Issue 82 送学生出国 求求大侠拍拍更健康哈！

zhj0735UID: 2561218

Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

么啥例子，纯粹逻辑了……

提纲：
-》.创新的想法，但是不能强行要求。
1.了解国外的文化，利于多元角度思考；更广阔的眼界；利于自我定位。
2.文化不相同，语言和文化难以适应，容易影响学业；受西方文化影响，有所反差。
3.家庭困难的学生难以支付昂贵的出国费用。
-》.可以考虑增加项目，拓宽渠道，加强融资等。

The proposal that exert requirement of learning experience abroad at least one semester sounds innovative and agreeable in the first glance, since different social background，religious culture, and social norm would broaden their horizon and redefine their life objectives. However, the economical capacity and quality of the faculty would have taken into account as well.

Wherever in Europe or in north America, it is admirable for those who want to meet their inner desire for learning in world's top universities such as Harvard or Oxford. They possess the utmost resource for knowledge and open ambience of research and design. Disciplinary like Environmental Engineering or Computer Science were dominant in the world. The protocol to send student abroad would enhance their access to gain them, and advanced fluency in English, French or Spanish as second language. Students in this way expand their linkage to the world and would develop a holistic perspective in cosmos and distinctive views of value, life and world. They would be superior to the other teenagers in their alienated experience. Most of the Party leaders share the common ground that they all certificated with superb education abroad early in Chinese history. Afterwards, the learning abroad strike hit the China ever since 1980.

Despite the above ascendants and temptation as learning abroad, there would be several pitfalls emerged in the procedure. Compare unfavorably to native students, the most serious barrier in the first place is language. Though colleges and universities precipitate the program, student would bear an extra burden to be well-qualified with oral and listening in the second language. Otherwise, learners would be bothered most by inscrutinized courses and abstruse knowledge, which is by no means the best solution to strengthen students' study. When not mature enough to resist and distinguish the essence and the dross, students would entangle themselves in a mess if not deal with culture or racial specific problem well.

In terms of the financial insurance, families in destitution could hardly afford the costly fee for study abroad, which would rather scramble for a scholarships for further study and forgo the current programs. The colleges and universities would spend more time and budget in maintenance of the relationships and exchange projects expenditure.
From all dimensions concerned, learning abroad would be a feasible option for specific major and a novel initiative for students. Whereas in contrary would engender extra onus for language mastery and economical embarrassment for provident families.