- 最后登录
- 2016-3-15
- 在线时间
- 1081 小时
- 寄托币
- 7618
- 声望
- 945
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-16
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 1165
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 4984
- UID
- 3130718
- 声望
- 945
- 寄托币
- 7618
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-16
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 1165
|
本帖最后由 SYNCIA 于 2013-2-24 10:59 编辑
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To make children to perform well at school, parents should limit the hours that a child spends on watching TV. Use specific reasons to support your answer.
ID: 薛定谔的喵
In the huge explosion of media, more and more people including the ages, the adults even the children choose watching TV as their part-time entertainment. However, to(for) the children who don’t perform well at school, things are not that easy (What’s the meaning of “that easy”, sort of Chinglish ). TV often becomes( Grammar mistake, gradually becomes) the arch-criminal when parents criticize the terrible grades of their children. But in my opinion, watching TV has nothing negative to do with children’s performance at school. (Stand point) There are two reasons I will expound below.
First of all, children can learn various kinds of extracurricular knowledge during the progress in (of) enjoying the programs on television. Though,(deleted) in school children can learn much basic knowledge, such as math, science and literary, these kinds of knowledge are always vapidity (vapid) and abstract which can’t draw children’s attention to them. Oppositely, when children are watching TV, they are able to come into contact with interesting and picturesque knowledge without heavy pressure in school. This way of learning can help children to learn faster and remember longer. For example, when a child read an article which describes about elephant’s behaviors, it is hard for he or she to image (imagine) what such behaviors look like. However, if parents let child watch a short documentary film about elephants, that problem will be solved. That is why even in some modern school, TV is used as an educational tool. That is to say, watching TV is a way of learning. There is no reason for parents to limit the time that children spend on learning on TV.
Secondly,as far as I am concerned, building right sense of time for children is more important than simply limiting the hours they spend on TV. T(; t)hat is to say, children have rights to decide their own life, and parents can only give advises (advice [Un]) but(not the) limitations about their children. If parents only simply and roughly decrease the time their children’s (deleted) TV time, on one hand, it may cut off an efficient way for children to learn. (,)On the other hand, if one day children lose this kind of limitation from their parents, they may feel confused about arranging their lives without right sense of time which has huge damage for their school performance. To conclude, parents had better give some advice (too abstract) instead of limiting their children’s TV time.
Based on the reasons above, in order to help learn more (knowledge) and set up good sense of time, it is wise for parents not to limit hours that children spend on TV.
点评:
1. Stand point: 明确,粉色部分
2. Organization:
总论点: 看电视不会对孩子产生学习方面的消极影响,故,没有必要限制孩子看电视的时间;
分论点一: 看电视可以提供一个更快更好的学习平台;
分论点二: 建立良好的时间观念比单纯限制孩子时间好。
以上论点独立来看都是好论点,但是从逻辑上看,衔接得比较差。 电视除了扮演一个学习平台的同时,同样也充斥着不必要的电视垃圾; 建立良好的时间观念本身是没有问题,可是,不限制孩子的电视时间就能培养他的时间观念? 这说不通吧? 作者在第二个论点处多次强调give some advice, 可是,具体的建议是些什么,也并不明白。 所以,个人认为,作者在树立总论点的时候,没有必要下一个断言说电视没有学习方面的消极影响,而可以跳过这个点,来分类讨论,对于年纪比较小的孩子,要限制时间; 对于年纪比较大的孩子,自身也有一定的判断和自律,就大可不必限制他的时间,以免产生更严重的逆反行为。
3. Development:
分论点一: 发展较好。说明电视和课本的区别,并以大象举例子;
分论点二: 发展不足。作者并没有具体说明时间观念的培养中”不限制电视时间”的积极作用,而只是模糊说,父母管的话,孩子以后不知道怎么管理自己。可是这是一个很薄弱的论点。 父母作为孩子的引导者,如果不做限制和教育,那非常影响一个孩子未来对于事情的判断。
4. Language:
具体的修改都标注在括号里面,参见橘色部分。
这里说两点,一是标点符号。 在英文写作中,只要你的整个句子还未完成,要学会用分号;慎用句号。
二是词形变化。这方面要多积累,动词,形容词,名词形式注意不要混淆。 |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 20
声望 + 10
查看全部投币
|