- 最后登录
- 2008-1-19
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 352
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-11-15
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 273
- UID
- 186146

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 352
- 注册时间
- 2004-11-15
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
也请指出我的作文的问题,谢谢-
-----题目------
The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
------正文------
Can the greatness of individuals be recognized only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries? In my point of view, this claim is justifiable for the following reasons.
One of the reasons is that society is going ahead with the time flowing. In one hand, with knowledge accumulated, people understand and comprehend matters more intensively or lucidly, consequently, the progeniture could qualify to evaluate the greatness in more extent. In the other hand, more and more problems of the predecessor could be found by the offspring, as a result, so-called “greatness” could be clarified by posterity. For example, the principle of relativity, establish by Einstein, replace the concept of absolute frame of reference put forward by Newton in the physics. As a result of the human going ahead, the ken of people is broadened and more verities could be attained. By this token, people live subsequently might see the greatness more clearly.
Second, contemporaries’ reflection always confined in an invisible circle by the prevailing notion. People usually accustom to accept rather than doubt even refute. At the same time, the giant always hold advanced even “incredible” views in the eyes of contemporary ordinary people. Consequently, the giant were always looked down upon by the contemporaries. For example, Vincent Van Gogh, the representative of terminal impressionist, disregard the academic doctrine and spurn the acquired knowledge, did not accept by his contemporaries, however, approved to be a great artist after his death. Holding the fixed idea that writing or painting should be in reality, contemporaries did not admit Van Gogh. In a word, the progeny’s estimation could avoid these limitations.
In addition, time is always the criterion to verify the truth and greatness. The blemish of some inventions cannot be discovered by contemporaries in short time. It is indispensable to take a long time to verify the truth or greatness. Consider, for example, the insecticide 666, during its prophase, which is of full of merits in the eyes of contemporaries, in the end, it proved to threat the healthy of people. Actually, a multiply kinds of inventions have flaws which might hardly be demonstrated at the beginning of applying to market. However, with the time lapsing, more and more problems could appear due to take into effect in a large compass. By this token, progeniture have connatural advantages compared with the contemporaries.
Admittedly, the greatness of the individuals can be recognized by the people live after them for the above reasons. However, I also hope that contemporaries could try their best to see the issue more clearly and admit the true greatness early. |
|