寄托天下
查看: 1956|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[美国&加拿大] 那到底黨員申請HLS要不要標榜自己是個Communist? [复制链接]

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
2085
寄托币
2914
注册时间
2009-9-1
精华
4
帖子
202

荣誉版主 Golden Apple

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-2-26 11:34:35 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
February 23, 2013
Ted Cruz Responds—And Still Sees Red at Harvard Law
Posted by Jane Mayer



Senator Ted Cruz has responded to The New Yorker’s report that he accused Harvard Law School of having had “twelve” Communists who “believed in the overthrow of the U.S. Government” on its faculty when he attended in the early nineties. Cruz doesn’t deny that he said this; instead, through his spokesman, he says he was right: Harvard Law was full of Communists.

His spokeswoman Catherine Frazier told The Blaze website that the “substantive point” in Cruz’s charge, made in a speech in 2010, was “was absolutely correct.”

She went on to explain that “the Harvard Law School faculty included numerous self-described proponents of ‘critical legal studies’—a school of thought explicitly derived from Marxism—and they far outnumbered Republicans.” As my story noted, the Critical Legal Studies group consisted of left-leaning professors like Duncan Kennedy, who is a social democrat, not a Communist, and has never “believed in the overthrow of the U.S. Government.”

Among those who have taken issue with Cruz’s castigation of the Harvard Law School faculty are his former law professor, Charles Fried, who is a well-known Republican and former Solicitor General to Ronald Reagan. In his 2010 speech, Cruz had said there was only “one” Republican on the faculty, but his former professor, Fried, told The New Yorker there were at least four, including himself. A spokesman for Harvard Law School, Robb London, also described the school as “puzzled” by Cruz’s allegations.

Cruz’s spokesman called it “curious” that The New Yorker would cover Cruz’s speech “three years” after he gave it. But Cruz’s hostile questioning of Obama’s nominee for Defense Secretary, Chuck Hagel, and insinuations about Hagel’s loyalties had provided a fresh context for looking more closely at the nature of the accusations he has leveled at political opponents. Observers like Senator Barbara Boxer wondered if they were seeing a revival of McCarthyism. Cruz’s speech—and, now, his acknowledgement of it—will only add to the discussion. His spokeswoman didn’t address that question.

Photograph by Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call/Getty.

Source: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/02/ted-cruz-responds-harvard-law-was-full-of-communists.html

已有 1 人评分寄托币 收起 理由
阿泰 + 40 赞一个!

总评分: 寄托币 + 40   查看全部投币

0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
225
寄托币
974
注册时间
2012-10-27
精华
1
帖子
181
沙发
发表于 2013-2-26 14:55:33 |只看该作者
感觉这哥们儿的签名应该比你多一个K,当然也是狠角色,不过似乎满political的。

使用道具 举报

RE: 那到底黨員申請HLS要不要標榜自己是個Communist? [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
那到底黨員申請HLS要不要標榜自己是個Communist?
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1498800-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部