寄托天下
查看: 3707|回复: 14

[优秀习作] issue225 寻找相似点 写的好郁闷. [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
950
注册时间
2003-3-6
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2004-3-21 08:24:46 |显示全部楼层
:D 225. "People often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms; we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else."

Everything and everyone in this world is unique. Everything has its own characteristic. Therefore, some people maintain that we should consider thing in its own way. Also, comparison might be useless or even deleterious. In my opinion, however, although everything is unique and comparison sometimes has ill effect, looking for similarities between things is how we understand our world, as well as communicate with one another. We should not avoid useful comparison.

Similarities among things are useful for our understanding the world because this enables us to develop connections between different things and thus making clear classification and logical inference. Without doing so the world in our minds remains chaotic, and we will not be able to form science since scientific inquiry is essentially a process of finding common laws from different events. For example, in order to study creature, human beings roughly classify all living things in the nature into two categories: animals and plants. By classification, scientists can reveal similarities, differences and mutual relationship among creatures. On the contrary, analyzing everything according to its own character, in other words, considering things as separate has its weakness for two reasons. First, such approach denies the relationship between different things. Secondly, such method offers us no common laws. As we can see, there are innumerable things in the world. Although they have their own characters, behind seemingly difference, there are universal laws that can explain their characters and govern their motion, which require us to find out similarities. Analyzing things in their own way is unable to achieve this goal. Fortunately, Our similarities- seeking nature enables us to better perceive the world around us.

Also, to establish a reciprocal relationship between individuals, groups and nations calls for looking for similarities.As an old proverb goes, birds with the same feathers gathered.People like to communicate with others who share the same character, cultural background, interests, belief and so on. Consider bob and john, whose characters are totally different. One is talkative and the other is so reticent. It is hard to imagine those two people can keep good interpersonal relationship. By the same token, groups and nations also seek after the common aspects. Especially in modern global village, pursuing similarities between nations is conducive to world peace and development. Take America and China for example. In the recent decades, America and China have far less disputes than ever; instead in many fields they develop a series of cooperation. As a consequence, both two countries gain huge interests from cooperation. The results come precisely from their economically common interests regardless of different political regimes and ideology.

Admittedly, too much comparison between different events can be misleading and detrimental sometimes. In zeal to find similarities, sometimes we might neglect the essential clues that indicate the real difference; this will stray us to make wrong conclusions. When we are comparing two things, we are likely to assume that the other variables of the events tend to be the same. One example is Maginot line马奇诺防线.During the 1930’s, France mistakenly assumed that World War II would be like World War I and thus built an elaborate fortification line along its northern border to prevent German invasion. Surprisingly, Germans with their new technology simply swept around the line. This case tells us that pursuing ostensible similarities while ignoring the real difference leads to failure and disaster.


To sum up, no doubt our ability to seek similarities have help us to find truth, but we must be careful in our making comparison because wrong comparison can have disastrous effects. It is best to keep referring to something relevant, instead of evaluating a thing on its own terms. (531words)
莫听穿林打叶声,
何妨吟啸且徐行,
竹杖芒鞋轻胜马。
谁怕!
一蓑烟雨任平生。


料峭春风吹酒醒,
微冷。
山头斜照却相迎。
回首向来萧瑟处,
归去,
也无风雨也无晴。

使用道具 举报

声望
1
寄托币
1531
注册时间
2003-10-12
精华
1
帖子
8
发表于 2004-3-21 08:38:14 |显示全部楼层

先发我以前写的看看 等会帮你该马上就好

提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
签名被屏蔽

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
950
注册时间
2003-3-6
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2004-3-21 08:54:19 |显示全部楼层
好的,谢谢.我也在改你的,一会好
莫听穿林打叶声,
何妨吟啸且徐行,
竹杖芒鞋轻胜马。
谁怕!
一蓑烟雨任平生。


料峭春风吹酒醒,
微冷。
山头斜照却相迎。
回首向来萧瑟处,
归去,
也无风雨也无晴。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
950
注册时间
2003-3-6
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2004-3-21 09:15:01 |显示全部楼层
Is it necessary to search for similarities between things? The speaker asserts that we should avoid the tendency to do so. As far as I am concerned, I concede thatthere is no need to look for similarities between very different things, and even it is not only helpful but also harmful to do so, not only...but also  用于递进关系你这个是对立的however, there are some merits in making comparisons and finding the similarities.我觉得你是说比较有用,但你前句concede 说不需要有点矛盾应该说尽管有时有害看完了以后我觉得你的开头应该改,通篇文章强调similarities 的危害,你应该是基本赞成观点

As a famous philosopher says, “There are no two leaves entirely same in the world.” Everything sprouts, grows, prospers, and wanes until it disappears, the whole process of its growth accords to its own special character into consideration. 引用语不错Speaking in terms of economics,  every country should take its own history and economical condition. 这句要改一下One needs look no further than the economic revolutionary process of China after Liberation to see how important it is to emphasize a country’s own base situation. After liberation from old China, we first built a brothers-sister relationship with Soviet Union and want to copy its policy in order to be strong. Then according to the planned economy, we distribute everything equally like rice, steel and all kinds of things including jobs, as a result our economics didn’t prosper but stagnated. It turned out that blindly follow or copy another country’s policy is a total failure. Not until Chairman Deng Xiaoping Proposed the Market Economy, which caused great competitions and brought in oversea estate, 直接说实行了Open Policy根据自己的国情did China experience a rise in Economy and our social prosperity.

Speaking in terms of society, 有这种说法吗looking for the similarity causes some harmful effects, such as the racial and sexual discrimination and ethical confliction, religious confliction. Hence, to call for equality raises the Blacks Movements, Women’s Movement, the war between Pakistan and Israel, even the recent 911event caused by terrorism.很不错的说


Speaking in terms of Education, in the field of educationChina’s test-system, which calls for a specific accordablestandard answer to a question, inhibits the creativity of students and the variety of our logical and reasoning ability. We can easily find that lots of people blindly follow the knowledge heritage of our ancestors’. Without critically new or different ideawe can’t cannot 不要简写survive, let alone prosper, either is a country.也不错

Admittedly, we encourage people with critical thinking to search for something different rather than similar since the habit of searching for similarity may cause so many disadvantages in economy, society and education, on the other hand , in some aspects, it’s valuable to compare something similar to get a better understanding of another new thing. As a teacher in kindergarten when introducing the concept of white to our kids, I usually refer to the white clouds and sheep, to compare the similarity between them, and then kids can get a concrete understanding of the conceptual term “white”.不错

As I illustrates above, we should strike a balance between critical thinking and searching for similarity to develop and prosper our country, to enrich, colorize and authorize our knowledge, and to stimulate our economy to take off. Accordingly, on balance the speaker is fundamentally correct.

总而言之,这片文章不错,就是开头要改.虽然我的观点与你相反,但是我觉得你的思路比我开阔.以后希望经常互改, btw,你什么时候考?
还有你以后可以给我一个链接,这样我就可以看到你的文章了.不需要全文粘贴.
莫听穿林打叶声,
何妨吟啸且徐行,
竹杖芒鞋轻胜马。
谁怕!
一蓑烟雨任平生。


料峭春风吹酒醒,
微冷。
山头斜照却相迎。
回首向来萧瑟处,
归去,
也无风雨也无晴。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
950
注册时间
2003-3-6
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2004-3-21 09:16:33 |显示全部楼层
呵呵不要误会了,我的文章还没人改,上面的是我给别人改的,不要错过了我的文章哦.
莫听穿林打叶声,
何妨吟啸且徐行,
竹杖芒鞋轻胜马。
谁怕!
一蓑烟雨任平生。


料峭春风吹酒醒,
微冷。
山头斜照却相迎。
回首向来萧瑟处,
归去,
也无风雨也无晴。

使用道具 举报

声望
1
寄托币
1531
注册时间
2003-10-12
精华
1
帖子
8
发表于 2004-3-21 09:20:22 |显示全部楼层

哎,看完你的文章我的就相形见拙了~`

提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
签名被屏蔽

使用道具 举报

声望
1
寄托币
1531
注册时间
2003-10-12
精华
1
帖子
8
发表于 2004-3-21 09:34:45 |显示全部楼层

谢谢先~~~~~~~`

提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
签名被屏蔽

使用道具 举报

声望
1
寄托币
1531
注册时间
2003-10-12
精华
1
帖子
8
发表于 2004-3-21 09:48:15 |显示全部楼层
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
签名被屏蔽

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1
寄托币
8169
注册时间
2003-12-21
精华
0
帖子
12

荣誉版主

发表于 2004-3-21 11:34:39 |显示全部楼层

my comment

225. "People often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms; we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else."

Everything and everyone in this world is unique. Everything has its own characteristic. Therefore, some people maintain that we should consider thing in its own way. Also, comparison might be useless or even deleterious. In my opinion, however, although everything is unique and comparison sometimes has ill effect, looking for similarities between things is how we understand our world, as well as communicate with one another. We should not avoid useful comparison.explicit beginning

Similarities among things are useful for our understanding the world for两个for,考虑换成because this enable us to develop connections between different things and thus makingmake clear classification and logical inference. Without doing so the world in our minds remain chaotic, and we will not be able to form science since scientific inquiry is essentially a process of finding common laws from different events. For example, in order to study creature, human beings roughly classify all living things in the nature into two cataloguescategories: animals and plants. By classification, scientists can reveal similarities, differences and mutual relationship among creatures. On the contrary, analyzing everything according to its own character, in other words, considering things as separate觉得separately好些 has its weakness for two reasons. First, such approach denies the relationship between different things. Secondly, such method is time-consumingwhy?. Fortunately, Our similarities- seeking nature enables us to best perceive the world around us.

Also, to establish a reciprocal relationship between individuals, groups and nations calls for looking for similarities.俗话说人以类聚,物以群分People like to communicate with others who share the same character, cultural background, interests, belief and so on. Consider bob and john, whose characters are totally different. One is talkative and the other is so reticent. It is hard to imagine those two people can keep good interpersonal relationship. By the same token, groups and nations also seek after the common aspects. Especially in modern global village, pursuing similarities between nations is conducive to world peace and development. Take American and China for example. In the recent decades, American and China no longer hate?用这个hate欠妥,不如have far less disputes than ever each other; instead in many fields they develop a series of cooperation. As a consequence, both two countries gain huge interests from cooperation. The results come precisely from their economically common interests regardless of different political regimes and ideology. good point and excellent analysis

Admittedly, too much comparison between different events can be misleading and detrimental sometimes. In zeal to find similarities, sometimes we might neglect the essential clues that indicate the real difference; this will stray us to make wrong conclusions. When we are comparing two things, we are assuming that the other variables of the events are the same.这句话欠妥,how about: we are likely to assume that the other variables of the events tend to be the same,这样不会太绝对化 One example is Maginot line马奇诺防线.During the 1930’s, France mistakenly assumed that World War II would be like World War I and thus built an elaborate fortification line along its northern border to prevent German invasion. Surprisingly, Germans with their new technology simply swept around the line. This case tells us that pursuing ostensible similarities while ignoring the real difference leads to failure and disaster.


To sum up, no doubt our ability to seek similarities have help us to find truth, but itwe must be careful in our making comparison because wrong comparison can have disastrous effects. It is best to keep referring to something else what else? Make it clear instead of evaluating a thing on its own terms. 如果时间够的化可以多照应一下开头,毕竟开头说了不少,也有几层意思,结尾单薄了些(531words)
第2个BODY 写的相当不错,象你学习!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
950
注册时间
2003-3-6
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2004-3-23 00:51:57 |显示全部楼层
To kisssummer:
不好意思,这俩天没上网.回答你的问题先:-)
1 你可以先搜索你自己的文章,然后再复制地址栏里文章的链接就可以了.
2你的 speaking in terms of ...中文意味太强,是 chingish.最好用地道的英文习语,不然老外看不懂.
3关于改文章的变色问题,你可以在这个版下载clorize的变色工具.
4谢谢你给我那个谚语的答案,我找了好久.
5我也快考了,一起进步.
莫听穿林打叶声,
何妨吟啸且徐行,
竹杖芒鞋轻胜马。
谁怕!
一蓑烟雨任平生。


料峭春风吹酒醒,
微冷。
山头斜照却相迎。
回首向来萧瑟处,
归去,
也无风雨也无晴。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
950
注册时间
2003-3-6
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2004-3-23 01:04:57 |显示全部楼层
To syd:
你的评论很中肯,很多地方我都同意.
我想请问的是第一个body有什么不足之处,第三个body的例子是否恰当?还有我的整体水平如何,应该朝什么方向努力?
considering things as separate觉得separately好些,我认为consider sth as 应该接形容词.
莫听穿林打叶声,
何妨吟啸且徐行,
竹杖芒鞋轻胜马。
谁怕!
一蓑烟雨任平生。


料峭春风吹酒醒,
微冷。
山头斜照却相迎。
回首向来萧瑟处,
归去,
也无风雨也无晴。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
950
注册时间
2003-3-6
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2004-3-23 01:19:35 |显示全部楼层
To kisssummer;
1By the same token是同样地,similarly,in the same way
2马奇诺防线是这么写的.
3seek after=seek for
4different events是不是用creatures好点啊)我意思是从不同的事物中寻找共同的规律.不能用creatures
5for our understanding(for us to understand)我认为这俩个表达方式都对.我比较喜欢前者这种动名词的方式,比较随意.
6help 后接动词原形,to省略.
我每次看修改后的作文都比较有收获,因为每个人都有自己的看法和思路.我的方法是讨论再讨论,有意见的地方提出来,觉得对的意见自己吸收.
莫听穿林打叶声,
何妨吟啸且徐行,
竹杖芒鞋轻胜马。
谁怕!
一蓑烟雨任平生。


料峭春风吹酒醒,
微冷。
山头斜照却相迎。
回首向来萧瑟处,
归去,
也无风雨也无晴。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1
寄托币
8169
注册时间
2003-12-21
精华
0
帖子
12

荣誉版主

发表于 2004-3-23 10:52:25 |显示全部楼层
To syd:
你的评论很中肯,很多地方我都同意.
我想请问的是第一个body有什么不足之处,第三个body的例子是否恰当?还有我的整体水平如何,应该朝什么方向努力?
considering things as separate觉得separately好些,我认为consider sth as 应该接形容词.


I am not sure about the usage of consider sth as at this point, allow me to check or ask someone who may know this.
第一个body感觉论证的有些散,段落中间牵涉的概念较多,冲淡了主体,不过这个没有办法,因为它们是互相联系得,你这样写已经是最好的办法了,否则只有另起论点了。

第三个BODY得例子有这个问题:
France mistakenly assumed that World War II would be like World War I and thus built an elaborate fortification line along its northern border to prevent German invasion.

but why would it be necessary for France to build an elaborate fortification in World War I? you begged the question as it is self-evident.

The last suggestion is to pay enough attention on the time issue that you will have far less time to ponder which example best support the topic of each para, and it is necessary for you to practise with time-limit. :)

Your wholistic level is fairly good and you should be confident that you are among the best. Lets prove ETS to be naive together. :cool:

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
950
注册时间
2003-3-6
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2004-3-23 13:16:55 |显示全部楼层
你的意见确实很有用.谢谢你的鼓励还有建议.
我想我不能再精调细凿了,能够顺利的写完就不错了.
希望以后一样能多多指教.
莫听穿林打叶声,
何妨吟啸且徐行,
竹杖芒鞋轻胜马。
谁怕!
一蓑烟雨任平生。


料峭春风吹酒醒,
微冷。
山头斜照却相迎。
回首向来萧瑟处,
归去,
也无风雨也无晴。

使用道具 举报

声望
1
寄托币
1531
注册时间
2003-10-12
精华
1
帖子
8
发表于 2004-3-23 13:30:09 |显示全部楼层
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
签名被屏蔽

使用道具 举报

RE: issue225 寻找相似点 写的好郁闷. [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue225 寻找相似点 写的好郁闷.
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-175620-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部