- 最后登录
- 2004-8-17
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 1394
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2003-11-17
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 123
- UID
- 149710

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1394
- 注册时间
- 2003-11-17
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Does conformity almost always lead to a dendening of individual creativity and energy? (开头照抄原题?不太好吧)The [U]speaker maintains so. [/U] (这个表达不太地道)As far as I am concerned, I fundamentally agree with the speaker’s statement that conformity always inhibits individual creativity and energy and disconformity usually stimulates individual creativity and energy.
Conformity [U]means obey [/U] (有人指出了) some general rules whether [U]it is right or not; [/U](单复) thus it makes individual become lazy and [U]do[/U] (去掉,make sb not do sth.)not want to think or do something new. The standard test in Chinese education system is a case in point. Such standard tests always have only one system of [U]correct [/U] (既然correct还有什么不好?要强调是fixed)answers and usually inhibit the creativity of students. For example, in literature subject, when the [U]test asks [/U] (这个搭配我觉得有点问题) the examinees the connotation of a [U]sentence said [/U] (sentence似乎不大用said, put up with?) by some famous people, there is only one [U]correct [/U] (同样,建议去掉) answer regardless of how meaningful this sentence is. As a long run, the students tend to think something with a fixed method and dare not to think something new. One scholar had made an experiment to test creativity of students. He first drew a circle on the blackboard, and then asked the students what it is like. From fundamental students, he receive hundreds of answers such as the Sun, plate, wheel and so on, while from college students, he only received one answer, a circle. This experiment shows that the creativity of our students have been greatly weakened by standard education system.感觉漏了一步,能有各种回答就是创新性的体现吗?
On the other hand, disconformity stimulates individual creativity and energy, because it allows individuals to think freely and independently; hence individuals will more easily to pursue something new and devote their energy to their thoughts. Many great discoveries illustrate this point. For instance, before Mendel began his research in genetics, many people had already done lots of work in genetics. The common way of research at that time was doing experiments first and then finding theories or assumptions to explain the experiments. Mendel, however, did not comfort this rule and he took an opposite method: he first [U]thought [/U] (又来了,think用的太多,先不论是否恰当,首先这个词不够正式) an assumption about genetics and then he did experiments to verify his assumption. Due to the disconformity and the talents of Mendel, he finally found the Mendel's law in genetics and was regarded as [U]genetics father [/U] (father of genetics) by following people. If Mendel had conformed the general method at his time, he would probably fail just as his contemporary researchers. It is obvious that disconformity encourages his creativity.
Admittedly, in some teamwork, it is necessary for most team members to conform to a base (为了强调一致性,用个shared 之类的是否好点,为了和主题对应么)object. Without a common object shared by all the members, the goal of the team will hardly be achieved. But the methods to reach this goal should not be limited, otherwise the members' creativity will be inhibited.
All in all, in most cases, conformity inhibits individual creativity and energy, and disconformity stimulates individual creativity. Therefore, our society and education should be more tolerant to (of?)those people or students who disobey the general rule as long as they do not break the basic moral standard and law.
首先,和conformity对应的该是不是 individuality? 那个disconformity看的我感觉别扭的要死。另外conformity就是obey general rule这个说法有点绝对,值得商榷。
感觉论证上比较充分,老兄,有一点我就不客气了,语言上你的进步不大啊。 |
|