寄托天下
查看: 2771|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[问答] 请教一道Manhattan模考的SE,太绕了,看半天没看明白 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
60
寄托币
724
注册时间
2010-8-31
精华
0
帖子
114

US-applicant

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-11-17 14:09:12 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Despite pressure from right-leaning board members to__________ leftist propaganda evident in the current editorial biases, the city’s newspaper has maintained some sense of neutrality because a majority of the board understood the conservative caucus to have sham intent in trying to galvanize public opinion against the paper.

A.vacillate
B.prevent
C.sanction
D.inoculate in
E.wallow in
F.waver

答案是C.E

后面是majority知道少部分的人要trick people,然后他们要保持neutrality,但是跟前面那句话有什么关系吗。。。。我碰到这样的题目就绕不出来,麻烦看懂的同学帮忙解释一下
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
421
寄托币
3400
注册时间
2012-9-26
精华
1
帖子
538

Aries白羊座 GRE梦想之帆 寄托兑换店纪念章 US-applicant 荣誉版主

沙发
发表于 2013-11-19 01:43:54 |只看该作者
当时同纠结此题的飘过。。。
请参考:https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1628060-1-1.html

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
60
寄托币
724
注册时间
2010-8-31
精华
0
帖子
114

US-applicant

板凳
发表于 2013-11-19 16:08:05 |只看该作者
kelin212 发表于 2013-11-19 01:43
当时同纠结此题的飘过。。。
请参考:https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1628060-1-1.html

我才看到你的回帖,多谢啊!!!咱俩纠结的点一模一样啊!!!!

不过我还是不明白哪一点可以看出他们是要actuate the plan呢?阻止不行么?阻止这个计划也能激起大众不满吧?

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
22
寄托币
477
注册时间
2013-7-13
精华
0
帖子
121
地板
发表于 2013-11-19 17:04:43 |只看该作者
问一下选wallow是什么意思,这个单词和sanction意思完全不一样啊...

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
60
寄托币
724
注册时间
2010-8-31
精华
0
帖子
114

US-applicant

5
发表于 2013-11-19 18:12:30 |只看该作者
我也有这种感觉,答案说是sanction和wallow in 都有表同意的意思

在韦氏上查了下

wallow

1:  to roll oneself about in a lazy, relaxed, or ungainly manner <hogs wallowing in the mud>

2:  to billow forth :  surge

3:  to devote oneself entirely; especially :  to take unrestrained pleasure :  delight

4 a :  to become abundantly supplied :  luxuriate <a family that wallows in money>
   b :  to indulge oneself immoderately <wallowing in self-pity>

5:  to become or remain helpless <allowed them to wallow in their ignorance>

sanction

1:  a formal decree; especially :  an ecclesiastical decree

2:a obsolete :  a solemn agreement :  oath
b :  something that makes an oath binding

3:  the detriment, loss of reward, or coercive intervention annexed to a violation of a law as a means of enforcing the law

4a :  a consideration, principle, or influence (as of conscience) that impels to moral action or determines moral judgment
b :  a mechanism of social control for enforcing a society's standards
c :  explicit or official approval, permission, or ratification :  approbation

5:  an economic or military coercive measure adopted usually by several nations in concert for forcing a nation violating international law to desist or yield to adjudication

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
60
寄托币
724
注册时间
2010-8-31
精华
0
帖子
114

US-applicant

6
发表于 2013-11-19 18:17:02 |只看该作者
tkt111 发表于 2013-11-19 17:04
问一下选wallow是什么意思,这个单词和sanction意思完全不一样啊...

manhattan给的解释

This sentence is best understood from back to front. A majority of the board members know that the conservatives have “sham,” meaning “false, often having to do with a trick”, intent. Because the members understood that the conservative minority was trying to trick people, the majority was able to help the newspaper maintain “some sense of neutrality.” We can logically conclude that the conservatives were trying to cause the newspaper to be not neutral. Blocking “leftist propaganda” would drive the editorial biases to the center. Therefore, we must conclude that the conservative, or right-leaning, board members were supporting leftist propaganda. We are looking for a filler word such as “allow” or “support.”

(A) Vacillate means “to hesitate or waver in forming an opinion.” While this word fits thematically, it does not make sense in context.

(B) Prevent means “to stop.” This is the opposite of what we are looking for.

(C) CORRECT. Sanction means “to endorse.” This is a perfect fit.

(D) Inoculate against means “to prevent contraction, especially a disease.” While it would seem logical that right-leaning board members would want to inoculate against leftist propaganda, this is actually the opposite of their intent in the context of this sentence.

(E) CORRECT. To wallow literally means to “roll about lazily.” In this context, it has the more subtle meaning of “to devote oneself to, or to submerse oneself in.” This provides the meaning we are looking for.

(F) Waver means “to sway between two opinions.” While this word fits thematically, it does not make sense in context.

Note that (B) and (D) are near synonyms but provide the opposite meaning. Also, (A) and (F) are synonyms, but do not fit with the overall meaning of the sentence.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
60
寄托币
724
注册时间
2010-8-31
精华
0
帖子
114

US-applicant

7
发表于 2013-11-19 18:27:17 |只看该作者
Blocking “leftist propaganda” would drive the editorial biases to the center. Therefore, we must conclude that the conservative, or right-leaning, board members were supporting leftist propaganda. We are looking for a filler word such as “allow” or “support.”

为毛线啊!!我还是不懂这里是什么意思啊!!内牛!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
22
寄托币
477
注册时间
2013-7-13
精华
0
帖子
121
8
发表于 2013-11-19 20:03:12 |只看该作者
daidi1990 发表于 2013-11-19 18:27
Blocking “leftist propaganda” would drive the editorial biases to the center. Therefore, we must c ...

我的理解你参考一下 a majority of the board understood the conservative(right-learning) caucus to have sham intent(否定) in trying to galvanize public opinion against (否定)the paper(之前的 leftist propaganda).
负负得正,应该是支持,当然,真叫我做,这题我直接可以跳掉了...

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
60
寄托币
724
注册时间
2010-8-31
精华
0
帖子
114

US-applicant

9
发表于 2013-11-19 20:48:37 |只看该作者
tkt111 发表于 2013-11-19 20:03
我的理解你参考一下 a majority of the board understood the conservative(right-learning) caucus to ...

多谢,但我还是不明白。。。。。每到这种时候就会怀疑自己的智商。。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
421
寄托币
3400
注册时间
2012-9-26
精华
1
帖子
538

Aries白羊座 GRE梦想之帆 寄托兑换店纪念章 US-applicant 荣誉版主

10
发表于 2013-11-20 01:30:54 |只看该作者
daidi1990 发表于 2013-11-19 16:08
我才看到你的回帖,多谢啊!!!咱俩纠结的点一模一样啊!!!!

不过我还是不明白哪一点可以看出他们 ...

“We can logically conclude that the conservatives were trying to cause the newspaper to be not neutral. Blocking “leftist propaganda” would drive the editorial biases to the center. Therefore, we must conclude that the conservative, or right-leaning, board members were supporting leftist propaganda.”

句前一个despite说明前半句的动作应该和后面的maintained neutrality是相反的,也就是要让其not neutral,然后据Manhattan的解释来看bolcking leftist propaganda会使其neutral,所以相反的就是要supporting了。。。
我当时不明白的是right-leaning, leftist和the conservative三者到底是个什么关系,这可能和文化背景也有关系,LZ不必太纠结。。。
不过时隔3月,我填空几乎忘光了

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
60
寄托币
724
注册时间
2010-8-31
精华
0
帖子
114

US-applicant

11
发表于 2013-11-20 10:58:18 |只看该作者
kelin212 发表于 2013-11-20 01:30
“We can logically conclude that the conservatives were trying to cause the newspaper to be not ne ...

多谢版主回复~~我现在有些明白了,还不敢说完全理解

谢谢~!!!:loveliness:

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
50
寄托币
63
注册时间
2014-2-19
精华
0
帖子
12
12
发表于 2014-9-6 14:46:39 |只看该作者
一样纠结过,个人理解是:
右派就是保守派,右派有个虚伪的目的就是,放任左派的宣传,这样就可以刺激民众反对左派。

使用道具 举报

RE: 请教一道Manhattan模考的SE,太绕了,看半天没看明白 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
请教一道Manhattan模考的SE,太绕了,看半天没看明白
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1686327-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部