寄托天下
查看: 3963|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[问题求助] Issue 60 Politics 怎么破题 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
32
寄托币
143
注册时间
2009-8-3
精华
0
帖子
47
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-12-26 07:30:42 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
求助:

60. Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
政治家应该寻求共同点和理性的一致,而不是深奥的理想。

这个题目一点思路都没有啊。

谢谢大家!
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1556
寄托币
29103
注册时间
2010-12-13
精华
2
帖子
1066

荣誉版主 Sagittarius射手座 寄托优秀版主 GRE斩浪之魂 AW作文修改奖 枫华正茂 魅丽星 爱美星 德意志之心

沙发
发表于 2012-12-26 11:17:39 |只看该作者
重视现实还是重视理想。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
32
寄托币
143
注册时间
2009-8-3
精华
0
帖子
47
板凳
发表于 2012-12-26 11:25:47 |只看该作者
好吧我自问自答,解读这个题目是不是可以这样想
I believe it means that politicians should look to find a solution that satisfies the general good rather than sticking with their ideals. For example, right now we have the problem of raising taxes or not. There are people who say that their [elusive] idea is that we should not raise taxes on anyone anywhere. If we don't raise taxes, the US deficit will be too high and could cause the country to go bankrupt. Others say that we have to raise taxes a little (and maybe only on some people) to prevent a bankruptcy. Those who hold the latter view so that we need to do it for the common good--to prevent the country going bankrupt. Obama originally proposed raising taxes on people making $250,000 a year or more. Now, for the "common good," he changed it to $400,000. Those who say that no taxes should be raised (NO MATTER WHAT) are sticking to their ideals and say NO new taxes no matter what.
Or take the issue of abortion. Some say, no abortion, no matter what. Not even if the mother's life is in danger. Others say that abortion should be legal no matter what. Common ground might say that abortion is okay if the mother's life is in danger, if the baby will be totally malformed, or up to five months.
I personally believe in looking for common ground that benefits us all.
Think of the issue of smoking. Some say no smoking under any circumstances. Others say that they have the right to smoke anytime, anywhere. The compromise that we have now is that you cannot smoke in restaurants, schools, stores, and some other places, but you can smoke in your home and outside. That was a consensus arrived at after many years of arguing.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

声望
332
寄托币
3149
注册时间
2009-11-17
精华
1
帖子
983

Economist US-applicant 寄托兑换店纪念章 荣誉版主

地板
发表于 2012-12-26 18:51:21 |只看该作者
乌托邦、保守主义
如果不愿举共产主义国家的例子(我的常规武器),可以比较英国和法国。后者是人类利用理性建构政体的典型范例(法国大革命),但却只换来了无数的人头落地和新的专制(拿破仑)

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue 60 Politics 怎么破题 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue 60 Politics 怎么破题
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1488038-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部