OG 321页的这道逻辑题终于搞懂了！！

大狒狒_小狒狒UID: 3327460

先贴个原题：
Sparva, unlike Treland’s other provinces, requires automobile insurers to pay for any
medical treatment sought by someone who has been involved in an accident; in the
other provinces, insurers pay for nonemergency treatment only if they preapprove the
treatment. Clearly, Sparva’s less restrictive policy must be the explanation for the fact
that altogether insurers there pay for far more treatments after accidents than insurers
in other provinces, even though Sparva does not have the largest population.


7. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A Car insurance costs more in Sparva than in any other province.
B The cost of medical care in Sparva is higher than the national average.
C Different insurance companies have different standards for determining
what constitutes emergency treatment.
D Fewer insurance companies operate in Sparva than in any other province.
E There are fewer traffic accidents annually in Sparva than in any of the
provinces of comparable or greater population.

看了各大论坛里对着道题的解释都觉得解释不通，大多数有问题的人几乎都把题目看成了S地保险公司的赔偿钱数比其他地方多。我就想不通了，题干中压根就没讲是个人赔付钱数多呢还是总体钱数多，而这就会导致完全相反的结论。

仔细审题之后才发现题干说的是赔付的案例数S地多与其他地“ Clearly, Sparva’s less restrictive policy must be the explanation for the fact
that altogether insurers there pay for far more treatments after accidents than insurers
in other provinces,”
与赔付钱数压根就没关系。

这下E项就不能显然更多了。

发现逻辑题问题多半出现在题干理解上。