寄托天下
查看: 1525|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] ISSUE36 机井中的高频题, 大家快扔砖头吧 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
1
寄托币
1082
注册时间
2005-2-21
精华
1
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-3-4 09:05:29 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
------题目------
The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
------正文------
Please give me a rule, I want to measure the length and width of this desk; please give a thermometer for that I want to know my body’s temperature; generally, we can immediately give accurate data when we try to measure the usual things with some particular tools. If I want to evaluate one individual’s greatness, what tool can you give me? Perhaps, no tools. If any, the only tool must be the time. Person is so particular that its value is very difficult to be judged without enough time to have passed. The greatness of individuals should be filtered and testified by time. No one can guarantee one's evaluation on contemporary individual is objective and fair enough. Because the process to evaluate person is so complex involving so many subtle factors.
first, when one tries to evaluate person who live in his time, it is easy to be influenced by the main stream in society. In general, famous person has extensive and powerful influence; nobody can give a objective comment on him when he is alive. Just like drawing a portrait for a person, the picture can not embody all features of the object when the painter is under his shadow. There are so many examples in history that someone who was regarded as a great people by the people of that time was evaluated in totally different attitude by successive generations.
Consider, for instance, Guo Moruo, one famous Chinese writer. When he was alive, the majority of Chinese gave him very high praise both political leaders and common persons. Chairman Mao Zedong publicly honored him as "Flag of Chinese Literature" because he was very active in the literature revolution of China and wrote lots of political commentaries which were valued significantly by authority. so he was the popular cultural star of that time and even was viewed as their idol by thousands of young people. Unexpectedly, soon after he died, particularly after the culture revolution ended, the situation changed adversely. The once idol was revalued and was given a bad name. Ironically, it is because the same reason that he was imposed the bad name. most people thought what he said and did in the culture revolution totally served the authority while ignored the interest of most people. as the most famous writer,  he lost the principles and failed to implement his responsibilities. Today, after about 30 years of his death, his influence has become little among current young people, and more exactly, few people can recall him. From this story, it's easy for us to understand that how much influenced by the environment people’s evaluation on contemporary individual.
Furthermore, even commenter could escape from the famous person's shadow and be little influenced by social environment, it is also difficult to understand his greatness objectively. This is extrusive in arts and academic realm. limited by the experience or/and knowledge, the majority who seldom really understand the specific and  profound theories, may not have the appropriate appetite to digest and enjoy some great artistic works, may not have the quality to assess the value of great scientists and artists. vincent van Gogh, a genius of painting, created many valuable paintings, among which Sunflower is the most famous. But when he lived, he was ignored by people of his time, few respected him and few wanted to buy his paintings. More badly, he couldn't support himself. Finally he died because of poverty and disease. Soon after his death, His value and the unprecedented significance of his works shocked his country , then conquered the rest of world. Gold which covered by soil is glittering finally.
In sum, if one's greatness is accepted by the contemporaries, it is too early to be proud, and if one's greatness is ignored by people at his time, it is too early to be mad. Because the evaluation from the contemporaries is often distorted or decorated deliberately or by accident. The only persons who are qualified to evaluate the value of individuals are those who live after them.
just do,just believe!
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
962
注册时间
2004-10-27
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2005-3-4 09:25:58 |只看该作者
b2郭沫若的例子举的不好,剩下的我觉得还不错。
分别从主流社会的影响和民众知识、经验的有限说明了问题。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
1
寄托币
1082
注册时间
2005-2-21
精华
1
帖子
1
板凳
发表于 2005-3-4 10:10:52 |只看该作者
谢谢你呀,chenxg,我本想举这样一个例子的:当时的人们对他的评价很高,但是,后来人们发现他完全是欺世盗名。可惜没想出外国的好例子呀!你能不能OFFER 一个给我???
[QUOTE]最初由 chenxg 发布
[B]b2郭沫若的例子举的不好,
just do,just believe!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
763
注册时间
2005-2-20
精华
0
帖子
0
地板
发表于 2005-3-4 10:25:14 |只看该作者
开头还比较别具一格,句子也写得不错。
宝宝,爱你!
一起走过的路,即使看不到尽头也要永远牵着手......

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
1
寄托币
1082
注册时间
2005-2-21
精华
1
帖子
1
5
发表于 2005-3-4 10:57:04 |只看该作者
最初由 山涧风笛 发布
[B]开头还比较别具一格,
谢谢山涧风笛,呵呵,你的名字更是别具一格呀!

句子也写得不错。
惭愧!限时状态下写的,句子不可能写得不错,谢谢你的鼓励,另外, 你言下之意是不是认为例子选得不恰当?可否提供一个替代郭沫若的例子呀?[/B]
just do,just believe!

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE36 机井中的高频题, 大家快扔砖头吧 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE36 机井中的高频题, 大家快扔砖头吧
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-252333-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部