新G issue 3 35 137，第一篇，求狠狠拍

ripperseanUID: 2523263

【3】【35】【137】Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

教育机构有义务劝阻学生不要选择他们不可能取得成功的研究领域。


Recently there is an increasing blame and dispraise about education both on students, who take education and institutions, which offer education. College students are rebuked for fail fitting the job on graduating from university, while educational institutions and professors are castigated for not teaching the right curriculum to students for future working. Indeed, educational institutions are supposed to lead students to succeed, but not dampen the their passion.

If this "kindly" advice comes into being, it will lead to a paradox. At first, people want to succeed must show a great talent in a certain field which they will do a great job when they're young. Then, when studying or doing research diligently, they shall never encounter a problem or frustrated, otherwise they will be dissuaded to stay away from this field and start to step in a new one. Practically, frustration and discouragement is necessary when a man endeavor to success. No one will be successful if "kindly" advice continue as people been dissuaded busy changing their fields, then they will fall into the abysmal filled with depression and self-contempt. No one will start a real study in any field again.

On the other hand, what if every advice truly help students on their fields? Here comes to another problem: how can a professor know every detail of a number of students thoroughly and make a perfect talk to dissuade? As is known to all, anywhere in the world, students are always much larger than the teachers who educate them in quantity. And because of the limitation of a teacher’s capability, maintaining the order of class and ensuring the quality of teaching is not an easy task, let alone detecting every single student. If a teacher or professor can really dissuade their students unlikely to succeed, three conditions need to be met: first, the teacher know the exactly advantages and disadvantages of the students in the past and future; then, the teacher can predict the future of all fields in the country or even in the world; last, the teacher can wipe out any accident which will make things going wrong way. This is absolutely unavailable. Although it can't be denied that there are some teachers who could give their students useful advice which really lead them to succeed, it is naive and impractical that all teachers in the world have the ability to do this.

Practically, it is better that educational institutions tell the students in which fields they might succeed based on their hobbies and advantages. The persuasion with praise and kind leading will build a young man's precious confidence rather than telling him how he could succeed. My little brother is a typical example. Since before he went into college, he did a low grade on every single course except painting and including his parents, everyone blame him stupid and not studying diligent enough. It crushed his confidence and he failed his first College Entrancing Exam. But after that he was told that he can focus on painting and applying for art school, and after working hard a whole year, he made it at last and run a studio on decoration now. Thus, under certain conditions, advice works well.

In a conclusion, it is high risky that an educational institution dissuade a students from a field which he is unlikely to succeed. Educational institutions are established to acting like a guide who lead students to success, but not tell them the word discourage them. Yet, under certain condition, some kind advice from educational institution can be miracles.

shinian1987UID: 2797009

Recently there is an increasing blame and dispraise about education both on students, who take education and institutions, which offer education.
(Something lost?) College students are rebuked for fail fitting the job on graduating from university, while educational institutions and professors are castigated for not teaching the right curriculum to students for future working. Indeed, educational institutions are supposed to lead students to succeed, but not dampen their passion. (这一段和主题没什么关系)
If this "kindly" advice comes into being, it will lead to a paradox. At first, people want to succeed must show a great talent in a certain field which they will do a great job when they're young. Then, when studying or doing research diligently, they shall never encounter a problem or frustrated, otherwise they will be dissuaded to stay away from this field and start to step in a new one. Practically, frustration and discouragement is necessary when a man endeavor to success. No one will be successful if "kindly" advice continue as people been dissuaded busy changing their fields, then they will fall into the abysmal filled with depression and self-contempt. No one will start a real study in any field again.
On the other hand, what if every advice truly help students on their fields?
Here comes to another problem: how can a professor know every detail of a number of students thoroughly and make a perfect talk to dissuade? As is known to all, anywhere in the world, students are always much larger than the teachers who educate them in quantity. And because of the limitation of a teacher’s capability, maintaining the order of class and ensuring the quality of teaching is not an easy task, let alone detecting every single student. If a teacher or professor can really dissuade their students unlikely to succeed, three conditions need to be met: first, the teacher know the exactly advantages and disadvantages of the students in the past and future; then, the teacher can predict the future of all fields in the country or even in the world; last, the teacher can wipe out any accident which will make things going wrong way. This is absolutely unavailable. Although it can't be denied that there are some teachers who could give their students useful advice which really lead them to succeed, it is naive and impractical that all teachers in the world have the ability to do this. ( 这里讲了一大段，给人的感觉是你不是觉得这个建议不好，而是这个建议不太好操作？这种写法有点太argument了吧)

Practically, it is better that educational institutions tell the students in which fields they might succeed based on their hobbies and advantages. The persuasion with praise and kind leading will build a young man's precious confidence rather than telling him how he could succeed. My little brother is a typical example. Since before he went into college, he did a low grade on every single course except painting and including his parents, everyone blame him stupid and not studying diligent enough. It crushed his confidence and he failed his first College Entrancing Exam. But after that he was told that he can focus on painting and applying for art school, and after working hard a whole year, he made it at last and run a studio on decoration now. Thus, under certain conditions, advice works well.
In a conclusion, it is high risky that an educational institution dissuade a students from a field which he is unlikely to succeed. Educational institutions are established to acting like a guide who lead students to success, but not tell them the word discourage them. Yet, under certain condition, some kind advice from educational institution can be miracles

通观全文，基本的语法没有问题。不过给人的感觉是逻辑结构不够紧凑。句子的组织和想要表达的意思没有很好的对应。
这篇ISSUE的论证顺序；
一个人的成功与否不是简单就能被预言出来的，这方面有很多例子。因为很多研究领域需要长时间的坚持。（针对“不太可能”提出观点）
很多人做研究是出于个人的喜好，而不是想要获得什么成功，他们只是觉得自己研究的东西很有趣而已。这方面也有很多例子（针对“成功”提出观点）。
一个人该做什么不该做什么，最终的决定权在于自己。教育机构没有权力干涉别人的研究自由。教育机构应该引导学生做选择，并且鼓励和支持学生的选择。（针对“教育机构和劝阻”提出观点）
纯属个人建议。

ripperseanUID: 2523263

2# shinian1987
谢谢版主！按照您的提纲论述确实清晰多了。。。

ripperseanUID: 2523263

2# shinian1987
版主我按您说的提纲重新写了一遍，请再看看有什么问题。

The author of this issue recommends thatthere is a responsible for educational institutions to dissuade students from the fields they are unlikely to make some achievement. Although this claim maybe categorically applied in some circumstances and there needs certain modification, I generally disagree with the author. As a matter of fact, it is tough for educational institutions to dissuade students from pursuing field in which they are unlikely to succeed.

To begin with,whether a man’s can succeed in the future can’t be predicted simply by some standards, let alone perception. It is also hard for educational institutions to define “unlikely to succeed”, unless the definition is just a several terms.In that case, for example, if a student got a GPA higher than 3.5, or published two articles in journal, or wins a championship in some scholar competition, he will succeed; others will be labeled “unlikely to succeed”. But as a matter of fact, only the minority of students show their great talents during schooling,while the majority, show their capacity through a long period of time, even half a century. This works especially on many scholars and artists, who strive for a breakthrough in their fields for decades, such as Qi Bai Shi, the most famous master of traditional Chinese painting, becoming well-known when he was 60.

What's more, to some people, their motivation of researching and studying is interest of some particular field or something rather than pursuing success. To them, success and fame are just dispensable byproducts when pursuing their dreams. James Cameron, one of my favorite directors, is always chasing his dream. He loves sea, and he filmed Titanic. He loves adventure, so he built a submarine and dived in the deepest abyss in the world. His reputation is along with his pursuing what he loves, but not what so called "success". If he just wants to succeed in some way, I really doubt whether he can film this touching movie and explorer the extremely dangerous place with no profit or benefit atall.

Meanwhile, a person has the right to decide his own activity, but not replaced by parents' or teachers' wills. It is unacceptable for educational institutions to discourage their students from what they're not good at right now, while encouraging them to choose the field by themselves is strongly recommended. The right to choose is the responsible to take. In another word,when a student chose the field he likes to study, he will strive to accomplish great things. After the choosing, it is an important role of guide educational institutions play to help students succeed step by step in their fields. By doing so, confidence, strong mind and integral individual can be implanted ingrowing students, which are far more crucial than so called success.

In the final analysis, it is recommended to educational institutions that encouraging students to choose the field they like and take responsible for themselves, but not dissuading students from where they are unlikely to succeed. The most important responsible of educational institutionsis leading and building an integral individual for their students.