ISSUE82

linyutangUID: 156648

近期考，总是没有话说
Accustomed although we are speaking the attitude of the government towards art works and historical displays, as "free and objective", while the actual attitude, in the full sense of the world, has never been so simple. The author asserts that the government should never censor them that a museum wishes to exhibit. However, in my observation, although the claim is not completely without support, we should take a deeper insight that censor is necessary.

Admittedly, the artistic works know no boundaries and the historical display is the vested facts that can be concealed. If the government attaches too much censor and limitation on them, the society may survive but not thrive.  The culture revolution in China from 1967 to
1977 is just a example in point. This culture catastrophe brought about a tremendous loss to China's development of the critical inspiration and innovation. During those 10 years, the culture was in a state of stagnancy. No great came into being. The artists are just like eagles without wings in that they have ambitions but cannot fly in the sky freely. Their wings of imagination and creating are fettered and suppressed by the excessive control on the field. Sarcastically, the potentates at that time were proud of their censor.

However, it is the government's responsibility to assure the stability and the prosperity of the society. It is because when savoring the nectar of the free minds, we are bound to face the problems it leads to. If the contents of that the museum wants to show includes pornographic or violent ingredients, the government has the right and obligation to forbid its show.
Being exposed to a society fraught with violence or blue materials, the adolescents are likely to bump into malfeasance. They are apt to intimidate the behaviors in the films which they think are brave or exciting. Sexual problems prior to marriage, drug abusing, firing at the classmates are the consequential aftermath that the toxic "artist work" gives arise to.

In the final analysis, the key point is that to which extent should the government intervene the contents the museum favors. For example, how to judge what is a pornographic material is questionable. Whether the actors or actress wear clothes or nude is not in point as the matter of fact, because many famous oil paintings just depicts the people who are naked. In reality, it is what the works express matters. Meanwhile, with respect to the historical display, the bacterium is whether it distorts the s history which seems a fact while recorded by subjective people. For example, if the museum displays the medals promulgated by the emperor of Japan to the army during the Second World War, it is bound to be forbidden by the government and resisted by the Chinese people as well.

In a word, as the governor and the also the protector of the society, government should stand at a high level and deal with the things in a microscopic dimension. What we need is a powerful but not autocratic government, a democratic but a unrestrained government. Therefore, I assert in the full conviction that government should and must censor the artistic works or historical displays that a museum wishes to exhibit.

sniper613UID: 147372

No.1 ISSUE82 请拍，急
近期考，总是没有话说
Accustomed although we are speaking the attitude of the government towards art works and historical displays, as "free and objective", while the actual attitude, in the full sense of the world, has never been so simple. The author asserts that the government should never censor them that a museum wishes to exhibit. However, in my observation, although the claim is not completely without support, we should take a deeper insight that censor is necessary.

Admittedly, the artistic works know(动词不太好吧，换换吧) no boundaries and the historical display is the vested facts that can be concealed. If the government attaches too much censor and limitation on them, the society may survive but not thrive. The culture revolution （Culture Revolution）in China from 1967 to 1977 is just a example in point. This culture catastrophe brought about a tremendous loss to China's development of the critical inspiration and innovation. During those 10 years, the culture was in a state of stagnancy. No great came into being.(太绝对化了) The artists are just like eagles without wings in that they have ambitions but cannot fly in the sky freely. Their wings of imagination and creating are fettered and suppressed by the excessive control on the field. Sarcastically, the potentates at that time were proud of their censor.（尽管事实如此，但也应加以论证，不能乱发展Topic）

However, it is the government's responsibility to assure the stability and the prosperity of the society. It is because when savoring the nectar of the free minds,(good words) we are bound to face the problems it leads to. If the contents of that the museum wants to show includes pornographic or violent ingredients, the government has the right and obligation to forbid its show. Being exposed to a society fraught with violence or blue materials, the adolescents are likely to bump into malfeasance. They are apt to intimidate the behaviors in the films which they think are brave or exciting. Sexual problems prior to marriage, drug abusing, firing at the classmates are the consequential aftermath that the toxic "artist work" gives arise to.

In the final analysis, the key point is that to which extent should the government intervene the contents the museum favors. For example, how to judge what is a pornographic material is questionable. Whether the actors or actress wear clothes or nude is not in point as the matter of fact, because many famous oil paintings just depicts the people who are naked. In reality, it is what the works express matters. Meanwhile, with respect to the historical display, the bacterium(?) is whether it distorts the s history which seems a fact while recorded by subjective people. For example, if the museum displays the medals promulgated by the emperor of Japan to the army during the Second World War, it is bound to be forbidden by the government and resisted by the Chinese people as well.

In a word, as the governor and the also the protector of the society, government should stand at a high level and deal with the things in a microscopic dimension. What we need is a powerful but not autocratic government, a democratic but a unrestrained government. Therefore, I assert in the full conviction that government should and must censor the artistic works or historical displays that a museum wishes to exhibit.

写得很好，分析很透彻，论据也很充分