【36套题第8套】关于阅读选项的排除，求讨论

bebyondUID: 3246706

做阅读的时候，读选项总是浪费很多时间，所以想在寄托上问下基于选项排除的好方法，希望能得到大家的帮助！
下面是36套的第8套第二篇文章
Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed
boundaries and focal points—periods, countries,
dramatic events, and great leaders. It also has had clear  
Line and firm notions of scholarly procedure: how one  
5  inquires into a historical problem, how one presents and
documents one‘s findings, what constitutes admissible
and adequate proof. The recent popular psychohistory,
committed to Freudian psychoanalysis, takes a radically
different approach. This commitment precludes a  
10  commitment to history as historians have always
understood it. Psychohistory derives its ―facts‖ not from
history, the detailed records of events and their
consequences, but from psychoanalysis of the
individuals who made history, and deduces its theories   
15  not from this or that instance in their lives, but from a
view of human nature that transcends history. It denies
the basic criterion of historical evidence: that evidence
be publicly accessible to, and therefore assessable by,
all historians. Psychohistorians, convinced of the  
20  absolute rightness of their own theories, are also
convinced that theirs is the ―deepest‖ explanation of any
event that other explanations fall short of the truth.


3. The author of the passage puts the word ―deepest‖ in
   quotation marks most probably in order to   
  (A) question the usefulness of psychohistorians‘   
    insights into traditional historical scholarship   
  (B) draw attention to a contradiction in the  
    psychohistorians‘ method
  (C) emphasize the major difference between the  
    traditional historians‘ method and  
   that of psychohistorians   
  (D) disassociate her opinion of the psychohistorians‘
      claims from her opinion of their method
  (E) signal her reservations about the accuracy  
        of psychohistorians‘ claims for their work


对于第三题，题干问的是in order to，应该就是说最后一句话的目的。我直接把这道题理解成态度题了。看解答的话很多人都直接根据主干来进行判断，而我总是会对主干的信息表达的信息感到模糊，然后查找细节错误。
如题,如果用主干分析的话：我的主干分析不对。应该是V+AW+KW;而我只是：V+AW,肯定就会模糊了！！
A.question the usefulness
B.draw a contradiction
C.emphasize the difference
D.disassociate claims from method
E.signal reservation.
不知道对这个主干感到ambiguous的是不是只有我一个。因为我从题干和原文中只读到了负态度。。再往细点分析就是针对Psy' explanation的负态度。
正因为主干一看感觉都行，然后就一个个分析选项
A.psy to traditional，感觉层次不对。这里没有进行比较
B. in the psychohistorians‘ method 意思是说方法里面的内在矛盾吗？我是这么理解的从而排除
C.这个主干就可以看出有点偏了
D.同偏
E.实际上这个主语，psychohistorians' claims 是KW


红色的部分是我后来的分析，不过照那样子的话，选项也都读完了。
重申下我想得到的帮助：
这样分析可以吗？关于此题有什么更简便的方法不
对选项主干模糊是因为我主观不敏感还是客观事实？


希望能讨论下，或许这也是很多人存在的问题。