【Daily Writing作文特训小组】香草鱼的作文贴

amanda330UID: 2768793

看到了 改完传上来，我的在这https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mo ... ghlight=&page=2

香草鱼UID: 3125484

10月17日 20100925NA
Do you think that young people in today areless dependent on their parents than in the past?


Recently, the majority of people argue asif it is general phenomenon that youth are more independent that in the past,while others have divergent attitude that it's not the truth. However, theissue should be thought in various angles. As for me, I agree that young peoplenowadays are more independent with respect to the part of economy, behavior andideology.


The first and foremost things is that, moreand more young people are capable of earning money in early age, and lessdependent materially on their parents. Since these youth have grown up in a materiallyabound society, they perform more flexible and open to wealth. They know inwhat eye to look at the money and deal with it properly. What's more, therevarious consuming demands,
which youngpeople have to earn money to fulfill with, and the demand can also be a driveto independence.


In addition, young people are able andwilling to handle things themselves, and they can be independent behaviorally.As the development of Internet and communication technology, young people canobtain giant amount of information and know how to face world and life better.They often don't need parents to help them and give them advice because thecomputer can do. Also, their parents are busier than other generation when theywere children because of the society burden. These youth began to learn to beindependent as children.


Last but not least, obviously, the thoughtof today's young people are more and more mutual, and can be independent onideology. Take the example of Han Han, the widely accepted public intellect inChinese society. As he was 16 years old, he has been able to write someprofound critical articles about education and people consciousness. Now, he isyounger than 30 persist to use his voice through Internet and public situationsin order to improve the public thinking. But Han Han is just a representativeof the young generation; most of the young people have their ideology and thinkway to guide what they do.


Instance of the same sort can be multipliedindefinitely, taking into all these factors above, we may safely reach theconclusion that, young people in today are more independent no matter in economy,behavior or ideology aspect.

liang0603UID: 3182007

楼主文笔真好，羡慕，文章整体思路清晰，例子也觉得好！学习了

水晶灵514UID: 2901237

Recently, the majority of people argue as if it is general phenomenon that youth are more independent (than)that in the past, while others have(hold) divergent attitude that it's not the truth. However, the issue should be thought in various angles. As for me, I agree that young people nowadays are more independent with respect to the part of economy, behavior and ideology.
The first and foremost things is that, more and more young people are capable of earning money in early age, and less dependent materially on their parents. Since these youth have grown up in a materially abound society, they perform more flexible and open to wealth. They know in what eye to look at the money and deal with it properly. What's more, there various consuming demands, which young people have to earn money to fulfill with, and the demand can also be a drive to independence.
In addition, young people are able and willing to handle things themselves, and they can be independent behaviorally. As the development of Internet and communication technology, young people can obtain giant amount of information and know how to face world and life better. They often don't need parents to help them and give them advice because the computer can do. Also, their parents are busier than other generation(s) when they were children because of the society burden. These youth began to learn to be independent as children.
Last but not least, obviously, the thought of today's young people are more and more mutual, and can be independent on ideology. Take the example of HanHan, the widely accepted public intellect in Chinese society. As he was 16 years old, he has been able to write some profound critical articles about education and people consciousness. Now, he is younger than 30 persist to use his voice through Internet and public situation sin order to improve the public thinking. But Han Han is just a representative of the young generation; most of the young people have their ideology and think way to guide what they do.

Instance of the same sort can be multiplied indefinitely, taking into all these factors above, we may safely reach the conclusion that, young people in today are more independent no matter in economy, behavior or ideology aspect.

楼主写的挺好的，不知道该怎么改了，呵呵向你学习~

香草鱼UID: 3125484

10月18日 20100130NA
Do you agree that the government shouldsupport the scientific research even there’s no practical use?


Recently, the majority of people arguewhether government should continue to fund on research that can not be turnedinto actual application immediately. In various opinions, the main aim of thetopic is to find a proper way for society development. To be frankly, I thinkthe government should support these kinds of researches for the reason ofresearch purpose, practical discipline and science influence.


The first and foremost thing is that theresearchers do their work not just for direct application but to find asolution to a problem. When they find some problems in the field such asindustry and agriculture, they may find the problems are composed of a seriessmaller issues with interact between them. These issues can be a reasoning linkeven net, but the researchers may just focus on one of them and build some theory.Obviously, before the final answer to the big problem comes out, you can’tsometimes even imagine how the research achievements so far can be applied tothe reality. Though the factor of practical use should be taken intoconsideration indeed, in fact, as researchers, the practical use can not be themain judgment to research activity.


In addition, the government should allowsome researches that seems to be not that applicable, because we can notpredict accurately what will happen about science and in the future. Take C languagein computer science for example, which is inherited from the B language. If theAmerican government just look at the failure of the B language and stop thefund plan, how can we have so much efficient software and application in today?That is to say, you can’t tell how the result of the research at the moment canbe referred to other researches and development.


Last but not theleast, only take practical researches may promote the utilitarianism commercializationin scientific field, which have a negative influence for government. Once theutilitarianism is formed, people would by all odds to follow the practical researchesand consider what can be apply immediate and then even be profitable. Also, thetheory depth of the research would be diminished.


Taking into account of all these factors,we may reach the conclusion that it is wise for government to supportscientific researches that have even no practical use to some extent not onlybecause application should not be purpose of science and would confine scientificresearch to some degree, but also would lead to utilitarianism in field of science.

reginakishuUID: 3110732

你好哦，我是18号和你一组的~
今天有点事情，可能来不及改了 你的作文我已经存好了，明天改给你~~~
不好意思~等我哟

香草鱼UID: 3125484

10月19日 20100821NA
Some people say we should never be impoliteto another person. Do you agree or disagree?


Recently, the majority of the people argueas if it is a general truth that people should never be impolite to others,while others has the divergent attitude that in some case the politeness seemsto be unnecessary actually. The main aim to be polite is to communicate withother people in a more acceptable and comfortable way. But to be frankly, theauthor excessively emphasizes the importance of being polite, in the case offamily, work and emergency.


The first and foremost thing is that, wesometimes don't want to be much polite in our family. The function of politemanners is a series of behaviors, words, regulations that satisfy other peopleand make them comfortable, especially for strangers. However, we have beenliving with our families for about twenty years and get so familiar with themthat being polite makes it unfamiliar between our parents and us. Thus,politeness appears to be superfluous in out family life.


In addition, we sometimes forget to bepolite to others because we have something more important to cope with.Consider the example that a construction engineer is designated by the designcompany to the work place with other co-workers. Although the engineer and co-workersmay know each other and make a joke at lunch, when they focus on the design ofthe building in front of them, they even avoid a polite way to express theirideas and to do their work because these manners can obstruct theirconsideration in the working process. Politeness may make people comfortable,but can distract one's thinking.


Moreover, in emergency situations, such assaving lives in the flood, politeness may be latest thing that respect to andcomply with. That's because being polite can help the survival of people, onthe contrary, may waste the precious time for saving.


Taking into all these factors above, we maynatural conclude sometimes we do not need to be polite with others. Politenessis unnecessary in some cases such in family, work and emergency.

香草鱼UID: 3125484

It is often not a good thing to move to a new city or a new countrybecause of the lose of old friends?

Recently, the majority of people argue thatmoving to a new place even out of country have a bad side for lose of oldfriends. However, others hold a divergent opinion that it can bring some goodeffect and new friends can be known. As for my opinion, the advantage of movingto a new cityor a new country overweigh much more than the disadvantage because people canknow new culture and custom of the new place, may have better opportunities tolearn new skills and to obtain nice jobs, also can know some beneficialfriends.

The first and foremost thing advantage thatmoving to new places certainly brings about is that one will interact withpeople that live, work and think in a totally different way, which isinteresting and helpful for us. When going to the France,one will found the people there are very romantic and enthusiast, he/she canalso see some famous building like EiffelTower, Louvre Palace.Another good example is that, in France, a person will feel theirprofound emphasize about life and fashion, which will inspire his/her thoughtabout clothes, custom, culture and so on. Thus, we can see going to some newplace can give a new view that could not imagine before.

Besides, we can acquire new knowledge andskills in new place when at the same time we can find totally excitingopportunities. Sometimes a person will find there is no obvious improvementabout his life and career. It is quite wise sometimes because to some extentthe place where one stayed don't supply the factors to satisfy the needs, whichcan be success or wealth in work, achievement through career, happiness feelingabout daily life. According to my experience, most of my friends and familymembers get to a breakthrough in their own areas after moving to new sites whenconfronting with bottle neck in the old places. With the young generation'squality increase, this trend is becoming more and more intensive on the whole.

Last but not the least, one can know somenew people while he/she can yet keep communication with the old friends. Somepeople say that moving to a new location means the lose of old friends which isnot considerably wise. While this is partly true, those people exaggerate thissituation. Nevertheless, meeting some new and cute persons seems not that hard,and though a people may not be that intimidate with the old friends as before, he/shestill calls them and have a party sooner or later.

Generally, Instance of the same sort can bemultiplied indefinitely. Taking into account of all these factors, we may reachthe conclusion that it is mostly a good thing to move to a new place even a newcountry because not only you can know and learn different interest people andtheir culture and thought, but also can obtain exciting opportunities forhopeful career and good life.

xiangtuoUID: 3047550

刚上完自习回来！晚了些 不好意思！如有异议 欢迎联系！

南瓜0729UID: 3174429

不好意思 我有点事情 过一天再给你改啊。。

alohasallyUID: 2860276

改好了  10-20

香草鱼UID: 3125484

10月15日 综合写作 TPO16

    The lecturer talks about a new rule conducted by the British government that has improved the archaeology situation. He says that the content in the passage is different and somewhat inaccurate when compare to what happened for real.
    First, before a construction project begins, archaeology check process should be taken in the construction site. That is, archaeologists will examine the construction site to see if there is interest or have archaeology value. If it is an interest, then preservation plan will be carried out by the construction company and the government to decide whether build at somewhere else and document properly. This directly contradicts what is mentioned in the passage.
    Second, the construction company should pay for the archaeology action in construction project. In the process construction company should pay some fee to the archaeology preservation and other action. Thus it is a kind of fund to support archaeology research. Not only the research can be supported by adequate money, but also the government pressure will reduce. This is another part that contradicts the passage.
    Third, with the fund from the company, more job opportunities are created. Due to the money the construction companies pay to the interest preservation. The archaeologists can hire more people like the value examination, preservation plan, technology manner and collecting data. This will increase much more job opportunity. This also fights against the content in the passage that few people work in the field of archaeology find a job.

liang0603UID: 3182007

15号的写作不是TPO16么？

liang0603UID: 3182007

比我的强好多啊，感觉大多数都听出来了，但是我个人觉得，文章和lecturer 并未有contradict而是提出了一种impove的方法，所以每段的最后一句….只是我个人意见，欢迎拍砖！！！！！

香草鱼UID: 3125484

10月16日 综合写作 TPO17

    The lecturer talks about three parts which completely challenging what is mentioned in the passage. She points out that the argument in the reading passage was different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what is happening for real.
    First, the original natural home of bird is being taken place by other types of bird habits in the human area. She points out that many bird species, even some large bird feeding on meat may survive even increase in number because they can find home where people live. She also says that some bird may decline, but the number of the whole birds will definitely rise. This directly contradicts what is stated in the passage.
    Second, less land in US is used for agriculture since more efficient crops will be planted. She says that according the statitics, the crop production is increasing while the land square for agriculture is reduce due to technology. So agriculture is not the reason for reduction of birds. This is another part that contradicts passage.
    Third, pesticides do harm to many birds now does mean they will do harm to more birds in the future. On one hand, new pesticide will be adopted which will do less harm to the birds. On the other hand, the crop will crop will resist to the pest that less pesticide will put on the leaves, thus birds will be harm less, also to their reproduction. That is the final point fight against the reading material.