在OG和Practice book上的范文里面,instruction为:Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.都有突出在什么情况下会not be advantageous,但是本楼里的提纲里,很多时候都是在advantageous上展开3个点,不知道这样是不是有影响呢?
比如下面这个Issue
Issue 11
People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
总论点:参半
分论点1: 诚然,人们的行为很大程度被外力决定(因为心智没被成熟,成年之前的很多事情是家长决定,操控的)
分论点2:但是,我认为,人们的行为是自己决定的(考GRE,选择深造,是自己自愿报名参加的,else一些例子?)
分论点3:一个人的行为不应该被割裂[二分法]来看,是外力和自己决定的影响的总和(比如报志愿虽然家长影响.但是最终是自己经过衡量的选择.比如GRE和TOEFL,虽然是自己自愿的参加,但是也是父母要求/提议or身边同学的影响的一种结果)