【独立写作】*Kelly.Zheng*作业帖~

kelly.zhengUID: 3366181

开一个作业贴，欢迎各位指正拍砖~~~一起加油！

kelly.zhengUID: 3366181

8月24日 独立作文
【Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to learn about a foreign country is to read the newspapers and magazines from that country.】

With the ways of communication developed, we increasingly gain more new information about the whole world besides our own country through varieties of way. But from my own experiences, I strongly agree with the opinion that the best way to get to know about a foreign country is to get the information from their local newspapers and magazines. I hold my viewpoint for several reasons.

First of all, reading the newspaper and magazines from the country you’re interested in is like staying at the environment you are willing to know. Oceans of information displayed on these latest media, which is a representative of the newest appearance of that country. There is no more visible approach for you, a foreigner that is miles from the continent, to know the first-hand information in the first time.

What’s more, there’s no more convenient but comprehensive way can give the better understanding of almost every aspects of that country delivered to you. When you read the newspaper and magazines, you almost get knowledge from every corner and every field of that country, which includes economic, politics, art, education, environment and even the benefit for citizens. I take myself as an example, when I was a freshman in college, the information we gain from the textbook are limited. I have a strong will of going to North America for further education, but I have almost zero knowledge of that continent. My English teacher gave me encouragement and inspired me to read some newspaper and magazines published in America. I followed her instruction and bought it from Internet. What I have read is definitely broaden my sight, I got the political and economical information from the “Times” and “Economist”, I learned geographical knowledge and extraordinary natural scenery from “National geography”. These newspaper and magazines really did a great favor when my knowledge is limited.

Last but not least, the local newspaper and magazines are written by the local journalist and citizens, which have a better understanding of their country than others. They express the political policies and economic trends in a balanced way, which is neither too subjective nor too aggressive. From my point of view, their opinion is more dependable than others.

As a whole, I hold my viewpoint of the local newspaper and magazines are the best and most effective approach for our foreigners to learn from the country we really want to know.

氢氟酸UID: 2579195

8.24 kelly.zheng 独立作文 revised by 氢氟酸.doc (31.5 KB, 下载次数: 18)

2012-8-25 07:24:50 上传

下载次数: 18

请查收

雪国90UID: 3006165

8.24 kelly.zheng 独立作文 revised by 雪国90.doc (29 KB, 下载次数: 12)

2012-8-25 16:47:18 上传

下载次数: 12

不好意思，改的太晚了，楼主过目~

kelly.zhengUID: 3366181

氢氟酸 发表于 2012-8-25 07:25
请查收

感谢修改啊~~共勉！:)

kelly.zhengUID: 3366181

雪国90 发表于 2012-8-25 16:47
不好意思，改的太晚了，楼主过目~

谢谢谢谢~~修得很仔细。刚刚能发附件了。。。马上给你传过去。。。好乌龙啊:L

kelly.zhengUID: 3366181

8月26日
【Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should not pay for the public transportation.】

As an ambiguous definition, I have to explain my understanding of “pay for”. People’s “pay for” means we give our tax to government, and our government invests public transportation by people’s taxation. Besides, “pay for” means we should buy the ticket on bus and railway. Therefore, as my point of view, we civilians should pay for the public transportation.

People, as a part of the country, have the responsibility to pay for useful needs of their daily life, including the public transportation, which is indeed part of the public facilities. We walk on street, drive on highway. What we have done is a consumption of public transportation. Therefore, when these streets and highways have to be ameliorated or reconstructed someday, it must be a great investment. If all this consumption should pay by government itself only, without people’s taxation, the government might have a great financial deficit problem which we all wouldn’t want it happened. As far as I’m concerned, the combination of right and responsibility should be both seen on the people’s shoulders simultaneously.

Admittedly, free of public transportation means more people will choose public transport equipment like bus or railway when they go out, which will be a relief of environment contamination and traffic jam. But, things always have two sides like the double-edge sword. When the “free ticket” policy comes to public, a great number of people will crowd into the railway station, and bus station, especially in a city with large number of population. When these situations happen, another way of traffic jam simultaneously will show on public transportation spots. I’ll illustrate my city as an example. I live in Beijing, which is a city famous for public welfare in China. The ticket here is very cheap even though it is not free. As a consequence, the most crowded place in this city is definitely the bus station and railway station, let alone when the ticket is free someday. Free public transportation did not release the pressure on people’s daily traveling, but in turn it makes all the citizens live in a stressed and congested transportation situation.

To sum up briefly, public transportation should be paid by government, as well as we people who live this country. Not only because it is our responsibility to sacrifice for this country, but also for not being into a vicious cycle of increasing the pressure of public transportation.

heverywhereUID: 3063914

0826已改，请查收
0826-Kelly.zheng-rev heverywhere.doc (34 KB, 下载次数: 5)

2012-8-27 10:08:43 上传

下载次数: 5

kelly.zhengUID: 3366181

0827作文：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The growth of cities is positive for our society.

With the great technology revolution happened, the whole world involved into a dramatic change, especially in the way of urbanization. There might be a debate between whether the growth of cities is positive for our society or not. Granted, we have seen much scenario of over-urbanization, which promoting the cities welfare as well as destroying the local civilization. But, what we know definitely is the irreversible steps of marching into a new world, and that must be the growth cities instead of the old one. Also, I take my viewpoint of the positive effect for these following reasons.

First, the process of a city’s growth is a process of increasing on economic field. What we certainly know is the enlarged capitalization will accompany with so many companies raise up. Therefore, the government as well as the citizens will not worry about the unemployment rate. More companies rise, more jobs will be provided. And, that must be a great beneficial to employees who live in the city.

Also, as we know, the government is willing to absorb more company and capital into the city. It means more tax income which will benefit the construction of infrastructure and guarantee the social welfare; correspondingly, the quality of education and medical level will be dramatically increased. What’s more, the concomitant beneficial effect cannot be ignored, either. A mature developed city will take the opportunity and become the central of this area, like the Pudong special zone in China.
What’s more, the way of life is quite different in a developed city than in others. People have much fun in it. The developed museum, super mall, great facilitated gym, and even some night bar fulfill all kinds of requirements of people who live in the city, which can not be satisfied in a non-growth one. Also, people in the growth and developed city will definitely have a big vision of future. They have seen more of the world, and they will have a bigger blueprint about the world.

To sum up briefly, even it might be inevitably destroy some old fashion we love; we should focus on the positive influence accompanied by the growth of cities. It is really what we need, and it is really the times need.

kelly.zhengUID: 3366181

heverywhere 发表于 2012-8-27 10:09
0826已改，请查收

很感谢你的修改啊，对我帮助很大~~:lol
PS，还要问一下你的文档里那种修改格式是怎么弄的呀，就是在既定的一篇文章上再输入个什么东西，它就自动变成别的颜色和修改格式了？好高端。。。

heverywhereUID: 3063914

kelly.zheng 发表于 2012-8-27 10:50
很感谢你的修改啊，对我帮助很大~~
PS，还要问一下你的文档里那种修改格式是怎么弄的呀，就是在既定 ...

不客气啊，多交流，都是互相帮助共同提高~~~
那个修改方法是点审阅里的修订~

訢宇UID: 3310389

对不起啊，发的太晚了。已改，请过目 8.26 Kelly.zheng已改.doc (25.5 KB, 下载次数: 1)

2012-8-27 20:50:46 上传

下载次数: 1

我的也写完了，戳这里https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mo ... amp;fromuid=3310389[/url]

JoanHsiaoUID: 3315776

0827作文，已修改，过目之~

0827 Kelly.zheng revised by Joan.doc (30.5 KB, 下载次数: 3)

2012-8-28 20:32:56 上传

下载次数: 3

我的作业晚些奉上^^

alexcuiUID: 3365616

kelly.zheng 发表于 2012-8-27 10:50
很感谢你的修改啊，对我帮助很大~~
PS，还要问一下你的文档里那种修改格式是怎么弄的呀，就是在既定 ...

0827 Kelly.zheng revived by alexcui.doc (31 KB, 下载次数: 2)

2012-8-29 01:39:09 上传

下载次数: 2

工作原因，晚了，抱歉

kelly.zhengUID: 3366181

8月29日作文
[Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays, working at home is better than working in office.]

Work at home, or in office? That is a difficult question. Considering the varieties type of work, people have more options for choosing their work position. Commonly, like most “white colors” in our city, the position people work usually located in a tall building, they commute by public transportation or their own car. We call it “working in office”. Correspondingly, people stay at home doing their business and dealing with their social relationship is a counterpart, which have a new fashion name called “SOHO Man”. Compared with these two approaches, I prefer to work at home and being a “SOHO Man”. I hold my position for these following reasons.

First of all, serious traffic problem is occupying one of the TOP five main problems of modern city. Working in office means we have to contribute our valuable time to the long distance of commutation and the mass transit. Like the city I live in----Beijing. If you lucky enough, you can find a job just nearby your residence. However, majority people were not so lucky, since increasingly amount of people trapped in the big problem of traffic. They spend 2 or even more hours in the way of going work and going back. The deep pressure on them not only from the work problems, but also from the burden when they take bus or subway, pushed and squeezed by the crowd. So, working at home can be an efficient way.

What’s more, working at home can be more flexible, and it’s more fit to some particular jobs, such as the painter, designer, even the programmer. Sometimes, even a 24-hour work system cannot fulfill the specific requirements of these jobs when the case is top emergency, but sometimes no case would be demanded. They really need a more flexible time for their floating arrangement and a relax work place instead of the squared office, which would enlighten inspirations of them. Nowadays, the increasing number of work studio is an extension way for “SOHO man”, of which cannot be defined as home, nevertheless, it’s really just like home.

To be concluded briefly, obviously, in this rushing-time, working at home can be more efficient and effective way, people save more time on commuting everyday and do more work, and have conferences and communications on line. Meanwhile, working at home is more suitable for freestyle job, whatever in time or place.