- 最后登录
- 2008-4-14
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 2351
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2003-6-19
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1074
- UID
- 137677

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 2351
- 注册时间
- 2003-6-19
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
Do you contemplate consciously why university adopts the present way to fulfill its hallowed obligation to cultivate students who are the future hope(future可以不要,因为hope本身表示未来) of societies(societies’) development and shouldering the significandt(significant) resposibilities (responsibilities)? Many present that university should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. In my opinion, it is ,at least, a superficial assessment which is ostensibly rational, but actually arbitrary.
This requirement of univesity (university)on students may make them increasingly passive during their study experiences and fail to devote their energy and efforts to learning their favorite fields of study. On the one hand(on one hand), since the saying "Interest is one's best teacher" has been recognized as an accredited axiom, requiring every student to take many irrelevant curricula to their beloved majors is sure to make students lose their activities to study. Even some courses, which are the very detestable fractions , can make this requirement turn out to be counterproductive.That is to say, the way acquring (acquiring)knowledge of various academic disciplines won't make students become truly educated, instead, students will lose their interests to acquire any fields of knowledge , even their original favorite majors. On the other hand, even if students remain their strong appetites to studying(study) their key and preferred curricula successfully, they have had little redundent (redundant)energy and time to care them for the sake of their time's being occupied by thoes (those)varied courses outside their fields of study. In a word, from the perspective of some students, detriment of the way outstripes (outstrips)benefit.
For different students, university should require them to take courses distinctively. This era, which is sometimes portayed (portrayed)as dominated by the experience of change at break-neck speed, increasingly needs both specialists and generalists. It is associated with the university's educational way tightly(closely). For the students who are unambiguous to their majors they will pursue and engage in the future, university should allow them to choose the relevant and useful curricula self-directely. They should become the targets of college education to the specialists. And for the students who haven't decide what professions they want follow indeed hereafter, university should offer a variety of courses outsite (outside)their fields of study which are chosen temporarily or passively(?). Facing to so many diverse fields of study, I believe these students will find their beloved majors. What’s more, these varied curricula can broad the students' scope of knowledge unnotely(?), and make students touch on various academic realms thoughly (thoroughly). At the same time, it makes preparation for cultivating the future generalists.
In a summary, the way requiring every student to take a variety of courses prove impractial (impractical). Everything are(is) different in the world, so students are not exception. There will be a better effect, provided university adopts different educational ways on different students. |
|