- 最后登录
- 2006-12-4
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 7858
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-8-4
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 21
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 4942
- UID
- 172975
  
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 7858
- 注册时间
- 2004-8-4
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 21
|
非常感谢nightsky2004 和 冥界星灿, 感觉被批的体无完肤了, 非常感谢~~~
修改如下:
Should education be designed to meet the requirements and interests of every individual, in order to be truly effective?这句是为了字数,还是不删了 The speaker claims so. I concede that it is a primary purpose of education to satisfy different students' demand, however, this allegation neglects other functions of education as well as the impossibility to cater for every student.
Admittedly, the education system should be supposed to help students grow into competitive and expert adults serving in different realms, which requires a variety of teaching methods and opportunities for their mastering of knowledge and skills. This is because that students have their respective interests and needs resulted from their special domestic background, local culture, religious beliefs, and intelligence as well. What is more, by human nature students are more motivated to pursue courses and extracurricular activities which they are fond of. Therefore teachers and educators are obliged to discover their genuine interests and then provide opportunities for them to lift those interests to a higher academic level. At the same time, students' varied ideals and their dfferent goals in career result in their different demand of education, the education system may offer a satisfying solution to this problem by means of establishing a series of specialized schools such as normal schools, as well as divide universities and colleges into specialized departments. In short, nurturing a student's interest as well as equipping him with what he needs for his goals will bring up not only a more efficient worker in any field but also a better contributor to the whole society.
However, it is also the function of education to help a student blossom into a well-rounded and well-socialized adult. To reach this goal schools should enact a uniformed curriculum which includes arts, science, sociology, philosophy, politics and other disciplines, even if some of them are not appreciated by students. Also in a highly cooperative modern society, those who cannot adapt to the ever-changing environment and cannot understand, respect, appreciate others will soon fall by the waysides. Only trough accordant and consolidated education can one obtain common knowledge, appreciate fundamental virtues, as well as become familiar with public policies and affairs. Accordingly, an undue emphasis on personal interests and individualism will seperate a student from others and thus wil do no good to him.Therefore, if teachers and educators pay too much attention to meet students' personal interests while neglect their well-round knowledge as well as their socialization and cooperation, then the educational system will probably fail, not to mention effective.
What is more, the speaker fails to take into account other factors influencing the performance of education, which may make it unpractical to meet every student's needs. For example, such education impels teachers to first explore students' interests, then unearth their potential, thirdly plan their special courses, and finally instruct him to reach his goal step by step. This is apparently impossible for one teacher to teach a group of students, and thus it requests a "one-to-one" pattern of education and a huge number of teachers and school administrators. Obviously, project of this kind is inefficient and will unavoidably add a heavy burden on government's budget which would otherwise be severed to solve other meaningful pressing social problems.
To sum up, if we were to take the speaker's advice too far we would risk nuturing a generation lack of uniform and harmony. On balance I agree that students' different interests and needs should be taken into consideration, yet an overdue emphasis on the divergence amounts to a waste of time and money. |
|