- 最后登录
- 2004-8-19
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 146
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2003-6-19
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 42
- UID
- 137645

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 146
- 注册时间
- 2003-6-19
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
(还是觉得这里加上In this argument, the arguer recommends比较好, 不然总觉得好像是自己的观点一样)Newsbeat should decrease their emphasis on international news and refrain from displaying such stories on their magazine covers in the arguer's point of view. However, the evidence provided are not persuasive to support the conclusion for several fallacies.
To begin with, the arguer unfairly assumes that the featured international new stories on the front covers should be responsible for the poor sale of their poorest-selling magazine(poor sale和poorest-selling是否有点重复?). However, no evidence shows that it is the case. It is highly possible that other factors might lead to the poor sale rather than the international new stories on the front covers(lead to可以这样用吗?我好像没见过,但觉得不顺). For instance, the contents of the magazine are out of date or out of people’s taste. Also, it is probable that serious problems of issuance exist, which bring to people much inconvenience to buy the magazines. without ruling out all these possible factors that might have impact on the poor sale of the magazine, the arguer’s assumption is quite ungrounded.
In addition, the arguer unwarrantedly assumes that it is the decreasing interest of people in international news leads to competing news-magazines to decrease the number of cover stories that they devote to international news. However, the arguer does not provide any information about the competing news-magazines, it is highly possible that other factors may have contribute to the measures that the competing magazines did. For example, those competing news magazines can not afford the cost in covering international news which might cost a large amount of money, or because they don’t have the strength to maintain their readers in contrast with us .In this manner, it will probably be a good opportunity for Newsbeat to take over a larger market in international news field..
Last but not least, while we are informed that the cost of maintaining their foreign bureaus to report on international news is increasing , however, it is not a suitable pretense to decrease their emphasis on international news. No evidence shows that the increasing trend will sustain and our company cannot afford such increase on cost. Largely possible (is)that, the Newsbeat has great economic strength , even if the increase will continue, it will not be a problem to afford it. What is more, the strategy that (that好像多余吧?)to decrease emphasis on international news would be an unwise action for the company , since the magazine is just famous for its international news, therefore, to decrease the focus on international news is quite risky to the magazine’s future.
To sum up, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. To make it more convincing, more information about Newsbeat and its competing news magazines are badly needed. Furthermore, evidence about decreased interest of people in international news should be provided.
所提均为个人观点,仅供参考
写的很不错,比我强多了,呵呵,我都还不敢来这里呢 |
|