Issue159 人类与机器

sydUID: 151948

Issue159"The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds."


With the technology advancements today, especially in the field of Human Intelligence, there is a growing concern about the issue that whether machines will supersede human mind. The speaker contends that the winner of the battle between machine and its creator will always be the latter. I fundamentally agree with the speaker, however, because no one can precisely predict the future of technology, it is still possible for the machines to be superior to human mind in some fields, which could be proved only in the long term.

To begin with, being its creator, human mind is in control of the machines at most circumstances. Now we have automatic washing machines available, which require little human labor to wash the clothes than before. This kind of washing machine can even make fussy judgment on how much water should be used when washing certain amount of clothes, which can be more precise than many housewives. However, the fact we cannot ignore that this judgment of water use is actually not made by the machines, but by the programs input into the machine, which is developed by the programmer. This reveals that it is not the machines that can make decisions but the human minds that are input to it. In other words, it is human mind that controls the machines.

However, another problem arises when we look deeper into this issue. The advantage that machines have over human mind is that machines hardly have a limit compared with human. One need look no further than the famous example of the chess game between the super computer DEEP BLUE and the world champion Kaspalov. It is clear that what makes DEEP BLUE the winner of the game is its speed and computing complexity that are exponentially superior to the world champion. The human mind has certain limit on the speed and complexity while machines seldom have. Another case in point can be found in the processing-chip industry. When Intel, the leading chip manufacturing company developed Pentium III, some scientist claim that it is already reach the limit of the speed of processors based on silicon materials, but at present we have Pentium IV which are even faster and more steady than the previous one. The above analysis aptly illustrates that the advantage of machines over human mind are obvious and seems to be unlimited.

In the final analysis, shall we arrive at the conclusion that machines will surpass human mind and control us humans as in the scientific fictions? My answer is definitely negative. No matter how advanced modern technology maybe, it is always the tool for human beings to better serve themselves. Although the speed and computing complexity of human mind are not as fast as the super computers, being the creator, human mind can always develop superior ones to supersede current ones by numerous talented scientists who represent the acme of human intellect. Furthermore, it is impossible for the machines to be creative, because they can never think themselves rather than following the procedure of the programs input when they are made. Consequently, machines can never evolve themselves as human beings. In the two perspective discussed above, machines cannot change their status as servants to human forever and ever.

To conclude, although machines have some advantages over human mind, it is not superior to human mind. Human beings will always be the creator of machines, no matter how advanced they may be. Being unable to be creative, machines cannot evolve themselves and their status as servants will remain unchanged at now and in the future.
596words 42mins pp3

顺便问一下，卡斯帕罗夫到底怎么说，偶是蒙得。 :rolleyes:

PasterUID: 158653

觉得 开头段最后的观点在后文中似乎没什么牵扯到“in the long term”
总体感觉还好
加油！！！

sydUID: 151948

同意，是没有很好的照应到这一点。
不过我还是提了一下，以后在速度和计算复杂度上，机器是优于人类的，但是并不代表会超越人类，因为这些进步是人类创造和控制的。

papajohnsUID: 127722

With the technology advancements today,with the rapid development of technology especially in the field of Human Intelligence, there is a growing concern about the issue that whether machines will supersede human mind. The speaker contends that the winner of the battle between machine and its creator will always be the latter. I fundamentally agree with the speaker, however, because no one can precisely predict the future of technology, it is still possible for the machines to be superior to human mind in some fields, which could be proved only in the long term.你既然fundamentally agree，Why" however"?

To begin with, being its creator, human mind is in control of the machines at most circumstances. Now we have automatic washing machines available, which require littleless human labor to wash the clothes than before. This kind of washing machine can even make fussy judgment on how much water should be used when washing certain amount of clothes, which can be more precise than many housewives. However, the fact we cannot ignore that this judgment of water use is actually not made by the machines, but by the programs input into the machine, which is developed by the programmer. This reveals that it is not the machines that can make decisions but the human minds that are input to it. In other words, it is human mind that controls the machines.分析得很深入

However, another problem arises/occurs when we look deeper into this issue. The advantage that machines have over human mind is that machines hardly have a limit compared with human. One need look no further than the famous example of the chess game between the super computer DEEP BLUE and the world champion Kaspalov. It is clear that what makes DEEP BLUE the winner of the game is its speed and computing complexity that are (exponentially )this word is excellentsuperior to the world champion. The human mind has certain limit on the speed and complexity while machines seldom have. Another case in point can be found in the processing-chip industry. When Intel, the leading chip manufacturing company developed Pentium III, some scientist claim that it is already reach the limit of the speed of processors based on silicon materials, but at present we have Pentium IV which are even faster and more steady than the previous one. The above analysis aptly illustrates that the advantage of machines over human mind are obvious and seems to be unlimited. 我觉得有点想不通，第一个body说machine 比human强由于程序的原因，这段deep blue赢也是因为程序。为什么反而成为machine强的例证拉，除了这点整段无论语言还是逻辑非常不错

In the final analysis, shall we arrive at the conclusion that machines will surpass human mind and control us humans as in the scientific fictions? My answer is definitely negative.用no就可以拉 No matter how advanced modern technology maybe, it is always the tool for human beings to better serve themselves. Although the speed and computing complexity of human mind are not as fast as the super computers, being the creator, human mind can always develop superior ones to supersede current ones by numerous talented scientists who represent the acme of human intellect. Furthermore, it is impossible for the machines to be creative, because they can never think themselves rather than following the procedure of the programs input when they are made. Consequently, machines can never evolve themselves as human beings. In the two perspective discussed above, machines cannot change their status as servants to human forever and ever.

To conclude, although machines have some advantages over human mind, it is not superior to human mind. Human beings will always be the creator of machines, no matter how advanced they may be. Being unable to be creative, machines cannot evolve themselves and their status as servants will remain unchanged at now and in the future.
596words 42mins pp3

总之全文语言很好，几乎没语发错误，逻辑也很清晰，鉴于42min 完成真是不错。我的想法是1：承认machine确实比人强，例子很多2但是machine is but the creation of human minds, 人们想如何控制都行。（machine 会不会失控象科幻里面描写的那样？~~弱弱的问题~~）3human 强与machine的在于A： creative ability B:emotion

sydUID: 151948

I fundamentally agree with the speaker, however, because no one can precisely predict the future of technology, it is still possible for the machines to be superior to human mind in some fields, which could be proved only in the long term.你既然fundamentally agree，Why" however"?

maybe I should put it like this:
although at present and in the long term, in some fields it is possible for the machines to be superior to human mind, I foundamentally I agree with the speaker that human mind's winner status will be maintained for now and ever.

我觉得有点想不通，第一个body说machine 比human强由于程序的原因，这段deep blue赢也是因为程序。为什么反而成为machine强的例证拉，除了这点整段无论语言还是逻辑非常不错

是有这个问题，我应该把一二段的顺序调换一下，这样就是第一段说机器在某些方面强于人类，第二，三段说人类是机器的创造和控制者，所以不会被机器取代。就象你说的：

我的想法是1：承认machine确实比人强，例子很多2但是machine is but the creation of human minds, 人们想如何控制都行。3human 强与machine的在于A： creative ability B:emotion

（machine 会不会失控象科幻里面描写的那样？~~弱弱的问题~~）

这个问题我认为，人类是不会被取代的，因为最后的控制权始终在于人类