10.3作文:Some people think that a university professor should focus time on doing research, while others think that the main role of a professor is to educate students in a university. What is your opinion and why? (Education)
Human resource is considered as the most valuable resource in the 21 century. At the same time, education is the essential part of a country since high educated people are the key who are able to devote themselves to contribute the nation. Some people believe doing research is relatively more important than educated students for professors while others oppose it. Personally speaking, I strongly agree that professor should concentrate more on educating undergraduates than doing research.
In the first place, the basic mission for professors is educating students. Even though an increasing number of professors are more willing to do research in the new fields because it seems attractive and also brings a lot reward to them, admittedly prerequisite of development for a country is to keep the technology and knowledge from disappearing then development. Therefore, educating is the most fundamental way in which our knowledge and technology could be passed on the next generation easily. Moreover doing research or study in new fields also can brings out some breakthrough improving our life tendency under this necessary condition. Just like building a house, the more stability the basement is, the higher the building could be.
Furthermore, education enables students to acquire knowledge and skill in order to contribute to the country’s constructions quickly. Once the ones obtaining enough skills and knowledge they could also study the new domain of science with the professors, they could be best assistants, the best is maybe they will also do researches and make much breakthrough in the new fields. A bunch of scientists including some famous ancestors, one reason they invented significant devices and improve our life tendency is they got educated and their schoolwork was well done initially which enabled them full of varieties of knowledge enforcing their abilities to do research. So educating students is necessary for professors compared with research to create more scientists to devote themselves into doing research.
Last but not least, it affects the students to get educated if professors concentrate more on the research. Maybe that would cost their too much to teach their students accurately. There are some professors in the universities who are only doing researches and never teach students, since they don’t have enough energy to do other teaching. We can learn from that if professors are both teaching and doing researches, the two sides may hold on each other, and impact the other side negatively.
To sum up, when taken all the circumstances, I insist that the main role for professors is educating students but doing researches.
10.4作文:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: People can learn more from watching television than by reading books. (Leisure)
With economic develops quickly, high speed developed technology enables people to get a bunch of excellent inventions which improve our life tendency. Television, one of the most popular products, has become more competitive than book, which lead a controversy that which one of them you could learn or benefit more from. Personally speaking, I strongly agree the statement that people can learn more from TV than books.
In the first place, televisions contain much more knowledge than books and could teach us something we want more precisely. There are various programs in TV, such as sports channel, news, fashion, entertainment even some skills for daily life. However, we could never enjoy all of them in one book. It seems more convenient for people to familiar themselves with what they are interested in by television. We won’t have to go to the library to check out something and read the material which is more complex. Take my mother as an example, she was interested in cooking very much, so she bought a great number of books which taught people how to cook. Then someday there was a cooking program on TV, and the program was attractive for her since she could do the same step with the famous cook on TV which was more precisely and interesting than book. As a result, all of the book were just placed there and never used again.
In addition, televisions are more dynamic than books, which is more interesting to enable us learn more than books. The fiction book supply people with a specific detail while the television enables us to enjoy the dynamic and fantastic scene. We never feel boring to watch TV however we may feel exhausted and tired when we read a book even though it is attractive. So in my opinion, TV is a wonderful way to relax, but book just cost me a lot of energy.
Furthermore, people can do something else as the same time watch television. For instance, I like watching TV when I am eating, so I just need to turn on the TV and select my channel, then enjoy eating and watching TV. But we can’t do the same things when we are reading books because we must turn to the page constantly. Under this circumstance, TV is more convenient for us. Moreover, there are an increasing number of TV programs that to review the masterpiece or some books which may replace the books sometimes.
To sum up, when taking all of the programs, functional advantage and convenience, it seems better for people to learn more on television than book.
10.5作文.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays, it is much easier for a person to achieve success without family's help than in the past. Use specific reasons to support your answer
With economy growing rapidly, high speed developing technology improves our life tendency. At the same time, it seems that the human resource has been the most valuable resource in the past few years. Is that mean that people get access to success more easily than in the past. Personally speaking, without family’s help, I strongly agree that it is much easier for a person to achieve success than in the past.
In the first place, there seem much more opportunities to reach one’s goal under the relatively prosperous modern world than before. Especially a bunch of internet companies have emerged which are really lack workers and entrepreneurs to lead the enterprises getting further development. Admittedly, these new companies provide many vacant vocations to people which are important chances to be successful. Take Steve jobs as an example, the ex-CEO of the APPLE company. He born in a abnormal family, his mother was still a undergraduate when pregnant. Then he was nurtured by a couple of people who promised to make him get a undergraduate degree. However he gave up his study in the middle of university. Finally, he was interested in the electronic devices and lead the APPLE toward the top of the electron company in the world. But if he lived in the past, there must have no chance for him to do such an excellent progress.
In addition, education is more complete and advance than the past. It is easier for people to receive better education and equip ourselves with variety of knowledge, which improve our abilities and contribute to success. In the contrary, our ancestors just only cared about their safety and self support, they had too less skills to survive not mention the spiritual dream, as a result, there was no enough energy and time to make their dreams come true since they couldn’t get rid of poverty. However nowadays, people won’t worry about the basic necessary to survive and they could make our best to pursue our dreams. Moreover the complete education enables us to improve ourselves better and make it easier to fulfill our dreams and be successful.
To sum up, when taking the opportunities in modern life and the education we receive into consideration, it seems much easier for people to get successful independently nowadays than in the past.