近期流传的500题的填空题 跪求大神来解答！！！！

Mr.DarrenUID: 3588655

1. Scientific papers often (i)________ what actually happened in the course of the investigations they describe,  Misunderstandings, blind alleys, and mistakes of various sorts of will fail to appear in the find written accounts, because (ii)________ is a desirable attribute when transmitting results in a scientific report and would be poorly served by (iii)________.
Blank (i)
A. amplify
B. misrepresent
C. particularize

Blank (ii)
D. transparency
E. efficiency
F. exhaustiveness

Blank (iii)
G. a comprehensive historical account
H. a purely quantitative analysis
I. overly superficial discussion

为什么第三空填G，而不是I  
第三空因为填入负面的词汇，是因为overly 语气太强烈么？


2.  Due to the extraordinary circumstances, British business owners found themselves in a (i)________position during the second world war, forced to accept regular interference from government and to acquiescence to (ii)________ role for labor unions in negotiating the terms and conditions of employment.
Blank (i)
A. defensive
B. dominant
C. customary

Blank (ii)
D. a traditional
E. an enhanced
F. a diminished

为什么第二空是E？
我选择F ： 因为受到了interference,，所以role 就降低，减少
选E 是因为business owner 与 labor unions 是对立的么？ Unions 的role 提高，owner就是降低？

sophy630UID: 3536080

哪里可以下载500题呢？

siuhonUID: 3613947

第一題看不懂
只填了i

第2條我的思路是這樣的
i) not B because they were forced by the govt, not C because they were forced by govt to do sth
ii)  acquiescence =  Brit in accord with (or help) the labor, not F
   i cant see anything pointing to 'tradition' or any change, not D
可以討論一下

无敌浩克OneUID: 3605802

我自己做时第一题是做对的，结果看到你的问题居然不会做了。。。建议以后把答案单独写出来而不是用表黑的方式，这样会比较影响思路啊T_T

文中说一些错误之类的不会体现出来，所以说明，这不是“完整”的体现，和分析或者数理，都是木有关系的~

hxb1014UID: 3656704

个人理解啊
有效性就是你的文章里关于你的成果的信息密度要足够大，而后面“全面的历史陈述”就会掺杂一堆与成果本身[就不是成果的背景啊来源啊这些]无关的东西。。。至于I.“肤浅的讨论”应该是文章的深浅问题，这里谈的重点应该是  简明扼要 与 大而全面 的对立

第二个的话，楼主是不是跟我第一次做这题目的时候一样把题读错了。。。企业家们只能不情愿地承认劳工联合会的势力壮大起来，这样他们的地位就是defensive的

大家看看这么解能说得通么

本人也是只能顺着答案这么反推思路了。。。另外的题就真的有不能理解的了

狐狸大叔UID: 2342950

it will be poorly served by...

==

it will NOT be served by..

efficiency..will NOT be served by a comprehensive historical account

why? because comprehensive and efficiency are not compatible!

狐狸大叔UID: 2342950

the second question is very similar with the first one, so I don't bother to explain

狐狸大叔UID: 2342950

hxb1014 发表于 2016-1-23 17:00
个人理解啊
有效性就是你的文章里关于你的成果的信息密度要足够大，而后面“全面的历史陈述”就会掺杂一堆 ...

which one confuses you?

give me the hardest question you've seen.

hxb1014UID: 3656704

狐狸大叔 发表于 2016-1-23 23:58
which one confuses you?

give me the hardest question you've seen.

Thanks for your explanation.

Here is the question which has confused me:

In Japanese aesthetics, especially but not only in Noh, beauty contains the idea of _____: beauty must have an air of evanescence, the intimation of its own demise.

A. transience  B. symmetry  C. decay  D. simplicity  E. balance F. deterioration

As far as I'm concerned, the BLANK is elaborated by the word "evanescence", which is "not last long". Surprisingly, the key to this BLANK is CF. But "decay" implies that the process lasts for a long time. It seems that the only reason to choose these choices is that they are synonyms, but none of the choices, from my point of view, is compatible with the whole sentence. Could you please give a better explanation to this question? I'd be appreciated.

狐狸大叔UID: 2342950

hxb1014 发表于 2016-1-24 17:54
Thanks for your explanation.

Here is the question which has confused me:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evanesce
The defintion in M-W is "to dissipate like vapor"

To dissipate like vapor implies that it's going to disappear very soon. Decay and deterioration match the definition of evanescence.

狐狸大叔UID: 2342950

hxb1014 发表于 2016-1-24 17:54
Thanks for your explanation.

Here is the question which has confused me:

You really have to stick with M-W definition.

short-lasting doesn't imply what the current state and the next state are. short-lasting pain is also short-lasting.

evanescence implies that it will dissipate, to disappear,etc. So you know the next state is to dissipate.