Issue 60 Politics 怎么破题

2006117935UID：2676585

求助：

60. Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
政治家应该寻求共同点和理性的一致，而不是深奥的理想。

这个题目一点思路都没有啊。

谢谢大家！

咖啡盐UID：2973669

重视现实还是重视理想。

2006117935UID：2676585

好吧我自问自答，解读这个题目是不是可以这样想
I believe it means that politicians should look to find a solution that satisfies the general good rather than sticking with their ideals. For example, right now we have the problem of raising taxes or not. There are people who say that their [elusive] idea is that we should not raise taxes on anyone anywhere. If we don't raise taxes, the US deficit will be too high and could cause the country to go bankrupt. Others say that we have to raise taxes a little (and maybe only on some people) to prevent a bankruptcy. Those who hold the latter view so that we need to do it for the common good--to prevent the country going bankrupt. Obama originally proposed raising taxes on people making $250,000 a year or more. Now, for the "common good," he changed it to $400,000. Those who say that no taxes should be raised (NO MATTER WHAT) are sticking to their ideals and say NO new taxes no matter what.
Or take the issue of abortion. Some say, no abortion, no matter what. Not even if the mother's life is in danger. Others say that abortion should be legal no matter what. Common ground might say that abortion is okay if the mother's life is in danger, if the baby will be totally malformed, or up to five months.
I personally believe in looking for common ground that benefits us all.
Think of the issue of smoking. Some say no smoking under any circumstances. Others say that they have the right to smoke anytime, anywhere. The compromise that we have now is that you cannot smoke in restaurants, schools, stores, and some other places, but you can smoke in your home and outside. That was a consensus arrived at after many years of arguing.

心事付瑶琴UID：2727285

乌托邦、保守主义
如果不愿举共产主义国家的例子（我的常规武器），可以比较英国和法国。后者是人类利用理性建构政体的典型范例（法国大革命），但却只换来了无数的人头落地和新的专制（拿破仑）