what the meaning of your life is,and how you can live a better or more happier life.Moreover,as you have the experience of a close contact with the nature,you may feel that you are different from yourselves in the past when standing in front of the beautiful senery.After those traveling or vacation,or after seeing the strong force of the power of nature,you may have a novel feeling about the life,and you may treasure your current life more.Take the example of an experience of myself,when I was in top of the mountain,I felt the tiny of myself in front of the nature,and I also refelcet on my life,and I have a strong eagerness to live in such peaceful life and to make my parents live live in such life,too,when I put my feet in the lake and sat there staring blankly on the bank of the lake quietly.Ater I have spent one day in that mountain and been feeling the peace of the lake in the mountain,I form my goal of the future life.
Comparing spending money on traveling and vacation,saving for future is of no value.I am sure you will feel pityful if you just save money for future,because it is filled with varieties of uncertainties in the future,especially for life.Like Forrest Gump's mother said,"Life is like a box of choclate,and you will never know what will happen in your life."Thinking that a rich man spared all his life in accumulating the wealth with great efforts,but in the end he suffered from the cancer,waht can he have achieved in all his life?Nothing!I suppose.Of course,except for money,but what is the use of these large sum of money for a dying person ?I can not imagine,neither can he eat it,nor bring it to the tomb with him.Some may argue he can leave it to his offspring,but I think it will bring about a disaster for his sons or daughters,as we may watch so many news on the TV show.Thus sparing the money in a proper way is rather important in your life,and saving for future is not a wise choice.
All in all, we should bear in mind that money is not so important for an individual,we should make ourselves happy at every interval of our life,no matter we are rich or poor,only if you  can do this,you can lead a meaningful life,and it is worthy for you to live in a life as a humankind.

liang0603UID: 3182007

57# xiaoniao123 晚上有点事，尽量明天之前给你改出来吧！PS：你交的好晚哦。

liang0603UID: 3182007

听力，我的单词都不会写。。。包括global  :mad: 和 capacity

xiaoniao123UID: 2541605

11月18日独立 20101218NA Can two people be good friends if one people has more money than the other?（这个题目好难写！）
In our everyday life we are surrounded by a variety of people.Some of the people we deal with on a daily basis are a joy to be with,and their loving presence nurtures and encourages us.Then these people can be considered as friends.In fact,it is difficult to define what is friendship.I think true friendship should not be conected with money,thus I prefer to believe that two individuals can be good friends even if one person is rich and the other is poor.
True friends should help each other.In such cases,two people,one has more money than the other are more likely to be good friends than others.Take one of  my classmates as an example,Jonh is rich and Henry is poor,but they are very good firends from rather earlier times.When Henry is lack of money,then John will borrow money to him.Whereas John is unhappy about his family,because his parents are alway qurreling with each other at home,then John will console Henry and sometimes takes him to his own home,or they play football together to forget the sorrow things,and they always do homework together,and solve fifficult problems for each other.At last,they become better and better friends.See,the friendship is no related to the money.
Moreover,good friends can not be measured by money.A good friend is someone who can share with common interests,and can be appreciated with each other by the souls,and good friends can paly togethor,and one can tell personal secrets to the other,they can trust each other so much.And in life there will always be times when we feel badly by ourselves.If a friend is around,he or she will try and cheer you up,and attempt to take your mind off whatever negative things happened.For example,my father suffered from serious sick,and I felt helpless,without the aid and console from the friends,I may not stand up to face with the misfortune.All of those are no relationships with money,and if one makes friends with you just for your money,I do not think it is the pure friendship.
Last,the rich person should not bully others just for having more money,at the same time,poor friend dhould not lose strength of character,in such cases,they are good friends,and this the great relationship.And this is much greater than the friendship with similar economical conditionsThus,the friendships between different class of people are more moving and valuable.
To sum up,two people can be good friends if one people has more money than the other,and this kind of friendship must last a longer time and be worthy of being treasured than those with identical economical conditions.