- 最后登录
- 2021-5-23
- 在线时间
- 1803 小时
- 寄托币
- 2498
- 声望
- 142
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-9
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 513
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1867
- UID
- 3125484
- 声望
- 142
- 寄托币
- 2498
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-9
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 513
|
0614作文:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Recently, we have so many sources of news and information, so that we cannot tell which one is the real one or who is telling the truth.
Nowadays, as the door to the new century has been knocked, we have been experiencing an information explosion ever with so many sources of news and information coming by. The majority of people start to consider whether we can distinguish the real one or telling the truth from the pool of information. In various situations, the main focus is whether people will be confused in the world and cannot find the way to the where the world really is. As for me, I would choose to believe that people have the ability and willing to tell the truth or find the real one since people are inclined to receive truth in nature and the availability of analysis method make it easier for people to find them.
The first and foremost thing we should consider is that deep in mind, we human are more willing to search and obtain truth. Knowledge and curiosity do not allow us to believe and maintain what is not real, which is the reason why so much discovery and progress has been achieved by our hands and mind. For example, as we have Internet to connect to the world, we have obtained information from all kinds of medias that more conprehensive understanding will be gained. Even though the human right situation in the the Gulf region, in Syria and Egypt have been covered for decades, we finally find out the truth. Because though the people in that region have been controlled and officially educated for many years, they want to tell the real one, they want to resume the normal order. With so many sources of news and information, other parts of the world are not misleading by media of Syria or Egypt. They choose to help after observeing, synthesizing them then concluding under their own judge. From above, both the people in and out of that region can tell reality because we have nature to believe what should be believed.
In addition, the appearance of high-tech analysis methods gives people powerful tools to distinguish who or what is right. Untruth and unreal news have some mode according to scientific study. If people want to persuade others to believe, he or she will cover the reality with some actions. With so many sources of news and information, people can use analysing mechine to examine not only the testers's behaviors in detailed such as voice changing, or arm position, but also the regular pattern in an article or a speech. A film to introduce analysis methods of FBI, when the agents want to ask to questions to find the logical errors. In stead, they ask some questions with well designing trap, and when the suspects response, the agents will not analyse the words, but to examine the comforting actions that people do to console their mind because they just tell a lie. People can also find regularity such as what the words is often used, or what the tone looks like. With improvement of analysis, it is more and more harder for people to tell a reasonable lie.
The last but not the least, while can tell which one is real one, large amount of news and information can puzzle us in some areas. Take advertisement for example, it is very normal we see the floods of advertisement to attract us to buy. However, even though most of people know the merchants exaggerate the funtions and effects of products, they would buy because with so much information without thinking about it, we may be hypnotized to believe. Thus, with oceans of news and information, we should hold our rudder of mind not to be confused.
To sum up, we may conclude safely that we can definitely distinguish truth and reality since we have the nature to believe what it really is and we have high-tech methods to help. But we also know that, without consideration, we could not face with the floods of information.
|
|