issue27 求拍

wqy316UID：3129222

27In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

    whether a greenhorn in any field will give more contribution than the experts in this field? The speaker claim so for the reason that a beginner is often more active and have more creative ideas in the mind. However, I concede that it is true that many famous discoveries were made by some freshmen, but there also great amount number of invention owed to the experienced experts.
    Indeed, beginners give great contribution in many research on all fields. For supporting example one need look no further than Gelio. Gelio prove that the speed of falling things is independent on its weight when he was only a freshman in the university. The spirit of not believing the arbit and the confident is the key to his success. Beginner, always like the young Gelio, often not afraid to doubt the famous assertation of some well-knowing people and this bravity give them freedom to think new method, which gives them a large possibility to put the technology advanced a big step.
    While we give a high raise to the beginners' effort, we should not deny that many experienced experts' great achievement. If we looking back to the human's history, it is easy to get the conclusion that so many famous theory is pronounced by a old scientist after he studyed some problem many years. The central limitation theory in Posibilities, the Nash equilibrium in the game theory, the space dividing theory in the tropology, and so on, are all based on long time research. Understandably, the abundant experience of themselves and the large amount opportunities to get the latest imformation of the science development help many experts to reach the epex of the science mountain.
    I hold the idea that the possibility to reach a goal of beginner or of expert is very similar with slight deference as we illustrated above. Consequencially, the possibility of one to success in any inqury is not depended on who they are But on the great spirit and belief he has. That is to say, If a beginner is willing to think and is not threatened by the present achivement of the so-called expert, he can create a miricle. Conversely, if a expert is proud and not want to take every effort to think about the new method, he will be a loser in the end, regardless of the adequance of knowledge and experience. Essentially, any people with the spirit of stubborn and selfconfident will made great contribution to the world no matter he is a beginner or a expert.
    In the final analysis, whether a biginner or an expert is easier to make important contribution is not depended on the years they have taken part in the field. The real golden key for the success is the great spirit of stubborn and the belief of never giving up.

shinian1987UID：2797009

whether a greenhorn in any field will give more contribution than the experts in this field? The speaker claim so for the reason that a beginner is often more active and have more creative ideas in the mind. However, I concede that it is true that many famous discoveries were made by some freshmen, but there also great amount number of invention owed to the experienced experts.
    Indeed, beginners give great contribution in many research on all fields. For supporting example one need look no further than Gelio. Gelio prove that the speed of falling things is independent on its weight when he was only a freshman in the university (Such an example is not suitable to support your opinion). The spirit of not believing the arbit and the confident is the key to his success. Beginner, always like the young Gelio, often not afraid to doubt the famous assertation of some well-knowing people and this bravity give them freedom to think new method, which gives them a large possibility to put the technology advanced a big step.
    While we give a high raise to the beginners' effort, we should not deny that many experienced experts' great achievement. If we looking back to the human's history, it is easy to get the conclusion that so many famous theory
is pronounced by a old scientist after he studyed some problem many years. The central limitation theory in Posibilities, the Nash equilibrium in the game theory, the space dividing theory in the tropology, and so on, are all based on long time research. Understandably, the abundant experience of themselves and the large amount opportunities to get the latest imformation of the science development help many experts to reach the epex of the science mountain.
    I hold the idea that the possibility to reach a goal of beginner or of expert is very similar with slight deference as we illustrated above. Consequencially, the possibility of one to success in any inqury is not depended on who they are But on the great spirit and belief he has. That is to say, If a beginner is willing to think and is not threatened by the present achivement of the so-called expert, he can create a miricle. Conversely, if a expert is proud and not want to take every effort to think about the new method, he will be a loser in the end, regardless of the adequance of knowledge and experience. Essentially, any people with the spirit of stubborn and selfconfident will made great contribution to the world no matter he is a beginner or a expert.
    In the final analysis, whether a biginner or an expert is easier to make important contribution is not depended on the years they have taken part in the field. The real golden key for the success is the great spirit of stubborn and the belief of never giving up.


语法错误太多，恕我直言，这种文章没有拍的必要。
希望LZ帖文章之前，自己先仔细检查检查，这种文章既浪费自己的时间，也浪费别人的时间。