issue 36 请大家给点意见，一句话也行，谢谢，祝大家新春快乐~~

nickaaronleeUID: 183378

36"The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries."
TS:
1，后人评价前人比较不易为利益等自身因素所左右，而同时代的人，相互之间所作出的评价很容易因为自己的主观利益而影响他们的判断。
2，同时代的人因为处于相同的社会环境、时间甚至空间之中，很容易受到当时社会潮流的影响。
3，后人对于前人可以将它放在较长的时间段中进行评价，与自己所处的时代进行对比，得出的结论将更具有现实意义。
————正文————
Can the greatness of individuals be decided by those who live after them or by their contemporaries? Their contemporaries may share the same values with them of the same era. However, I fundamentally agree that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them. Time is the best way to justify individuals’ greatness. The later generations have a more objective and accurate judgment on the individuals than their contemporaries.

Later generations may not be influenced by the some kind of interests and other facts of themselves. However, the contemporaries' judgments are easily affected by their subjective opinions. For example, Socrates, a great Greek philosopher, was sentenced to death, just because he announced his philosophical ideas in public, which offended the authority's interests. Then and there Socrates' ideas were not accepted by his contemporaries and he was even regarded as a criminal. Nevertheless, now things have changed that people are thoroughly recognized his ideas and consider him as one of the greatest philosophers. Thus, later generations have more impartial judgments on the greatness of our ancestors, which indicates that the contemporaries have a limited judgments that may lead them to unwarranted conclusions.

The contemporaries that lived in the same social circumstances and era even space with the individuals we judge of are readily influenced by the social trends of that time. In this case their judgments are not equitable, sometimes even incorrect. For instance, in the Middle Ages the ecclesiae claimed that all witches, considered as evil, should be burned to death. Then adherents throughout Europe began to franticly slaughter those women that they considered as witches no matter what the women really were. People of that time thought what the ecclesiae decided were all correct and advocated without any doubts regardless how ridiculer decisions they made. Obviously, present people are definitely opposed to what the ecclesiae decided at that time and regard the Middle Ages as the Dark Ages, during which the truth was distorted and humanity was neglected. Therefore, the later generations have a more accurate and equitable judgments on the previous individuals without the influences of social elements of that time.

The later generations judge the former individuals during a long period of time throughout the history, by contrast to the contemporaries; their conclusions may have more present meanings. As Posner, the famous founder of law and literature movements, concludes that in the literary history it is those works that are appreciated, remembered and inherited generation by generation are real masterpieces. Take Jade as an example. His works were regarded as masterpieces by his contemporaries, while presently what he wrote is not accepted by most of us. With his works becoming to be forgotten, Jade is getting to lose the honor of master. Thus, contrary to the contemporaries, the later generations' judgments have more significant modern meanings, which may instruct us to have a better understanding of our previous individuals.

In sum up, the judgments of contemporaries are not objective and impartial due to different influences of the standards or authorities of their time. With the evaluating of the history modern people may have a more objective, fair and significant judgments of our ancestors.

louchen1984UID: 172975

Can the greatness of individuals be decided by those who live after them or by their contemporaries? Their contemporaries may share the same values with them of the same era. However, I fundamentally agree that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them. Time is the best way to justify individuals’ greatness. The later generations have a more objective and accurate judgment on the individuals than their contemporaries.

Later generations may not be influenced by the 【the去掉】some kind of interests and other facts of themselves【改成their personal interests and stakes会好些，other facts 不明确】. However,【这两句应该是并列不是转折吧】 the contemporaries' judgments are easily affected by their subjective opinions. For example, Socrates, a 【the】great Greek philosopher, was sentenced to death, just because he announced his philosophical ideas in public, which offended the authority's interests【offend authority】. Then and there Socrates' ideas were not accepted by his contemporaries and he was even regarded as a criminal. Nevertheless, now things have changed that【and】 people are【have】 thoroughly recognized his ideas and consider him as one of the greatest philosophers. Thus, later generations have more impartial judgments on the greatness of our ancestors, which indicates that the contemporaries have a limited judgments that may lead them to unwarranted conclusions.

The contemporaries that lived in the same social circumstances and era even space with the individuals we judge of are readily influenced by the social trends of that time. In this case their judgments are not equitable, sometimes even incorrect. For instance, in the Middle Ages the ecclesiae claimed that all witches, considered as evil, should be burned to death. Then adherents throughout Europe began to franticly slaughter those women that they considered as witches no matter what the women really were. People of that time thought what the ecclesiae decided were all correct and advocated without any doubts regardless how ridiculer decisions they made. Obviously, present people are definitely opposed to what the ecclesiae decided at that time and regard the Middle Ages as the Dark Ages, during which the truth was distorted and humanity was neglected. Therefore, the later generations have a more accurate and equitable judgments on the previous individuals without the influences of social elements of that time.【body1和body2其实是一回事情吧，2是1的一部分,这部分结构应该再安排一下哦】


The later generations judge the former individuals during a long【改成comparatively long 比较好，题目并没说是经过很长时间以后,说不定只是他死后没几年】 period of time throughout the history, by contrast to the contemporaries; their conclusions may have more present meanings. As Posner, the famous founder of law and literature movements, concludes that in the literary history 【only whose works 】are appreciated, remembered and inherited generation by generation are real masterpieces. Take Jade as an example. His works were regarded as masterpieces by his contemporaries, while presently what he wrote is not accepted by most of us. With his works becoming to be forgotten【不太通】, Jade is getting to【get to不是持续动作】 lose the honor of master.【这里要说明他的作品确实没有价值，而不是说后人不欣赏就说明它不好后人的判断也有可能是错的】 Thus, contrary to the contemporaries, the later generations' judgments have more significant modern meanings, which may instruct us to have a better understanding of our previous individuals.

In sum up, the judgments of contemporaries are not objective and impartial due to different influences of the standards or authorities of their time. With the evaluating of the history modern people may have a more objective, fair and significant judgments of our ancestors.
条理很清楚，就是body3好像不够充实

nickaaronleeUID: 183378

谢谢louchen1984的修改，我已经记下了，body3我也觉得有些不妥，我再好好研究一下，呵呵，鸡年快乐哦~~~

windpassmeUID: 153908

36"The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries."
TS:
1，后人评价前人比较不易为利益等自身因素所左右，而同时代的人，相互之间所作出的评价很容易因为自己的主观利益而影响他们的判断。
2，同时代的人因为处于相同的社会环境、时间甚至空间之中，很容易受到当时社会潮流的影响。
3，后人对于前人可以将它放在较长的时间段中进行评价，与自己所处的时代进行对比，得出的结论将更具有现实意义。
————正文————
Can the greatness of individuals be decided by those who live after them or by their contemporaries? Their contemporaries may share the same values with them of the same era. However, I fundamentally agree that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them. Time is the best way to justify individuals’ greatness. The later generations have a more objective and accurate judgment on the individuals than their contemporaries.

Later generations may not be influenced by the some kind of interests and other facts of themselves（可改为interest conflict利益冲突）. However, the contemporaries' judgments are easily affected by their subjective opinions. For example, Socrates, a great Greek philosopher, was sentenced to death, just because he announced his philosophical ideas in public, which offended the authority's interests. Then and there Socrates' ideas were not accepted by his contemporaries（改为倒装？因为楼主已经用副词开头了，不过也无所谓阿） and he was even regarded as a criminal. Nevertheless, now things have changed that people are thoroughly recognized his ideas and consider him as one of the greatest philosophers. Thus, later generations have more impartial judgments on the greatness of our ancestors, which indicates that the contemporaries have a limited judgments that may lead them to unwarranted conclusions.

The contemporaries that lived in the same social circumstances and era even space（even space 可以删去） with the individuals we judge of are readily influenced by the social trends of that time. In this case their judgments are not equitable, sometimes even incorrect. For instance, in the Middle Ages the ecclesiae claimed that all witches, considered as evil, should be burned to death. Then adherents throughout Europe began to franticly slaughter those women that they considered as witches no matter what the women really were. People of that time thought what the ecclesiae decided were all correct and advocated without any doubts regardless how ridiculer decisions they made. Obviously, present people are definitely opposed to what the ecclesiae decided at that time and regard the Middle Ages as the Dark Ages, during which the truth was distorted and humanity was neglected. Therefore, the later generations have a more accurate and equitable judgments on the previous individuals without the influences of social elements of that time.
我同意二楼的，其实上两端讲的是一样东西，合并下会比较好，二千磨女的例子实际上牵扯到政治，并不单纯是追赶潮流的问题

The later generations judge the former individuals during a long period of time throughout the history, by contrast to the contemporaries; their conclusions may have more present meanings. （As Posner, the famous founder of law and literature movements, concludes that in the literary history it is those works that are appreciated, remembered and inherited generation by generation are real masterpieces.）这段好像是天外飞仙啊。 Take Jade as an example. His works were regarded as masterpieces by his contemporaries, while presently what he wrote is not accepted by most of us. With his works becoming to be forgotten, Jade is getting to lose the honor of master. Thus, contrary to the contemporaries, the later generations' judgments have more significant modern meanings, which may instruct us to have a better understanding of our previous individuals.

In sum up（in sum/to sum up), the judgments of contemporaries are not objective and impartial due to different influences of the standards or authorities of their time. With the evaluating of the history modern people may have a more objective, fair and significant judgments of our ancestors.

  
  
楼主的提纲列的大好

nickaaronleeUID: 183378

谢谢windpassme的意见，我写的时候也觉得当中两个部分差不多，但是感觉中间3段比较好，就分开了。你的文章我一会就看：）

xiongyicnUID: 192745

36"The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries."
TS:
1，后人评价前人比较不易为利益等自身因素所左右，而同时代的人，相互之间所作出的评价很容易因为自己的主观利益而影响他们的判断。
2，同时代的人因为处于相同的社会环境、时间甚至空间之中，很容易受到当时社会潮流的影响。
3，后人对于前人可以将它放在较长的时间段中进行评价，与自己所处的时代进行对比，得出的结论将更具有现实意义。
————正文————
Can the greatness of individuals be decided by those who live after them or by their contemporaries? Their contemporaries may share the same values with them of the same era. However用一个however在这里感觉不够smooth, I fundamentally agree that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them. Time is the best way to justify individuals’ greatness. The later generations have a more objective and accurate judgment on the individuals than their contemporaries.

在这里加一个transition phrase是不是感觉好一点Later generations may not be influenced by the some kind sof interests and other facts of themselves. However, the contemporaries' judgments are easily affected by their subjective opinions. For example, Socrates, a great Greek philosopher, was sentenced to death, just because he announced his philosophical ideas in public, which offended the authority's interests. Then and there Socrates' ideas were not accepted by his contemporaries and he was even regarded as a criminal. Nevertheless, now things have changed that people are thoroughly recognized his ideas and consider him as one of the greatest philosophers. Thus, later generations have more impartial judgments on the greatness of our ancestors, which indicates that the contemporaries have a limited judgments that may lead them to unwarranted conclusions.你这一段如果第一句是TS，那么整段应该更深入地充分展开来论述由于当代人自身利益而导致的不公正的评判，不该再提出后半部分

The contemporaries that lived in the same social circumstances and era even space with the individuals we judge of are readily influenced by the social trends of that time. In this case their judgments are not equitable, sometimes even incorrect. For instance, in the Middle Ages the ecclesiae claimed that all witches, considered as evil, should be burned to death. Then adherents throughout Europe began to franticly slaughter those women that they considered as witches no matter what the women really were. People of that time thought what the ecclesiae decided were all correct and advocated without any doubts regardless how ridiculer decisions they made. Obviously, present people are definitely opposed to what the ecclesiae decided at that time and regard the Middle Ages as the Dark Ages, during which the truth was distorted and humanity was neglected. Therefore, the later generations have a more accurate and equitable judgments on the previous individuals without the influences of social elements of that time.

The later generations judge the former individuals during a long period of time throughout the history, by contrast to the contemporaries; their conclusions may have more present meanings. As Posner, the famous founder of law and literature movements, concludes that in the literary history it is those works that are appreciated, remembered and inherited generation by generation are real masterpieces. Take Jade as an example. His works were regarded as masterpieces by his contemporaries, while presently what he wrote is not accepted by most of us. With his works becoming to be forgotten, Jade is getting to lose the honor of master. Thus, contrary to the contemporaries, the later generations' judgments have more significant modern meanings, which may instruct us to have a better understanding of our previous individuals.

In sum up, the judgments of contemporaries are not objective and impartial due to different influences of the standards or authorities of their time. With the evaluating of the history modern people may have a more objective, fair and significant judgments of our ancestors.

逻辑上还是很清晰的，只是论证感觉还是没有深入下去，如果能充分地展开，深入还是很不错的。还有就是注意有写拼写词法的错误

nickaaronleeUID: 183378

谢谢xiongyicn的意见，其实我也想深入，但是想不出怎么深入，就平行的写了。还有，我自己修改已经把拼写错误都改正了啊~~你的第三篇我已经帮你看过了，呵呵~~