寄托天下
查看: 2219|回复: 2

[优秀习作] Issue1 请提意见, 写得很慢,但愿质量令人满意。 [复制链接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
7
寄托币
8907
注册时间
2004-1-6
精华
5
帖子
9
发表于 2004-1-6 15:03:30 |显示全部楼层
Issue 96
"We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own."

I agree that we humans have a nature that we are more willing to go with people having similar ideas to ours than with those often standing against us, for we are not strong enough to love debating although we will find benefit from such disagreeable act. Attempting to justify this instinct of weakness by a pretext that "we can learn much more from people whose views we share", however, never makes a realistic and self-dependent person who is able to face the unavoidable obstructions on his way to truths and happiness. I would be hard-pressed to agree on belittling what we can learn from challenges, objections and even attacks.

Perhaps one can list out many good points of learning with someone who is glad to nod and say "I think so". Above all, that undoubtedly will afford you much pleasure which will put your study on and on. And you will save considerable time and labour thanks for your partner who can relay the conversation whenever you pause for a breath. If you haven't think of anything on the subject that you're sharing, your partner also may add or complement an good idea. You are likely to feel very satisfied by the smoothness and speed of your study; at least, so it seems at the beginning.

When you plan to dive deeper in the subject you're on, however, a parrot-like companion will prove of little help. As a matter of fact, remaining along with him or her can only keep you staying in the upper ocean and therefore away from amazing pictures at the bottom. I should point out the contrast between learning with someone and learning from someone. Learning, at the bottom, is firstly seeking new useful ideas. Too many similarities bespeak too few different opinions. What on earth can you learn from one like yourself?  Now it is a disputer that can make you sink, in an uncomfortable but effective manner.

Knowledge is fruit of study and study grows on the earth of reality. By learning we exact useful essence of abstract ideas from variable phenomena. And the aim of study is to apply the ideas as tools in our lives. Knowledge comes from and goes back to the real world that never adulates or compliments us. We have to admit the fundamentality of and have loyalty to the facts, the root and end of our study. In this sense, an objector can help you a lot by occasionally shouting "you're wrong" on behalf of the real world.

Unless you wake up by objections from a dream that you are weaving for your own subjectivity, you won't get objective enough to discover the truth. Indeed, disputers are subjective and arbitrary as well as you are, and many of their ideas with little or no basis of fact are worthless. This, which also is a fact, doesn't mean you can just ignore or avert them, however. Think it in a different way and you'll recognize that this fact keeps reminding you of what you would look like in others eyes if you go on clinging to your own corner from where you assumed you could see the whole world thoroughly.

"In disputations gets truth clearer." Another point of view offers you an eye to see the back of the moon. The more directions you take to observe and analyze a subject, the more you will learn about it. And to beat objections, you are forced to build and consolidate the ground of your view with proofs and logics, which boost you much further in learning than when you are agreed with and contented.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 16Rank: 16Rank: 16Rank: 16

声望
266
寄托币
22475
注册时间
2003-7-14
精华
88
帖子
188

荣誉版主 Sub luck

发表于 2004-1-7 13:42:15 |显示全部楼层
will prove of little help. 改成will prove to be of little help
remaining along with的用法需要商量
语言上的问题不是很多,没有一一改。

第一段那个attempting to justify by a pretext, however的句子主体结构写得漂亮,但是第一段里面所有的句子都有一个毛病:绕,而且绕不清楚。前后的对应和用词可能有不舒服的地方,要改。

两天没上来结果发了好几篇issue1,这一篇是最好的,但是也有问题。总论点很清楚(虽然那个什么would be hard-pressed to agree on belittling 也绕了半天),前后的意图也看得出来。但是弱在了论证上,仍然是陈述多,论证不够。能够把learn from和learn with提出来看得出来你的概念还比较清晰,优点,但是没有能够就这一点展开说。而后面的knowledge和原题的联系却没有能够提及。至于说到subjectivity和disagreement的关系,恐怕在这里你的概念就没那么清楚了,缺乏必要的衔接和阐明。

陈述多论证不够这个是这几篇的通病,去精华区和习题库看看前人的总结,要避免这种问题。继续写的时候要多注意.

在作文版发帖子的时候,请注意到基本的格式要求。https://bbs.gter.net/announcement.php?s=&forumid=23  这些事情说过很多次了。而且这个题目是issue1,不知道你为什么会写issue96,题号的排序在公告里面也有,请自行确认。我可不想每次上来第一件事都是给作文帖子对题号改标题格式。

也希望你多多参与这里的讨论,交流拓展思路,给别人的文章提提意见,不要有“怕mislead别人”之类的顾虑,参与和交流会帮助自己提高的,帮助别人也帮助自己。我觉得你的语言和逻辑功底都还不错,也希望你多和大家交流,帮助帮助别人。热心的网友会得到其他网友和斑竹的优先关注哦 ^_^
Rien de réel ne peut être menacé.
Rien d'irréel n'existe.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
7
寄托币
8907
注册时间
2004-1-6
精华
5
帖子
9
发表于 2004-1-7 17:26:03 |显示全部楼层
非常感谢imong的认真的评论和中肯的意见。我一学期没有写英语文章了,读的也很少,只有《HarryPotter》英文版而已。其实我即使写中文文章也有些obscure得不好倾向,的确要改。
另外我发帖之前没先读公告,实在抱歉。

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue1 请提意见, 写得很慢,但愿质量令人满意。 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue1 请提意见, 写得很慢,但愿质量令人满意。
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-159956-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部