argument 61(机经) 大家看看吧，必回拍！！

chenxgUID: 183868

Argument61: 403 words   30 minutes
The following appeared in a report by the School District of Eyleria.
'Nationally, the average ratio of computers to students in kindergarten through grade 12 (K-12) is 1:5. Educators indicate that this is very good ratio. This means that across the country, all students have access to and can use computers daily in their classrooms. In Eyleria's K-12 schools, the ratio of computers to students is 1:7. This number is sufficient to ensure that all of Eyleria's students, by the time they graduate from high school, will be fully proficient in the use of computer technology. Thus, there is no reason to spend any of the schools' budget on computers or other technology in the next few years.'

The argument draws the conclusion that it is unnecessary to spend any of the schools' budget on computers or technology in the next few years for Eyleria on the basis of several figures and specious evidences. However the argument is ungrounded on several reasons.

First of all, the argument fails to assure that the national survey in K-12 reflect the situation of all of students, and it is hasty to draw the conclusion that across all the students have access to and use computers in their classrooms. It is an average ratio of computers, and it is possible that  it has higher ratio in rich regions however lower ratio in poor regions. And it is possible for students of rich regions to have access to use computer in their classrooms, however it is other direction for students of poor regions. In addition, the ration just stands the level of K-12, probably for the other grades, it is impossible to use computer daily.

Additionally, the argument provides no evidence that the average ration of computer in Eyleria can make the all students have access to use computers daily in their classroom. The national average ration of computer is 1:5, but is 1:7 in Eyleria, therefore it needs more detailed information to assure that for students of Eyleria the ration of computer is sufficient to ensure all of Eyleria's students in use of computer technology. Even if the ration in Eyleria is enough, it is entirely possible that computers in Eyleria are forbidden to use daily. Consequently, some detailed information in use of computer is needed

Finally, even if the ration in Eyleria is enough and computers are allowed to use daily, the evidence that average ration of computer in Eyleria does not mean that all of Eyleria's students will be fully proficient in the use of computer technology. It is possible that school in Eyleria has not enough teachers, who are familiar with the computer technology. And most of students are not interested the computer technology. Thus, it is unreasonable that students will be fully proficient in use of computer technology when they graduate from high school. Maybe all of computers are outdated, so it is needed to spend additional money.

In sum, to support the argument it would need  much detailed information as follows: the relationship between national survey and Eyleria's survey; whether Eyleria's students have the ability of using computer technology.

zhoulin00001UID: 189304

The argument draws the conclusion that it is unnecessary to spend any of the schools' budget on computers or technology in the next few years for Eyleria on the basis of several figures and specious evidences. However the argument is ungrounded on several reasons.

First of all, the argument fails to assure that the national survey in K-12 reflect the situation of all of students, and it is hasty to draw the conclusion that across all the students have access to and use computers in their classrooms. It is an average ratio of computersto students, and it is possible that it has higher ratio in rich regions however不能放句中吧？ lower ratio in poor regions. And it is possible for students of rich regions to have access to use computer in their classrooms, however it is other direction for students of poor regions. 贫穷地区用不上和我们有什么关系？只要我们能用上就行了In addition, the ration just stands the level of K-12, probably for the other grades, it is impossible to use computer daily.这个很好

Additionally, the argument provides no evidence that the average ration of computer in Eyleria can make the all students have access to use computers daily in their classroom. The national average ration of computer is 1:5, but is 1:7 in Eyleria, therefore it needs more detailed information to assure that for students of Eyleria the ration of computer is sufficient to ensure all of Eyleria's students in use of computer technology. Even if the ration in Eyleria is enough, it is entirely possible that computers in Eyleria are forbidden to use daily很勉强. Consequently, some detailed information in use of computer is needed

Finally, even if the ration in Eyleria is enough and computers are allowed to use daily, the evidence that average ration of computer in Eyleria does not mean that all of Eyleria's students will be fully proficient in the use of computer technology. It is possible that school in Eyleria has not enough teachers, who are familiar with the computer technology. And most of students are not interested the computer technology. Thus, it is unreasonable that students will be fully proficient in use of computer technology when they graduate from high school.这和计算机是否够用有关吗？ Maybe all of computers are outdated, so it is needed to spend additional money.

In sum, to support the argument it would need much detailed information as follows: the relationship between national survey and Eyleria's survey; whether Eyleria's students have the ability of using computer technology.
感觉错误批驳的有问题（如上），还有其他漏洞，比如将来是否够用，其他设备等，没有提及，个人意见，仅供参考}

lindaliUID: 185012

There are some points I want to talk with you:
I think K-12 means from kindergarten to grade 12
Ration means a fixed portion. Although it has some relationship with ratio, I think ratio is better. This argument uses ratio

The argument draws the conclusion that it is unnecessary to spend any of the schools' budget on computers or technology in the next few years for Eyleria on the basis of several figures and specious evidences. However the argument is ungrounded on several reasons.

First of all, the argument fails to assure that the national survey in K-12 reflect the situation of all of studentsall students, and it is hasty to draw the conclusion that across all the students have access to and use computers in their classrooms. It is an average ratio of computers, and it is possible that it has higher ratio in rich regions however ,however,lower ratio in poor regions. And it is possible for students of rich regions to have access to use computer in their classrooms, however it is other direction for students of poor regions. In addition, the rationratiojust stands the level of K-12k-12 means from kindergarten to grade 12,not only grade 12?? You can use grade 12 here , probably for the other grades, it is impossible to use computer daily.

Additionally, the argument provides no evidence that the average ration of computer in Eyleria can make the all students have access to use computers daily in their classroom. The national average ration of computer is 1:5, but is 1:7 in Eyleria, therefore it needs more detailed information to assure that for students of Eyleria the ration of computer is sufficient to ensure all of Eyleria's students in use of computer technology. Even if the ration in Eyleria is enough, it is entirely possible Is 'entirely' appropriate? that computers in Eyleria are forbidden to use daily. why? Consequently, some detailed information in use of computer is needed

Finally, even if the ration in Eyleria is enough and computers are allowed to use daily, the evidence that average ration of computer in Eyleria does not mean that all of Eyleria's students will be fully proficient in the use of computer technology. It is possible that school in Eyleria has not enough teachers, who are familiar with the computer technology. And most of students are not interested inthe computer technology. Thus, it is unreasonable that students will be fully proficient in use of computer technology when they graduate from high school. Maybe all of computers are outdated, so it is needed to spend additional money.

In sumsummary?, to support the argument it would need much detailed information as follows: the relationship between national survey and Eyleria's survey; whether Eyleria's students have the ability of using computer technology.not complete?

lindaliUID: 185012

也帮我改一下吧，谢谢。