- 最后登录
- 2006-5-25
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 787
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2003-11-24
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 5
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 357
- UID
- 150275
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 787
- 注册时间
- 2003-11-24
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 5
|
真心感谢migao的砖头,真是砖砖见血啊,尤其是body1,2,3的评述,感觉很有建设性,我刚按着你的意见改了一遍,再发上来,大伙接着拍,至于“例子举的不是很恰当”我还没来得及换,俺在找找,争取早点法上来。
再次感谢migao ;) 期待你的文章,俺也拍拍啊
第一遍改文:
I disagree with the statement above. In my opinion, from people whose views contradict ours we can often learn much more than from people whose views we share, although sometimes disagreement can undermine learning by causing stress.
换了一下语序,俺实在觉得没啥可说了,兄弟可有好点的的开头
First of all, I tend to ask the question the statement above concealed: what can agreement and disagreement give us during learning? Undoubtedly, from people whose views we agree with, we can learn some information and knowledge. In fact, what we learned in this way is limited within an original extent narrowed by the agreement with others, because they are merely more accurate and detailed than what we hold. In contrast, the disagreement from people whose views contradict our own implies that there are possibilities of comprehension and solution of others beyond what we originally hold. Therefore, in front of disagreement we can learn much more not only from others through reconsidering the same thing in different views, but also from ourselves by scanning our deficiencies than from people whose views are similar to ours.
俺把第三四句调整了顺序。这段是想作为外围段,即先让步,接agreement的局限性,然后话锋一转到disagreement的相对好处,最后一句细化一下总论点引起下文
The most important reason for my statement is that when others disagree with us, from their distinct comprehension to the same thing we can learn to understand the same thing in new views and fresh concepts beyond our own primary thought. Sometimes others' agreement would make us so confident that we consider something only in one way or exclude other ideas, leading to our narrow sights in a limited scope. For instance, when clone technology was first taught in biology classes in our university, my classmates and I were attracted to choose it as our elective course, because we all believed that human beings could benefit from its application in every field without any negative points. But the students majoring in anthropology disagreed with us. In a later intense dispute with the opponents, when we were asked to reconsider the impact of "clone" in the future on Human ethic, we learned that it would be really a big risk without strict limitation from long views. From the disagreement we learn the negative points and potential danger of “clone” rather than from the mild communication among ourselves.
Not only can disagreement help us learn more comprehensive understanding to the world around us, but also enable us to learn how to resolve problems more properly by rejudging our primary projects and solution. For example, ten years ago, many medicine researchers in Japan worked hard together in order to reduce the side effect of antibiotic in treatment. They believed that western medicine could resolve the problem, but until last year they got little progress even with the help of authorities of western medicine from Europe. It is interesting that several Chinese medicine experts were also researching the same issue in China. They held the different views from western medicine in that it ignored the significance of traditional herb. However recently, it is disagreement from Chinese medicine awoke Japanese researchers to add some herb into their research in another way and reconsider the relationship between western medicine and Chinese medicine. Then they found a new method to reduce the side-effect of antibiotic by combining the traditional Chinese herb and their western medicine theory.
Admittedly, sometimes disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. However, if we can deal with disagreement in an active way, it would do good to our learning. In the final analysis, we can usually learn much more from disagreement than from agreement |
|