- 最后登录
- 2024-7-7
- 在线时间
- 239 小时
- 寄托币
- 930
- 声望
- 104
- 注册时间
- 2013-6-15
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 146
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 582
- UID
- 3445586

- 声望
- 104
- 寄托币
- 930
- 注册时间
- 2013-6-15
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 146
|
ヤ.魔ポ☆. 发表于 2013-10-5 16:00 ![]()
哈 我也不确定我说的都是对的 总之自己改改吧~
加油加油~
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To achieve successful
development of a country, a government should spend more money on young
children’s education rather than on universities.
1.虽然一个人的品质都是从小时候开始塑造的,但儿童教育无需用到大量的资金,更多的是 个人的努力和天分
2.大学的教学需要更多资金,例如生物和物理学,需要大量金钱去构建实验室,购买实验设备,还能研究出很多东西直接回馈社会,相比儿童教育要10,20年后才能收到报酬,这更直接
The education plays an indispensable role in the development of a country.But there is still much discussions revolving whether a government should spend more money on young children’s education rather than on universities.Indeed,The future of a people is based on the young children’s education.However,spending more money on universities has often turns out to be the better decision.In the essay,I will compare two typical views regarding the issue.
It’s evident that the successful development of a country is based on the the success of citizens.Admittedly,The young children’s education contributes greatly to a successful life.But unlike universities,it does not need a lot of funds.As we know,the facilities of primary schools in poor areas were outdated because governments have no enough money to upgrade them.Under these conditions,many people from these poor areas still become successful.For instance,Newton used to study in the primary school of a little village at his childhood.The size of the school is very small.It has few buildings and few teachers.But with these circumstances,Newton still became successful.As he grew up,he was sitting under an apple tree,an apple dropped on his head.Inspired,Newton discovered gravity,formulating a theory to explain many phenomena.It was a big step on the physics of his country,even the world.What can we learn from this example? the successful people never failed to contribute to a successful development of a country.But How much money the school has can’t determine people’s success, other factor such as intelligence and hard work can determine it.
Because you can see outcomes of the young children’s education only after serval decades,spending funds on young children’s education always be less inefficient than on universities.Spending money on universities can obtain many achievements more quickly than spending money on the young children’s education.Many innovation products was invented by universities.The innovation products always benefits to the society directly.Such as the electric car,which is environment-friendly and energy-saving that invented by the labs in the universities.Many countries reduced the amount of gas emission because many people began to use electric cars,which operated by the clean fuel.It also solved the problem of resource exhaustion.More importantly,universities needed more funds than the young children’s education.The labs in universities need money to do researches,upgrade the facilities and hire professors.The funds is enormous,so it need the government’s help.It's worth the Government to do.Because In contrast to the young children’education,pay money on the universities is really more efficient.
To sum up,with a close look,one can conclude that spending more money on young children’s education rather than universities is not the better choice,but the opposite is. |
|