issue4 感觉学术类的写起来没什么感觉，请大虾们指导！

shakerUID: 155873

issue4 "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."

With the explosion of knowledge, the interrelationship among disciplines looms so large that calls everyone’s attention. This practice is partly reflected by the fact that the definite boundaries among subjects are vanishing, and partly by the fact that more and more advances in specific field are promoted eternally. Thereafter some people believe, that any field of study can only developed via outsiders’ bringing knowledge and experience. As far as I concern, the inter-discipline is a trend in academic world and even punctuated in accordance with the pace of knowledge explosion.

The knowledge and experience from one discipline provide either a brand new explanation or an important supplement for old ones to another. We have a lot of examples to support this point. First is sociology and economics. Owning to the hundreds of years of development, economics theory undergoes logical models and quantitative approaches, which gives people an abstruse impression. Sociology, on the contrary, fixes its aim at solving problems that are familiar to us, despite lacks an adequate mathematical base. But via inter-discipline, the results could be different. Wise economists manage to explain social phenomenon in the aspect of economics, such as how to evaluate the effectiveness of government, and how to calculate opportunity cost of changing current job. Whereas wise sociologists derive statistical methods from economics to put social study even logical and sophisticated. Another persuasive example could be biochemistry. When two seemingly separated disciplines---biology and chemistry--met in response to anxiety of practical use, there a new discipline came into being.

Moreover, as the unique knowledge background outsiders possess, chances are that they are likely to posit breakthroughs in that field. Outsider, within the differentiation in ideas and without doctrinal confines, they are most prone to shed light on the studies of field, bring vibrancy when disciplines’ limitation is to meet. Many experts in specific field have learned other subjects. 2003 Nobel prize winner in economics, Engle, who have once studied physics, admitted that physics gives him subtle thought and clear logic so that to triumph in econometrics. Another is Sorotes. The early study of philosophy yields his provident inspiration in financial market, overwhelming whole nation’s economic system. These people are the beneficiaries of inter-disciplines.

Admittedly, inter-disciplines are by no means inevitability to enhance research significantly. There are two reasons for this. Firstly, the problem lies in its difficulty. It is quite impossible for an individual to have penetrating understanding in both disciplines, then even skillful enough to apply them properly. Secondly, it is an intrinsic one. Integration or implant expertise from other disciplines is not the only solution. Besides, the understanding in itself can be crucial, in other words, exerting morrow from discipline itself is also a key to summit

In sum, outsiders indeed bring a lot of discoveries, therefore being aware of its importance for academic world, not overlooking the importance of internal progress as well, may it thrive.

gdhdannyUID: 125843

Nowadays, many colleges and universities begin to advocate that the faculty should take a period （of time）to work out of the academic field in some professions relevant to the courses they teach in order to improving（improve） the quality of their instruction. In my point of view, I think it is a better way to advance the technique applied in the society and provide more available knowledge for their（their指谁？） students.

The colleges and the universities not only provide wide knowledge and professional technique to the students but also provide and invent（invent and provide逻辑顺序考虑下）advanced technique for the society. In other words, besides the task of teaching the students, the faculty has been assumed（这个词不合适，regarded） to address the problems emerged in society. This dual attribution of the colleges and universities determines the fact that their faculty should be required to know what problem the society need to solve. Thus, the faculty should often go out （of）their academic world to（and） work in the relevant field of their profession. Through their works, they may find something need to improve, and this experience would help them to make their research（首先做研究用make不太好，另外缺个宾语补足语） in laboratory and finally make out more efficient way or more effective way（改成make out a way that is more efficient and effective） to address the problem. Therefore, the society needs the faculty to work in relevant field of their profession and bring innovations to the society.

In addition, the experience gained in the work outside the academic world enable the faculty to have more efficient way（ways） to instruct their student. Because the faculty has learned what knowledge and technique had played a crucial role in practical（宾语从句用what做主语，不应该再出现a crucial role）, they could emphasize the important part of their courses to their students. On the other hand, the knowledge and technique develop so fast that lots of contents in the book should be superceded by the new ones. As（For） the students, they could not only acquire the newest and most important knowledge but also attain the great valuable practical experience from the course. That would help them to adapt their works more quickly after graduating from the school.（on the other hand论述的东西和faculty有什么关系？）

Nevertheless, this（the） recommendation that require faculty to spend time working in relevant field of their professions is not available to all the faculty in the college and university. Some fundamental subjects, such as the physics, mathematics, biology so on and so forth, which engage in studying the essential principles of the objective world, might be not（not be） necessary to have their faculty（might not necessarily require their faculty） to work outside the academic world. Because the research they（who?） are performing have no direct relationship with the society（不同意啊，怎么能没有关系呢？）. These faculty could not be able to find a right position to work unless（other than） in（in没用）their laboratory. The faculty need to work outside should be confined in the application subjects which have close relationship with the society, such as the application of mathematics（前面好像刚在列举中提到过数学，这里怎么又可以应用了？） which is widely applied in the financial system.

In summary, the faculty from the subjects which have more relationship with the society should be required to take a period（同样问题） to work in relevant field of their profession. Not only does the faculty provide more efficient and effective way for the society, （主语！）but also makes their course more available（这个词比较含糊） to the students.

总体来讲，结构比较清晰，但问题同样比较明显。
首先对于复杂句的应用头脑还要保持清醒，从句欠套的时候注意成分的缺失。
另外一点建议是适当加些事例会让文章显得更有说服力。建议多读读相关范文。