[color=#0000ff]质疑北美280的issue4，大家来讨论一下这种写法

xiongyicnUID: 192745

Issue 4
"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."



今晚想写issue4，没理提纲，直接限时开始，我是赞成这个观点的，但不知道怎么去逻辑性地证明，憋了很久也不知道从而所起，看着45分钟一点一点从眼前溜走，心里那个难受啊！无赖，去看老美的范文。
发现范文就从两个实例（人类学和天文学），在一个总结就得到了结论，虽然这两个实例写得很充分，但这能论证所有的情况吗？这种写发可取吗？？


I strongly agree with the assertion that significant advances in knowledge require expertise from various fields. The world around us presents a seamless web of physical and anthropogenic forces, which interact in ways that can be understood only in the context of a variety of disciplines. Two examples that aptly illustrate this point involve the fields of cultural anthropology and astronomy.
Consider how a cultural anthropologist's knowledge about an ancient civilization is enhanced not only by the expertise of the archeologist--who unearths the evidence--but ultimately by the expertise of biochemists, geologists, linguists, and even astronomers. By analyzing the hair, nails, blood and bones of mummified bodies, biochemists and forensic scientists can determine the life expectancy, general well-being, and common causes of death of the population. These experts can also ensure the proper preservation of evidence found at the archeological site. A geologist can help identify the source and age of the materials used for tools, weapons, and structures--thereby enabling the anthropologist to extrapolate about the civilization's economy, trades and work habits, life styles, extent of travel and mobility, and so forth. Linguists are needed to interpret hieroglyphics and extrapolate from found fragments of writings. And an astronomer can help explain the layout of an ancient city as well as the design, structure and position of monuments, tombs, and temples--since ancients often looked to the stars for guidance in building cities and structures.
An even more striking example of how expertise in diverse fields is needed to advance knowledge involves the area of astronomy and space exploration. Significant advancements in our knowledge of the solar system and the universe require increasingly keen tools for observation and measurement. Telescope technology and the measurement of celestial distances, masses, volumes, and so forth, are the domain of astrophysicists. These advances also require increasingly sophisticated means of exploration. Manned and unmanned exploratory probes are designed by mechanical, electrical, and computer engineers. And to build and enable these technologies requires the acumen and savvy of business leaders, managers, and politicians. Even diplomats might play a role--insofar as major space projects require international cooperative efforts among the world's scientists and governments. And ultimately it is our philosophers whose expertise helps provide meaning to what we learn about our universe.
In sum, no area of intellectual inquiry operates in a vacuum. Because the sciences are inextricably related, to advance our knowledge in any one area we must understand the interplay among them all. Moreover, it is our non-scientists who make possible the science, and who bring meaning to what we learn from it.

flyingwindUID: 189320

我觉得可行！保守点说，5分是肯定可以保证的

flyingwindUID: 189320

这篇我写了，供参考

见我的签名档

tieren201500UID: 177122

这样写可以的，也看过些这样的文章。

帮我看看这篇吧。issue30
https://bbs.gter.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=252821
一定帮你们改

指向大海UID: 158737

方方面面式写法，不错的说