issue202,机经题，限时，请大家拍砖。请附上你文章的链接。

hardbeaverUID: 197443

Issue202  第7篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧！
------摘要------
作者：寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间：45分8秒     423 words
从2005年2月2日19时19分到2005年2月2日20时45分
------题目------
Unlike great thinkers and great artists, the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise.
------正文------
There is always a controverasy that whether political leaders should yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. As far as I am concerned, political leaders,unlike the great thinkers and artists,should pay enough attention to both their own opinion and the public opinion and combine them intelligently to  lead the society effectively.

In the first place, great thinkers and artists do not need pay much attention to the critics from public. As we all know, the work of both thinkers and artists is a creation, which is just derived from their originality and inspiration, so people has little influence on their work during the process of creation.Furthormore, most times the work created by great thinkers and artists is so complex and profound that it reaches beyond the limit of public's knowledge and approciation,thus even the general people cannot understand the meaning of their work, say nothing of making advice or critics.

In the second place, unlike great thinkers and artists,political leaders should prudently consider the opinion of public in order to make a suitable decision depending on particular conditions.On the one hand,the leaders, who are always outstanding in their fields, have the stronger abilities to see problems clearly,to catch the essence of the problems and to bring out solutions to the problems. When they make decisions, they must have considered them prudently,so there is no reason for them to changer their decisions and yield to public easily.On the other hand,public have tremendous influence on the leaders.Political leaders should first gain the support of public, which is the precondition of their leading, so they can not totally reject what the public say. Further, since the public can see the problem from more perspectives, they may make a clearer information about the problem, which may be useful for the leaders to make decisions.

Finally, the political leaders should keep aware of going to the extreme, that is, accepting opinion of public without doubt. We know, the opinion of public often expresses the desire of the general people,which may be just a express sometimes, neither reasoning nor scientific, so political leaders should think over it prudently before deciding whether to accept it or to reject it.

In conclusion, the political leaders should take into consideration both opinions, from their own and from the public and draw the merits of them, in order to make suitable decisions according to particular conditions and lead the whole group to gain their interests.

hardbeaverUID: 197443

up

rsrsUID: 146479

There is always a controverasy（controversy）that whether political leaders should yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. As far as I am concerned, political leaders, unlike the great thinkers and artists, should pay enough attention to both their own opinion and the public opinion and combine them intelligently to lead the society effectively.

In the first place, great thinkers and artists do not need (to) pay much attention to the critics from public. As we all know, the work of both thinkers and artists is a creation, which is just derived from their originality and inspiration, so people has (have) little influence on their work during the process of creation. Furthormore （Furthermore）, most times the work created by great thinkers and artists is so complex and profound that it reaches beyond the limit of public's knowledge and approciation（appreciation）, thus even (even一词在这里要表达的语气我看了不是很明白)the general people cannot understand the meaning of their work, say nothing of making advice or critics.(感觉make no advice or critics就可以)

In the second place, unlike great thinkers and artists, political leaders should prudently consider the opinion of public in order to make a suitable decision depending on particular conditions. On the one hand, the leaders, who are always outstanding in their fields, have the stronger abilities to see problems clearly, to catch the essence of the problems and to bring out solutions to the problems. When they make decisions, they must have considered them prudently, so there is no reason for them to changer (change) their decisions and yield to public easily. On the other hand, public have tremendous influence on the leaders. Political leaders should first gain the support of public, which is the precondition of their leading, so they can not (cannot) totally reject what the public say. Further, since the public can see the problem from more perspectives, they may make a clearer information about (make information about似不妥) the problem, which may be useful for the leaders to make decisions.

Finally, the political leaders should keep aware of going to the extreme, that is, accepting opinion of public without doubt. We know, the opinion of public often expresses the desire of the general people, which may be just a (an) express (expression) sometimes, neither reasoning nor scientific, so political leaders should think over it prudently before deciding whether to accept it or to reject it.(可以使用whether to accept or to reject)

In conclusion, the political leaders should take into consideration both opinions, from their own and from the public and draw the merits of them, in order to make suitable decisions according to particular conditions and lead the whole group to gain their interests（结尾有些仓促啦，整个句子的结构有点乱）


框架不错，但是展开显得不够，理由虽然很好，但是没有有说服力的例子或有深度的说理。另外，In the first place和In the second place用得略嫌生硬。
还有哦，单词拼错不可避免，但是贴上来之前还是自己用word改一改的好。句式的变化少了点，句子有时过长，结构出现混乱。

^_^批得好狠，见谅

hardbeaverUID: 197443

说得很对，以后注意改。我贴上来的是一点没改动的，我想这样能说明我的实际水平。

正在看你的文章

指向大海UID: 158737

There is always a controverasy that whether political leaders should yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. As far as I am concerned, political leaders,unlike the great thinkers and artists,should pay enough attention to both their own opinion and the public opinion and combine them intelligently to lead the society effectively.

In the first place, great thinkers and artists do not need pay much attention to the critics from public. As we all know, the work of both thinkers and artists is a creation, which is just derived from their originality and inspiration, so people has[have] little influence on their work during the process of creation.Furthormore, most times the work created by great thinkers and artists is so complex and profound that it reaches beyond the limit of public's knowledge and approciation[appreciation],thus even the general people cannot understand the meaning of their work, say nothing of making advice or critics.[not to mention making advice or critics]

In the second place, unlike great thinkers and artists,political leaders should prudently consider the opinion of public in order to make a suitable decision depending on particular conditions.On the one hand,the leaders, who are always outstanding in their fields, have the stronger abilities to see problems clearly,to catch the essence of the problems and to bring out solutions to the problems. When they make decisions, they must have considered them prudently,so there is no reason for them to changer their decisions and yield to public easily.On the other hand,public have tremendous influence on the leaders.Political leaders should first gain the support of public, which is the precondition of their leading, so they can not totally reject what the public say. Further, since the public can see the problem from more perspectives, they may make a clearer information about the problem, which may be useful for the leaders to make decisions.

Finally, the political leaders should keep aware of going to the extreme, that is, accepting opinion of public without doubt. We know, the opinion of public often expresses the desire of the general people,which may be just a express sometimes, neither reasoning nor scientific, so political leaders should think over it prudently before deciding whether to accept it or to reject it.

In conclusion, the political leaders should take into consideration both opinions, from their own and from the public and draw the merits of them, in order to make suitable decisions according to particular conditions and lead the whole group to gain their interests.
[语法错误三楼的改的很好了，我就不改了，不过我想说还是先在word里改一下的好方便改作文的人，不过你什么都不改就能这样很好了呢，我的初稿在word里是一片红线加绿线，发到网上了又被别人发现不少错误，惭愧啊
语言上还是有些中式的味道
你的结构，我觉得还是三段大致一样的长的好，而且这篇文章主要就是说政治领导应该怎么样，所以你的B1应该短些，B3长些
还有就是楼上也说了的需要例子的问题]