求牛牛知道作文，评个分啊！心里没底啊，还有一个星期就考了。

枕书UID: 3288618

剑4 Test3 Task2

There is a statement that governmentsshould empower creative artists to express themselves freely,while others arguegovernments should not.Personally, I am side with the former opinion.


It is evidently reasonable to argue thatcreative artists have the right to transmit their feelings to publicfreely.More precisely,it is the freedom of speaking,thinking and acting thatdifferentiate us from slaves in ancient times.Thus,as a component part of freepeople,creative artists should be authorized to compose,paint,write,and directwithout restrictions.Moreover,creative artists have their own talents in someparticular fields such as music and films.In other words,they can accomplishsome masterpieces which ordinary people cannot.But if they are confined by ourgovernments,they will fail to make a contribution which they are supposed to.So,onlyin the way without governments’ limitation can artists express themselves moreclearly and independently.


By contrast,undeniablely,we cannot overlookthe side effects of free expression.It is generally believed that the geniuscannot exist without disorders.For example,some creative artists areanti-social.What they convey to our public may pose a threat to oursociety.However,if governments take the control of art expression,what shows tous will not be the thoughts of artists but more likely be the politicians’ambition.Hence,in spite of the disadvantages of artists’ free expression,publiccan benefit from the thoughts expressed by artists because individuals arecapable of distinguishing what is right or wrong and deciding what to acceptand what to refuse.


In a conclusion,free expression has edgeover restricted expression.And I believe there will be more masterpiecescreated by artists in the future.

bqianaUID: 193168

5