argument 171

小葡萄唯CUID: 3103656

这道题纲应该怎么攻击呢？用手机发的，麻烦大家翻一下题库了。这道前面在说以前是禁止滑板的，后来看到M允许滑板且那里没有垃圾和损害公物问题，建议应取消禁止滑板的决定。那重点应该批判取消禁止的决定吗？该怎么写？急~~
The following appeared as a letter to the editor from the owner of a skate shop in Central Plaza.
"Two years ago the city voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for the litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza. In the past two years, however, there has only been a small increase in the number of visitors to Central Plaza, and litter and vandalism are still problematic. Skateboarding is permitted in Monroe Park, however, and there is no problem with litter or vandalism there. In order to restore Central Plaza to its former glory, then, we recommend that the city lift its prohibition on skateboarding in the plaza."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

ylhchdUID: 3055726

1两年前的情况和现在是否一样？
2人数增加的少跟玩滑板的有关？
3禁止后人数繁荣会恢复？
结论没有逻辑性