issue55 追求高分and教育质量，imong可以帮看下吗？

我要飞UID: 171394

issue55"Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education."  追求高分严重的限制了教育各阶段的学习质量。

Ever since students go to school, whatever fundamental school, middle-school or high-school, even after harsh competition they finally go to the ivory towers, there is always one thing bound with them--grades. Some students like grades, while others hate them. Contemporary educationalists and educationists are arguing whether the competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.  In my opinion, the lasting existence of the grade system itself proves its justification to some extend, yet, overzealous pursuit to the grades, of course, deviates the destination of educational system.

In the realm of education, grade system, weather in the form of percentage in China or in the form of A, B, C, D four levers in America, has been a standard to classify students into several groups: the excellent, the good, the pass and the failed. As far as I am concerned, the grade system meets the need of educational system at least in two aspects.

First and fundamentally, grade can reflect the effectiveness of education in all level. Common thing tell us it is useless to do anything without a standard. Though the  feedback of grades echoed from students, the teachers can know which course are better mastered and which course are weakly learned, which of the students are needed to be further informed, so as to improve their teaching and help those failed or unlearned. Till now, since there is no other more well-chosen and well-grounded system comes into being, the extant grade system as a standard should be still put into use. In fact, grade now is often served as an effective litmus test to test the effects of both teaching and learning which definitely play an active role in education.

Second, grade system can ignite an atmosphere of competition and compel the students to fight for a higher education. All the parents and teachers like those who get high scores in the examination. The higher grades one gets, the higher praise he/she get from parents and teachers, while the poorer grades one gets, the higher criticism one gets. In China, especially in high-school, there is always a roll call rearranging students from the grades the students get, the higher one get, the former his/her name is put ahead. Furthermore, the grades are directly connected with the college-entry examination which is critical to their future careers of higher education. So students all fight for a better grades over others so as they can get a better higher education. In short, it is the grade system ferments the competition between students and this competition is beneficial to heighten the morale of students for learning.

While it is instructive for grade system to run its way, overemphasis of the grade system is increasingly compelling the education system at stake. Moreover, ironically, this educational hot potato brings two disadvantages which spring from just the two aspects of the advantages of grade system forgoing.

First and foremost, overemphasis the importance of grade can mask the eyes of the students insofar as they wrongly and unconsciously misarrange the grades as their pursuing targets and ardent in the arguing with the teacher on whether the grades can be added one or two in this place or another. That scene is fatuous but does plays everyday in our school in China. Moreover grades result in sever critical events, such as cheating, plagiary in the classroom, bribery to the teacher for adding scores. On the other hand, the leading status of grades drives students in a state of nervousness which tense and relax with the ebb and flow of scores. Furthermore, the grade system leads a gap between students. Those higher grade owners will not help the lower grade owners for not only unwilling to sacrifice time and energy to explain, but also fearing to uncover the secret of their success. All those cases are detriment to the education.

Secondly, the aim of education is not for the silly and meaningless grades in the paper, too much attention can degenerate the education as a whole. Generally speaking, the aim of education is to foster people for our society in all fields, but the grade system somewhat oppose to this aim. For instance, every year in China, there are amounts of students with high grades but low ability going to the society. And many of them who get higher grades in the universities are bogged down in the real society. Who or what should take the responsibility of these consequences? Undeniably, the grade system plays a harmful role, at least in partly. After all, society needs person with ability, not person with numbers.

In sum, the grade system is a double-edged sword which can be not only beneficial but also pernicious to the educational system due to rightly or wrongly usage. If we apply the “sword” rightly and appropriately, it can benefit our educational system, but if we overstate the importance of it and even misuse it, it can mislead us to the opposite way, and finally threaten our educational system.

我要飞UID: 171394

自己顶一下

eveningboatUID: 157918

请不要指定斑竹，会让别人反感
另外，这个是互动论坛，想让别人改自己的文章，请先给别人修改
建议看一下置顶的帖子

buggodUID: 164979

老大可是义务的，你酱紫可是可是不好的，应该先做做贡献
呵呵

littlebird_tslUID: 170966

litmus test ,at stake,hot potato ,ebb and flow ,bog down及文中的一些单词,让不不得不佩服楼主的词汇储备,敢问这篇文章花了你多长时间?

除了偶尔有一点拼写错误和语法错误以及段落太多外,整篇文章个人认为非常有逻辑性

我要飞UID: 171394

"指定斑竹，会让别人反感" 不好意思哈，没有想到这么多哈，刚刚起步issue，不知道自己能不能帮别人改作文哈，以后我试着改改看哈
to  littlebird_tsl
时间是大大超时了的，先想着练习下语言和逻辑吧，3个小时的说

naiba369UID: 131655

楼主和我昨天写的题目一样，看看，大家交流一下。你给我的文章提点建议吗？ 一句话也好，
楼主的长文我先存上，感觉很牛的样子。研究先，再发表意见

我的文章见签名档的链接。

thx

我要飞UID: 171394

naiba369很厉害啊，也欢迎多砸我啊，我还有文章没贴出来哈

对了我们组成改文小组吧？如何，相互改，本人10g  8.25考 成都

naiba369UID: 131655

我尽力吧，最近的计划很疯狂－－每日2 issue, 2 argu，现在还很差呢。argu没怎么写呢

我要飞UID: 171394

naba，你社么时间考的啊 ？我argu 写了4篇就没写了，比较简单感觉
issue写了6个大概，这个比较麻烦啊

阿秀UID: 137492

issue55"Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education." 追求高分严重的限制了教育各阶段的学习质量。

Ever since students go to school, whatever fundamental school, middle-school or high-school, even after harsh competition they finally go to the ivory towers, there is always one thing bound with them--grades. Some students like grades, while others hate them. Contemporary educationalists and educationists are arguing whether the competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education. In my opinion, the lasting existence of the grade system itself proves its justification to some extend, yet, overzealous pursuit to the grades, of course, deviates the destination of educational system.(好长的开头，前面的铺垫是不是有点太多了，看280的时候觉得老外很少有这样写法的)

In the realm of education, grade system, weather (whether) in the form of percentage in China or in the form of A, B, C, D four levers in America, has been a standard to classify students into several groups: the excellent, the good, the pass and the failed. As far as I am concerned, the grade system meets the need of educational system at least in two aspects.

First and fundamentally, grade can reflect the effectiveness of education in all level. Common thing (common thing 是不是等于 common sense?) tell (tells) us it is useless to do anything without a standard. Though the feedback of grades echoed from students, (这句话好象不完整啊) the teachers can know which course are better mastered and which course are weakly learned, which (which part ?) of the students are needed to be further informed, so as to improve their teaching and help those failed or unlearned. Till now, since there is no other more well-chosen and well-grounded system comes (coming) into being, the extant grade system as a standard should be still (remain) put into use. In fact, grade now is often served as an effective litmus test to test the effects of both teaching and learning which definitely play an active role in education.

Second, grade system can ignite an atmosphere of competition and compel the students to fight for a higher education (grade?). All the parents and teachers like those who get high scores in the examination. The higher grades one gets, the higher praise he/she get from parents and teachers, while the poorer grades one gets, the higher criticism one gets. (get 有点太多了) In China, especially in high-school, there is always a roll call (call是什么意思？) rearranging students from (by?) the grades the students get, the higher one get, the former his/her name is put ahead. Furthermore, the grades are directly connected with the college-entry examination which is critical to their future careers of higher education. So students all fight for a better grades over others so as (so that) they can get a better higher education. In short, it is the grade system ferments the competition between (among) students and this competition is beneficial to heighten the morale of students for learning. (我读来，这段只是指出了评分体系创造了竞争环境，可是没有看出好处)

While it is instructive for grade system to run its way, overemphasis of the grade system is increasingly compelling the education system at stake. Moreover, ironically, this educational hot potato brings two disadvantages which spring from just the two aspects of the advantages of grade system forgoing.

First and foremost, overemphasis the importance of grade can mask the eyes of the students insofar as they wrongly and unconsciously misarrange the grades as their pursuing targets and ardent in the arguing with the teacher on whether the grades can be added one or two in this place or another. That scene is fatuous but does plays everyday in our school in China. Moreover grades result in sever critical events, such as cheating, plagiary in the classroom, bribery to the teacher for adding scores. On the other hand, the leading status of grades drives students in a state of nervousness which tense and relax with the ebb and flow of scores. Furthermore, the grade system leads a gap between students. Those higher grade owners will not help the lower grade owners for not only unwilling to sacrifice time and energy to explain, but also fearing to uncover the secret of their success. All those cases are detriment to the education.

Secondly, the aim of education is not for the silly and meaningless grades in the paper, too much attention can degenerate the education as a whole. Generally speaking, the aim of education is to foster people for our society in all fields, but the grade system somewhat oppose to this aim. For instance, every year in China, there are amounts of students with high grades but low ability going to the society. And many of them who get higher grades in the universities are bogged down in the real society. Who or what should take the responsibility of these consequences? Undeniably, the grade system plays a harmful role, at least in partly. After all, society needs person with ability, not person with numbers.

In sum, the grade system is a double-edged sword which can be not only beneficial but also pernicious to the educational system due to rightly or wrongly usage. If we apply the “sword” rightly and appropriately, it can benefit our educational system, but if we overstate the importance of it and even misuse it, it can mislead us to the opposite way, and finally threaten our educational system.
(写得不错啊，不过我觉得有点太四平八稳了，就算有正有负，那么现在情况如何呢？
另外帮我看一篇吧，谢谢了先  :rolleyes: ：　https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=210817　)

naiba369UID: 131655

偶8月20

我要飞UID: 171394

意见很中肯，我先研究下哈
看你的名字就知道issue没问题啦
你的文章我考下来研究下在回复哈

我要飞UID: 171394

谢谢阿秀，共同进步！
1.Common thing (common thing 是不是等于 common sense?)
   我打错了字拉，common sense，555
2。Though the feedback of grades echoed from students, (这句话好象不完整啊)  是throuth我打成了though
3.fight for a higher education (grade?) 我是说受到更好的教育，不是说分数，是不是这样子表达不对？字用的不准？
4.roll call 是词组 n.点名, 名单, 登记表