Issue87 必回拍，请大家多多指导 ：）

alex_hustUID: 197601

题目：In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.

Recently there is a lot of debate over the question that whether it is more probable for the beginner than the expert in a field of inquiry to make important discoveries. Some people assert that the beginner is so creative that it is easier for them to break traditional rules and make important discoveries. While others argue that the expert with wide and deep knowledge can make important discoveries with less difficulties. As far as i am concerned, the expert is more competitive to make important discoveries.
On the one hand, the beginner studying in such a field is lack of basic knowledge which is the foundation of any discoveries. Any person, if he wants to discover some important thing, first of all, should know some basic principles in that field and have   professional sensitivity in order to notice every detail. Otherwise, he may miss some valuable details, even when he gets the detail, without professional knowledge, he still find nothing in the end. How can a 9 years old student in a primary school discover the famous Newton's principles?
On the other hand, the experts in that field can make important discoveries through making rational assumptions and making precise experiments to prove his assumptions. A famous example is the American scientist Einstein. Einstein's most important contribution to human society is his famous principle of relativity which introduce a brand new perspective for people to understand this world. Due to his great knowledge about the relationship between space and time, he found that time is a very important factor influencing the status of a substance.
Admittedly, experts in such a field may have so much focus on one thing that he seldom to notice other important relative phenomena, unfortunately, he would miss a lot of discoveries. What's more, over believing in his knowledge and experience about one phenomenon would be a obstacle for him to discover new principles or theories. Therefore, experts in such a field should be brave to break traditional rules in that field, should widen his scope of knowledge, should have more discussion with others to find inspiration to find more and more discoveries.
In sum, it is much easier for the experts to make important discoveries because of their rich basic knowledge and professional sensitivity in their pursuit of truth. Yet any expert who aims at make more and more discoveries to contribute to this whole world, should has more discussion with others to widen his insight to give us more fabulous surprise.

时间：48分钟   字数：417

zhoulin00001UID: 189304

Recently there is a lot of debate over the question that whether it is more probable for the beginner than the expert in a field of inquiry to make important discoveries. Some people assert that the beginner is so creative that it is easier for them to break traditional rules and make important discoveries. While others argue that the expert with wide and deep knowledge can make important discoveries with less difficulties. As far as iI am concerned, the expert is more competitive to make important discoveries.
On the one hand, the beginner studying in such a field is lack of basic knowledge which is the foundation of any discoveries. Any person, if he wants to discover some important thing, first of all, should know some basic principles in that field and have professional sensitivity in order to notice every detail. Otherwise, he may miss some valuable details, even when he gets the detail, without professional knowledge, he still find nothing in the end. How can a 9 years old student in a primary school discover the famous Newton's principles?
On the other hand, the experts in that field can make important discoveries through making rational assumptions and making precise experiments to prove his assumptions. A famous example is the American scientist Einstein. Einstein's most important contribution to human society is his famous principle of relativity which introduce a brand new perspective for people to understand this world. Due to his great knowledge about the relationship between space and time, he found that time is a very important factor influencing the status of a substance.例子的说明和主旨句不符，似乎应该说靠他的设想和精确的实验获得的成功才比较呼应吧
Admittedly, experts in such a field may have so much focus on one thing that he seldom to notice other important relative phenomena, unfortunately连接的不好, he would miss a lot of discoveries. What's more, over believing in his knowledge and experience about one phenomenon would be a obstacle for him to discover new principles or theories. Therefore, experts in such a field should be brave to break traditional rules in that field, should widen his scope of knowledge, should have more discussion with others to find inspiration to find more and more discoveries.
In sum, it is much easier for the experts to make important discoveries because of their rich basic knowledge and professional sensitivity in their pursuit of truth. Yet any expert who aims at make more and more discoveries to contribute to this whole world, should has more discussion with others to widen his insight to give us more fabulous surprise对第三段总结的不好.
总体感觉不错，很有条理，建议如上，仅供参考

alex_hustUID: 197601

谢谢，但是我还是觉得差距很大，写的不是很好，等我晚上回拍你的issue，谢谢！！