- 最后登录
- 2008-9-4
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 1980
- 声望
- 2
- 注册时间
- 2005-1-21
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 6
- 精华
- 3
- 积分
- 1340
- UID
- 192988

- 声望
- 2
- 寄托币
- 1980
- 注册时间
- 2005-1-21
- 精华
- 3
- 帖子
- 6
|
Practicality, opposite to idealism, refers to the purpose to use something. Thus I agree with the speaker that all our effects [effects? Aim at??] and intentions aim at the end [ultimate 好点, end 和 purpose 都有目标的意思吧] purpose-- to utilize it, in other words, practicality, rather than simply release our time [release time??]and talents. Nevertheless, I strongly disagree the conclusion drew in the topic that presumptuously [?] objects the value of the issues which are not obviously practical today [这句话好像有点问题, 我没看太懂].
Practicality is the standard to measure whether something should be done or not. To mention the importance and necessity of practicality, one needs to look no further than our daily life for supporting examples. Consider the establishment of thousands of subjects [说的是学科么? Subject意思有点多, 用discipline吧. 可以写几个呀, such as…]; they are all originated from people's desire to understand and utilize the outside world. Also, the governments and authorities support the development of the subjects [总觉得subject 有点怪, 哈哈, 只是直觉啦] concerned with military with the purpose to utilize one day the research results [这个后面最好接一个具体的例子, 什么purpose, 哪一项 research results]. These two examples above focus on the word "useful"-- in another word, "practicality". Since the nowadays people adore high profits and short-time reward, it can be easy implied that no government or firms intend to choose some field that totally separated from practicality. Therefore the issues with obvious practicality in short time [这个short time出现的不太好, 因为前面的两个例子都没有显示出是short-time practicality]should be taken into prior place to get funding and supporting to development.
However, one cannot arbitrary [副词呀, 小姐] concluded [concluded??]that things not obviously practical [换个说法吧, free of practicality, absent of practicality等等] has [have] little value in today's world. As we know, not all things could show their potential at the first step of development. For example, the theory related to arts and literatures seems far from the mundane earth that most us people have no opportunity to be utilized to earn something beneficial [走神了呀, 前面表达的是at the first step of development, 这里又说大多数人用不到]. However, no one could deny the value of the existence of arts and literature [接着走, 前面说理论, 现在概念又扩大到艺术和文学了] . The functions of such things are hidden rather than that of science which could bring profits in a short time. They alternated peoples' life subtly, little by little [怎么改变生活的? 不过句型很好呀], rather than bringing revolutions and reforms as the science does. Their values are irreplaceable [因为前面没说怎么改变, 所以这个irreplaceable 没有体现出来]although they are usually blamed as useless and wasteful. [这段思维很跳跃, 呵呵]
Therefore, things not obviously practical today should also be served by the powers and talents from people; while the things with foreseeable practicality should be taken into consideration seriously. They are all components of the development of society and human beings, without either of which [them] the society may trapped into havoc that the both the prosperity and poor happens in different subjects and fields [这句好乱,重新组织一下吧, havoc有点过了吧, 至少文章中没有体现出没有他们就会havoc]. People may focus all their attention into something seemingly practical and neglect the normal development of the things that may needs more concerns and supports [前面那句表达的意思是没有他们中的任何一个, 后面就应该两个反面都要说, 而不是只说忽略了没有明显实用性的东西会怎么怎么样. The traditional cultural problems [实用不实用是文化问题??]-- which represent the "unpractical" things nowadays, and the future of national economics-- which are referred to one of the most practical question of people should be both importantly involved to determinate the destiny to develop a society.[不懂什么意思这句话, (现在越来越发现我写中文像写英文的语序了)]
In conclusion, although the practicality varies due to the difference in distinguished things, people have no excuse to choose some to dedicate their powers and talents while give up and overlook the others [尽管不同事物的实用性不同, 人们没有借口重视一些却忽略其他?? 让步的部分文章中没有体现呀]. They differ only in practicality to certain extent [这个直接从文章中也得不出]; but they are all valuable that deserve development and prosperity.
[猫猫这篇写的不太好, 逻辑有点混乱. B2部分应该是你重点写的, 想想把内容扩充一下, 逻辑整理一下. B3这种很容易写一些比较空的话, 能舍就舍吧. 肚子饿了, 饭饭去了] |
|