- 最后登录
- 2013-5-19
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 577
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2002-6-25
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 273
- UID
- 58234

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 577
- 注册时间
- 2002-6-25
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
There is always a controversy that the greatness of individuals can be decided by whether those who live after them or their contemporaries. As far as am concern( 应该是as far as I am concerned 的吧), I deny (deny这个词感觉太严重了 )the assertion of the author, and that I strongly agree with ( 我觉得这里你用believe比较好,因为以下驳斥的观点是你自己提出的)that the greatness of individuals are objective and some can be admitted by their contemporaries but the others only by those who live after them. This attribute to at least three factors, such as complexity of the contributions, the capability of observers, and the conditions where the observers are in.
To begin with, the greatness of individuals for the society are objective, which can’t be decided by anyone. Moreover, even if we don’t know the contributions of individuals, there(they?) also exist in the society. As we know, the realization is a process depending on many factors, such as the background of the observer(用复数形式, condition也是 ), the condition of the society and so on, thus it will take time to realize it. What is the definition of the greatness? It is a relatively concept. As far as I am concern, the greatness is successful in art, academic, economy, and spirit. (我认为给greatness定义没有必要 )It is possibly ( possible)that all the people who promote the society to widely develop in their field are greatnesses.( 这句话好像不大通顺) For example, Einstein made a large contribution for the world so he is (was) the greatness for human being, even if some opponent scientist(scientists) didn’t admit his theory, but his theory has been made.(最后一句话能不能换个说法)
一开始立论很好, 但是论证的时候混乱, 没有条理,语法上注意复数形式 . greatness and great (person)我认为是有区别的, 好像这段里面作者理解为greatness = great person, 这样是否不妥?
Furthermore, in certain extent, the individuals who are in the academic and technical field ( fields ) can be admitted easily by their contemporaries. In this era of rapid society and change of the technology, the software develops faster than other technology. Nowadays we all know Bill (Bill Gates不难拼得 )who creates(created ) the Microsoft which is famous all over the word. He has made success in software when he was very young, 时态!this is because the technology of the computer develops very fast and almost everyone has touched it or will touch. The process of realization is easy,( 不要用中文式的英语,可以直接用it is easy for people to .....) thus in these fields many people concern them, so we can get a relatively objective observation of them. History also tells us many examples like this such as the Martin Luther King and Mother Teresa and so on, the greatness of individuals are all admitted by their contemporaries.
这段的论证比前面一段还要混乱 , 既然一开始说了在学术和科技方面比较容易被承认的伟人,然后例举Bill Gates, 这里还说的过去,但是后面一段blah blah转向电脑软件技术的, 最后一句实在是失败, 同此段一开始相差甚远
Finally, considering the complexity of the comment, some other field can’t be commented for many reasons. Take the political for example, we all know that Hitler is a person who is crazy for the war, but in his period many people claimed that he has many greatness, while few people in his Germany are against him. People can’t comment him since anyone who critical him will be executed. And also in our times, the political always is a sensitive problem. Usually we have to accept them in that the polity is protected by law and government. So considering these factors people in our time can’t objectively comment the greatness of individuals.
简单语法错误(时态,词汇,主谓一致)太多了,恕不仔细修改。 感觉例子不大恰当
To sum up, we can comment on some greatness of individuals who is in scientific or academic field, but we can’t comment those who work in the field such political. In order to comment on the greatness of individuals better we should consider many factors and avoid including subjective attitude.
一些简单的语法错误应该先在word 里检查一番。
complexity of the contributions, the capability of observers, and the conditions where the observers are in.
说实在你一开始理出这3个方面不能算失败, 我以为你会从这3个方面来讨论, 从论证上来看你也确实努力想要做到,但是论述的过程是在没有条理, 例子举的不典型,有些甚至不恰当。 而且从文章结构和语法上来看,就像喇叭----越来越差, 恕我直言.
最后希望大家互改,链接在我的签名文档里
|
|