issue239 科技类 自己先改过一遍 必回拍

medwinUID: 189909

题目
issue239 "Much of the information that people assume is 'factual' actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future."

提纲
Much of the information actually turns out to be inaccurate.But it should still be trusted.
1.Much of information which seems to be 'fact' might be discovered as an inaccuracy later.
2.Not every piece of information which is referred to as 'fact' will be surely belied in the future.
3.We neet to trust the information which is considered as a fact because it is the base on which our knowledge can be advanced,

正文
The speaker has made two claims in this issue. The first one is that much of the information turns out to be inaccurate which is formerly considered as "factual" one; the second is that any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrust because it is quite likely to be proven false in the future. I strongly agree with the first claim while I think the second one is not so convincible, as explained in the following discussion.

For the first claim of the speaker, I agree that much of information which seems to be 'fact' might be discovered as an inaccuracy later. Information is a subjective concept, which reflects the objective observations in our mind. For this nature, ensuring its correctness is not practical or possible, even though it was once accepted by most people as a fact. For instance, people used to consider as a truth that the earth is the centre of the universe; however it was proved to be false several centuries later. Classical theory of physics developed by Newton used to be seen as an indisputable law in science; but it is less precise when compared with theory of relativity and quantum. It was believed in the past that human are produced by god, which lasted until the discovery of evolution made by Darwin. Thus, we can conclude that information has its limit decided by the lever of the ability for people to perceive and analyze the world.

For the second claim, I contends that, although information is not always right, it does not follow that each piece of information which is referred to as 'fact' will be surely belied in the future. There is no evidence to support the logical relationship between a prevenient 'fact' and a later false. Whatever else may be said, most people would agree that not all the information is erroneous. Information is produced in the process that people observe an external object or event. As it can be wrong, it has the same possibility to be right. As none of us can deny that the blood is red while the grass is green, how can these obvious facts be proven inexact in the future? Thus, not all the information can be repulsed; there are still some facts that will continue to be facts in the future.

Finally, the information which is considered as a fact is the base on which our knowledge can be advanced, and even disconfirm what is steadily believed in the future. No matter whether the information is right or wrong in fact, it has already been taken as rules or principles to interpreter the current problems around us. We need to trust such information. Only in this way, we can then develop our knowledge to deepen our analysis of those problems and to consequently find more phenomena which are not reconciled with the current 'fact'. The evidence can be easily found also in physics history. Without trusting Newton’s theory, the science and technology could not develop high enough to detect the unexplainable events in late 19th century, which served the constitution of the theory of relativity and quantum. If we discard those so-called facts at the very beginning, we can not reach the extent to which the information is disproved and a new acceptance is gained.

In sum, it is true that much of the widely approved facts before are actually inaccurate. But not all of them are proven to be wrong. We need to trust this information, for it is still useful for us to cognize the world and acquire new knowledge.

chenh1207UID: 182826

赞座，明天法上来！

runningpiggyUID: 194977

The speaker has made two claims in this issue. The first one is that much of the information turns out to be inaccurate which is formerly considered as "factual" one; the second is that any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrust(mistrusting or misleading?) because it is quite likely to be proven false in the future. I strongly agree with the first claim while I think the second one is not so convincible, as explained in the following discussion.(这应该是一类开头,但是似乎写得平淡了点,其实可以花点时间写写这类开头的模版,用些更漂亮的词语和句子)

For the first claim of the speaker, I agree that much of information which seems to be 'fact' might be discovered as an inaccuracy later. Information is a subjective concept, which reflects the objective observations in our mind. For this nature, ensuring its correctness is not practical or possible, even though it was once accepted by most people as a fact. For instance, people used to consider as a truth that the earth is the centre of the universe; however it was proved to be false several centuries later. Classical theory of physics developed by Newton used to be seen as an indisputable law in science; but it is less precise when compared with theory(该是复数吧) of relativity and quantum. It was believed in the past that human are produced by god, which lasted until the discovery of evolution made by Darwin.(用进化论不知道好不好,因为似乎GRE对进化论的态度都是负面的) Thus, we can conclude that information has its limit decided by the lever of the ability for people to perceive and analyze the world.

For the second claim, I contends that, although information is not always right, it does not follow that each piece of information which is referred to as 'fact' will be surely belied in the future. There is no evidence to support the logical relationship between a prevenient 'fact' and a later false(later a false). Whatever else may be said, most people would agree that not all the information is erroneous. Information is produced in the process that people observe an external object or event. As it can be wrong, it has the same possibility to be right. As none of us can deny that the blood is red while the grass is green, how can these obvious facts be proven inexact in the future?(不如用用黑格尔的名言:存在的就是合理的) Thus, not all the information can be repulsed; there are still some facts that will continue to be facts in the future.

Finally, the information which is considered as a fact is the base on which our knowledge can be advanced, and even disconfirm what is steadily believed in the future. No matter whether the information is right or wrong in fact, it has already been taken as rules or principles to interpreter the current problems around us. We need to trust such information. Only in this way, we can then develop our knowledge to deepen our analysis of those problems and to consequently find more phenomena which are not reconciled with the current 'fact'.(用用only的倒装吧,感觉好一些) The evidence can be easily found also in physics history. Without trusting Newton's theory, the science and technology could not develop high enough to detect the unexplainable events in late 19th century, which served the constitution of the theory of relativity and quantum.(牛顿说,他是站在巨人的肩膀上的) If we discard those so-called facts at the very beginning, we can not reach the extent to which the information is disproved and a new acceptance is gained.

In sum, it is true that much of the widely approved facts before are actually inaccurate. But not all of them are proven to be wrong. We need to trust this information, for it is still useful for us to cognize the world and acquire new knowledge.


总体而言,论述很清晰,例子也不错.但是语言稍嫌平淡,我觉得你认识的单词和你使用的单词有挺大的gap的,不如总结一下平时使用的普通的单词,好像very,many之类的,换成猛一点的单词.另外,长句太少了,背多些好句子吧.

medwinUID: 189909

多谢多谢，正为这事发愁

hardbeaverUID: 197443

占个座，一会发上来

hardbeaverUID: 197443

题目
issue239 "Much of the information that people assume is 'factual' actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future."

提纲
Much of the information actually turns out to be inaccurate.But it should still be trusted.
1.Much of information which seems to be 'fact' might be discovered as an inaccuracy later.
2.Not every piece of information which is referred to as 'fact' will be surely belied in the future.
3.We neet to trust the information which is considered as a fact because it is the base on which our knowledge can be advanced,

正文
The speaker has made two claims in this issue. The first one is that much of the information turns out to be inaccurate which is formerly considered as "factual" one; the second is that any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrust because it is quite likely to be proven false in the future. I strongly agree with the first claim whileyet I think the second one is not so convincible, as explained in the following discussion.

For the first claim of the speaker, I agree that much of information which seems to be 'fact' might be discovered as an inaccuracy later. Information is a subjective concept, which reflects the objective observations in our mind. For this nature, ensuring its correctness is not practical or possible, even though it was once accepted by most people as a fact. For instance, people used to consider as a truth that the earth is the centre of the universe; however it was proved to be false several centuries later. Classical theory of physics developed by Newton used to be seen as an indisputable law in science; but it is less precise when compared with theory of relativity and quantum. It was believed in the past that human are produced by god, which lasted until the discovery of evolution made by Darwin. Thus, we can conclude that information has its limit decided by the leverlevel of the ability for people to perceive and analyze the world.

For the second claim, I contends that, although information is not always right, it does not follow that each piece of information which is referred to as 'fact' will be surely belied in the future. There is no evidence to support the logical relationship between a prevenient 'fact' and a later false. Whatever else may be said, most people would agree that not all the information is erroneous. Information is produced in the process thatin which people observe an external object or event. As it can be wrong, it has the same possibility to be right. As none of us can deny that the blood is red while the grass is green, how can these obvious facts be proven inexact in the future? Thus, not all the information can be repulsed; there are still some facts that will continue to be facts in the future.

Finally, the information which is considered as a fact is the base on which our knowledge can be advanced, and even disconfirm what is steadily believed in the future. No matter whether the information is right or wrong in fact, it has already been taken as rules or principles to interpreter the current problems around us. We need to trust such information. Only in this way, we can then develop our knowledge to deepen our analysis of those problems and to consequently find more phenomena which are not reconciled with the current 'fact'. The evidence can be easily found also in physics history. Without trusting Newton’s theory, the science and technology could not develop high enough to detect the unexplainable events in late 19th century, which served the constitution of the theory of relativity and quantum. If we discard those so-called facts at the very beginning, we can not reach the extent to which the information is disproved and a new acceptance is gained.

In sum, it is true that much of the widely approved facts before are actually inaccurate. But not all of them are proven to be wrong. We need to trust this information, for it is still useful for us to cognize the world and acquire new knowledge.

文章挺好的，条理很清楚，例子也都不错。
我不知道darwin's adaptive theory是不是被肯定的，但听到好多人说这个理论有争议，再搞搞清楚吧。
加油！

chenh1207UID: 182826

issue239 科技类 自己先改过一遍 必回拍 medwin
题目
issue239 "Much of the information that people assume is 'factual' actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future."

提纲
Much of the information actually turns out to be inaccurate.But it should still be trusted.
1.Much of information which seems to be 'fact' might be discovered as an inaccuracy later.
2.Not every piece of information which is referred to as 'fact' will be surely belied in the future.
3.We neet to trust the information which is considered as a fact because it is the base on which our knowledge can be advanced,
[先总体的说一句：文章结构清晰！尤其是你对长题目的破题的方法，让我翻然醒悟，谢谢！]
[另外你对factual的理解也很正确呀，我原先以为是“理念之类的“，看了你的文章发现原来是”观察或客观的事物“，这点看出你肯定花了不少功夫！]

正文
The speaker has made two claims in this issue. The first one is that much of the information turns out to be inaccurate which is[换成although] formerly considered as "factual" one; the second [one] is that any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrust because it is quite likely to be proven false in the future. I[hereby] strongly agree with the first claim[,] while I think the second one is not so convincible, as explained in the following discussion.[followings are the reasons why I hold on that position.]
[虽然很自白，但是让人一看就可以清楚的知道文章的几部份，且清楚的理解了题目未忽视题目中的信息，这是最让我值得学习得！]
For the first claim of the speaker, I agree that much of information which seems to be '[a] fact' might be discovered as an inaccuracy later. Information is a subjective concept, which reflects the objective observations in our mind. For this nature[point], ensuring its correctness is not practical or possible, even though it was once accepted by most people as a fact.[这个让步不太好，因为后面并未说明如何not practical or possible] For instance, people used to consider [as a truth 多余了]that the earth is[was] the centre of the universe; however[however放在句前表示无论如何，如果要是表示转折应在句中] it[,however,]] was proved to be false several centuries later. Classical theory of physics developed by Newton used to be seen as an indisputable law in science; but it is less precise when compared with theory of relativity and quantum. It was believed in the past that human[beings] are[were] produced by god, which lasted until the discovery of evolution [made去掉]] by Darwin. Thus, we can conclude that information has its limit decided by the lever[level] of the ability for people to perceive and analyze the world[and can not be always factual .]
[这段的例子举得不错]
For the second claim, I contends that, although information is not always right, it does not follow that each piece of information which is referred to as 'fact' will be surely belied in the future. There is no evidence to support the logical relationship between a prevenient 'fact' and a later false. Whatever else may be said, most people would agree that not all the information is erroneous. Information is produced in the process that people observe an external object or event. As it can be wrong, it has the same possibility to be right. As none of us can deny that the blood is red while[and] the grass is green, how can these obvious facts be proven inexact[inaccurate] in the future?[这句应该展开，即如何不能被证伪] Thus, not all the information can be repulsed; there are still some facts that will continue to be facts in the future.

Finally, the information which is considered as a fact is the base on which our knowledge can be advanced, and even disconfirm[后半个分句没看懂] what is steadily believed in the future. No matter whether the information is right or wrong in fact, it has already been taken as rules or principles to interpreter the current problems around us. We need to trust such information. Only in this way, we can then develop our knowledge to deepen our analysis of those problems and to consequently find more phenomena which are not reconciled with the current 'fact'. The evidence can be easily found also in physics history. Without trusting Newton’s theory, the science and technology could not develop high enough to detect the unexplainable events in late 19th century, which served the constitution of the theory of relativity and quantum. If we discard those so-called facts at the very beginning, we can not reach the extent to which the information is disproved and a new acceptance is gained. [总分总的结构，让人看得很清楚]

In sum, it is true that much of the widely approved facts before are actually inaccurate. But not all of them are proven to be wrong. We need to trust this information, for it is still useful for us to cognize the world and acquire new knowledge.[重述主题，但效果一般，应继续深化呀]